Cargando…

Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech

Speech audiometry is an essential part of audiological diagnostics and clinical measurements. Development times of speech recognition tests are rather long, depending on the size of speech corpus and optimization necessity. The aim of this study was to examine whether this development effort could b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuesse, Theresa, Wiercinski, Bianca, Brand, Thomas, Holube, Inga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31322032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519862982
_version_ 1783437087765168128
author Nuesse, Theresa
Wiercinski, Bianca
Brand, Thomas
Holube, Inga
author_facet Nuesse, Theresa
Wiercinski, Bianca
Brand, Thomas
Holube, Inga
author_sort Nuesse, Theresa
collection PubMed
description Speech audiometry is an essential part of audiological diagnostics and clinical measurements. Development times of speech recognition tests are rather long, depending on the size of speech corpus and optimization necessity. The aim of this study was to examine whether this development effort could be reduced by using synthetic speech in speech audiometry, especially in a matrix test for speech recognition. For this purpose, the speech material of the German matrix test was replicated using a preselected commercial system to generate the synthetic speech files. In contrast to the conventional matrix test, no level adjustments or optimization tests were performed while producing the synthetic speech material. Evaluation measurements were conducted by presenting both versions of the German matrix test (with natural or synthetic speech), alternately and at three different signal-to-noise ratios, to 48 young, normal-hearing participants. Psychometric functions were fitted to the empirical data. Speech recognition thresholds were 0.5 dB signal-to-noise ratio higher (worse) for the synthetic speech, while slopes were equal for both speech types. Nevertheless, speech recognition scores were comparable with the literature and the threshold difference lay within the same range as recordings of two different natural speakers. Although no optimization was applied, the synthetic-speech signals led to equivalent recognition of the different test lists and word categories. The outcomes of this study indicate that the application of synthetic speech in speech recognition tests could considerably reduce the development costs and evaluation time. This offers the opportunity to increase the speech corpus for speech recognition tests with acceptable effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6643172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66431722019-07-31 Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech Nuesse, Theresa Wiercinski, Bianca Brand, Thomas Holube, Inga Trends Hear Original Article Speech audiometry is an essential part of audiological diagnostics and clinical measurements. Development times of speech recognition tests are rather long, depending on the size of speech corpus and optimization necessity. The aim of this study was to examine whether this development effort could be reduced by using synthetic speech in speech audiometry, especially in a matrix test for speech recognition. For this purpose, the speech material of the German matrix test was replicated using a preselected commercial system to generate the synthetic speech files. In contrast to the conventional matrix test, no level adjustments or optimization tests were performed while producing the synthetic speech material. Evaluation measurements were conducted by presenting both versions of the German matrix test (with natural or synthetic speech), alternately and at three different signal-to-noise ratios, to 48 young, normal-hearing participants. Psychometric functions were fitted to the empirical data. Speech recognition thresholds were 0.5 dB signal-to-noise ratio higher (worse) for the synthetic speech, while slopes were equal for both speech types. Nevertheless, speech recognition scores were comparable with the literature and the threshold difference lay within the same range as recordings of two different natural speakers. Although no optimization was applied, the synthetic-speech signals led to equivalent recognition of the different test lists and word categories. The outcomes of this study indicate that the application of synthetic speech in speech recognition tests could considerably reduce the development costs and evaluation time. This offers the opportunity to increase the speech corpus for speech recognition tests with acceptable effort. SAGE Publications 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6643172/ /pubmed/31322032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519862982 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nuesse, Theresa
Wiercinski, Bianca
Brand, Thomas
Holube, Inga
Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech
title Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech
title_full Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech
title_fullStr Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech
title_short Measuring Speech Recognition With a Matrix Test Using Synthetic Speech
title_sort measuring speech recognition with a matrix test using synthetic speech
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31322032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519862982
work_keys_str_mv AT nuessetheresa measuringspeechrecognitionwithamatrixtestusingsyntheticspeech
AT wiercinskibianca measuringspeechrecognitionwithamatrixtestusingsyntheticspeech
AT brandthomas measuringspeechrecognitionwithamatrixtestusingsyntheticspeech
AT holubeinga measuringspeechrecognitionwithamatrixtestusingsyntheticspeech