Cargando…
Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
The current evidence regarding the association between vitamin D status and pelvic floor disorder (PFD) are inconclusive. This meta-analysis was aimed to summarize existing data demonstrating the association between Vitamin D status and PFD using published observational studies. All national and int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_9_19 |
_version_ | 1783437152927875072 |
---|---|
author | Ghanbari, Zinat Karamali, Maryam Mirhosseini, Naghmeh Akbari, Maryam Tabrizi, Reza Lankarani, Kamran B. Eftekhar, Tahereh Pesikhani, Maryam Deldar Borzabadi, Shokoofeh Asemi, Zatollah |
author_facet | Ghanbari, Zinat Karamali, Maryam Mirhosseini, Naghmeh Akbari, Maryam Tabrizi, Reza Lankarani, Kamran B. Eftekhar, Tahereh Pesikhani, Maryam Deldar Borzabadi, Shokoofeh Asemi, Zatollah |
author_sort | Ghanbari, Zinat |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current evidence regarding the association between vitamin D status and pelvic floor disorder (PFD) are inconclusive. This meta-analysis was aimed to summarize existing data demonstrating the association between Vitamin D status and PFD using published observational studies. All national and international databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched up until January 30, 2018, and related published studies retrieved for meta-analysis. The effect sizes of Vitamin D status were presented as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using random-effect models and inverse variance method. The Cochran Q statistic and I(2) tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across included studies. Seven studies with 3219 women were included our meta-analysis. There was heterogeneity existing among included studies (I(2) = 96.4%, P < 0.001), so a random-effect model was used. The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that the mean serum Vitamin D levels in women with PFD were significantly lower than healthy women (SMD −0.60; 95% CI, −1.06, −0.13; P = 0.01). This meta-analysis demonstrates lower levels of serum Vitamin D in women with PFD rather than healthy women. Additional prospective studies regarding the association between Vitamin D status and PFD are required to confirm our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6643706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66437062019-08-07 Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Ghanbari, Zinat Karamali, Maryam Mirhosseini, Naghmeh Akbari, Maryam Tabrizi, Reza Lankarani, Kamran B. Eftekhar, Tahereh Pesikhani, Maryam Deldar Borzabadi, Shokoofeh Asemi, Zatollah J Midlife Health Review Article The current evidence regarding the association between vitamin D status and pelvic floor disorder (PFD) are inconclusive. This meta-analysis was aimed to summarize existing data demonstrating the association between Vitamin D status and PFD using published observational studies. All national and international databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched up until January 30, 2018, and related published studies retrieved for meta-analysis. The effect sizes of Vitamin D status were presented as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using random-effect models and inverse variance method. The Cochran Q statistic and I(2) tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across included studies. Seven studies with 3219 women were included our meta-analysis. There was heterogeneity existing among included studies (I(2) = 96.4%, P < 0.001), so a random-effect model was used. The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that the mean serum Vitamin D levels in women with PFD were significantly lower than healthy women (SMD −0.60; 95% CI, −1.06, −0.13; P = 0.01). This meta-analysis demonstrates lower levels of serum Vitamin D in women with PFD rather than healthy women. Additional prospective studies regarding the association between Vitamin D status and PFD are required to confirm our findings. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6643706/ /pubmed/31391753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_9_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ghanbari, Zinat Karamali, Maryam Mirhosseini, Naghmeh Akbari, Maryam Tabrizi, Reza Lankarani, Kamran B. Eftekhar, Tahereh Pesikhani, Maryam Deldar Borzabadi, Shokoofeh Asemi, Zatollah Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title | Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full | Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_fullStr | Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_short | Vitamin D Status in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_sort | vitamin d status in women with pelvic floor disorders: a meta-analysis of observational studies |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_9_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghanbarizinat vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT karamalimaryam vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT mirhosseininaghmeh vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT akbarimaryam vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT tabrizireza vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT lankaranikamranb vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT eftekhartahereh vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT pesikhanimaryamdeldar vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT borzabadishokoofeh vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT asemizatollah vitamindstatusinwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersametaanalysisofobservationalstudies |