Cargando…
Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program
Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was per...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200917 |
_version_ | 1783437174140567552 |
---|---|
author | Stewart-Brown, Benjamin B. Song, Qijian Vaughn, Justin N. Li, Zenglu |
author_facet | Stewart-Brown, Benjamin B. Song, Qijian Vaughn, Justin N. Li, Zenglu |
author_sort | Stewart-Brown, Benjamin B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was performed using RR-BLUP and predictive abilities (r(MP)) of 0.81, 0.71, and 0.26 for protein, oil, and yield, were achieved at the largest tested training set size. Minimal differences were observed when comparing different marker densities and there appeared to be inflation in r(MP) due to population structure. For comparison purposes, two additional methods to predict breeding values for lines of four bi-parental populations within the GS dataset were tested. The first method predicted within each bi-parental population (WP method) and utilized a training set of full-sibs of the validation set. The second method utilized a training set of all remaining breeding lines except for full-sibs of the validation set to predict across populations (AP method). The AP method is more practical as the WP method would likely delay the breeding cycle and leverage smaller training sets. Averaging across populations for protein and oil content, r(MP) for the AP method (0.55, 0.30) approached r(MP) for the WP method (0.60, 0.52). Though comparable, r(MP) for yield was low for both AP and WP methods (0.12, 0.13). Based on increases in r(MP) as training sets increased and the effectiveness of WP vs. AP method, the AP method could potentially improve with larger training sets and increased relatedness between training and validation sets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6643879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66438792019-07-25 Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program Stewart-Brown, Benjamin B. Song, Qijian Vaughn, Justin N. Li, Zenglu G3 (Bethesda) Genomic Prediction Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was performed using RR-BLUP and predictive abilities (r(MP)) of 0.81, 0.71, and 0.26 for protein, oil, and yield, were achieved at the largest tested training set size. Minimal differences were observed when comparing different marker densities and there appeared to be inflation in r(MP) due to population structure. For comparison purposes, two additional methods to predict breeding values for lines of four bi-parental populations within the GS dataset were tested. The first method predicted within each bi-parental population (WP method) and utilized a training set of full-sibs of the validation set. The second method utilized a training set of all remaining breeding lines except for full-sibs of the validation set to predict across populations (AP method). The AP method is more practical as the WP method would likely delay the breeding cycle and leverage smaller training sets. Averaging across populations for protein and oil content, r(MP) for the AP method (0.55, 0.30) approached r(MP) for the WP method (0.60, 0.52). Though comparable, r(MP) for yield was low for both AP and WP methods (0.12, 0.13). Based on increases in r(MP) as training sets increased and the effectiveness of WP vs. AP method, the AP method could potentially improve with larger training sets and increased relatedness between training and validation sets. Genetics Society of America 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6643879/ /pubmed/31088906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200917 Text en Copyright © 2019 Stewart-Brown et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genomic Prediction Stewart-Brown, Benjamin B. Song, Qijian Vaughn, Justin N. Li, Zenglu Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program |
title | Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program |
title_full | Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program |
title_fullStr | Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program |
title_short | Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program |
title_sort | genomic selection for yield and seed composition traits within an applied soybean breeding program |
topic | Genomic Prediction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stewartbrownbenjaminb genomicselectionforyieldandseedcompositiontraitswithinanappliedsoybeanbreedingprogram AT songqijian genomicselectionforyieldandseedcompositiontraitswithinanappliedsoybeanbreedingprogram AT vaughnjustinn genomicselectionforyieldandseedcompositiontraitswithinanappliedsoybeanbreedingprogram AT lizenglu genomicselectionforyieldandseedcompositiontraitswithinanappliedsoybeanbreedingprogram |