Cargando…

Thermodynamics of the Binding of Lysozyme to a Dendritic Polyelectrolyte: Electrostatics Versus Hydration

[Image: see text] The interaction between dendritic polyglycerol sulfate (dPGS) of the second generation and lysozyme was studied by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) at different temperatures and salt concentrations. Analysis by ITC showed that 2–3 lysozyme molecules were bound to each dPGS. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ran, Qidi, Xu, Xiao, Dzubiella, Joachim, Haag, Rainer, Ballauff, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6644519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b01493
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] The interaction between dendritic polyglycerol sulfate (dPGS) of the second generation and lysozyme was studied by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) at different temperatures and salt concentrations. Analysis by ITC showed that 2–3 lysozyme molecules were bound to each dPGS. The resulting binding constant K(b) and the Gibbs free energy ΔG(o) decreased markedly with increasing salt concentration but were nearly independent of temperature. The salt dependence of K(b) led to the conclusion that ca. 3 counterions bound to dPGS were released upon complex formation. The gain in entropy ΔG(ci) by this counterion-release scales logarithmically with salt concentration and is the main driving force for binding. The temperature dependence of ΔG(o) was analyzed by the nonlinear van’t Hoff plot, taking into account a finite heat capacity change ΔC(p,vH). This evaluation led to the binding enthalpy ΔH(vH) and the binding entropy ΔS(vH). Both quantities varied strongly with temperature and even changed sign, but they compensated each other throughout the entire range of temperature. Coarse-grained computer simulations with explicit salt and implicit water were used to obtain the binding free energies that agreed with ITC results. Thus, electrostatic factors were the driving forces for binding whereas all hydration contributions leading to the strongly varying ΔH(vH) and ΔS(vH) canceled out. The calorimetric enthalpy ΔH(ITC) measured directly by ITC differed largely from ΔH(vH). ITC measurements done in two buffer systems with different ionization enthalpies revealed that binding was linked to buffer ionization and a partial protonation of the protein.