Cargando…
Comment on Theeuwes’s Characterization of Visual Selection
Theeuwes (2018, this issue) argues that the classic dichotomy describing the factors that guide attention (bottom-up and top-down) is inadequate and should be replaced by a trichotomy (bottom-up, top-down, and selection history). In contrast, I argue that top-down is a broad category that comfortabl...
Autor principal: | Egeth, Howard |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6644922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517199 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.29 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
por: Liesefeld, Heinrich R., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Reply to Theeuwes: Fast Feature-based Top-down Effects, but Saliency May be Slow
por: Becker, Stefanie I.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Attentional Window, Search Difficulty and Search Modes: A Reply to Commentaries on Theeuwes (2023)
por: Theeuwes, Jan
Publicado: (2023) -
Contextual and Temporal Constraints for Attentional Capture: Commentary on Theeuwes’ 2023 Review “The Attentional Capture Debate: When Can We Avoid Salient Distractors and when Not?”
por: Noonan, MaryAnn P., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A Critique of the Attentional Window Account of Capture Failures
por: Gaspelin, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2023)