Cargando…

Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods

[Image: see text] We tested a battery of density functional theory (DFT) methods ranging from generalized gradient approximation (GGA) via meta-GGA to hybrid meta-GGA schemes as well as Møller–Plesset perturbation theory of the second order and a single and double excitation coupled-cluster (CCSD) t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minenkov, Yury, Cavallo, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01203
_version_ 1783437415259570176
author Minenkov, Yury
Cavallo, Luigi
author_facet Minenkov, Yury
Cavallo, Luigi
author_sort Minenkov, Yury
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] We tested a battery of density functional theory (DFT) methods ranging from generalized gradient approximation (GGA) via meta-GGA to hybrid meta-GGA schemes as well as Møller–Plesset perturbation theory of the second order and a single and double excitation coupled-cluster (CCSD) theory for their ability to reproduce accurate gas-phase structures of di- and triatomic molecules derived from microwave spectroscopy. We obtained the most accurate molecular structures using the hybrid and hybrid meta-GGA approximations with B3PW91, APF, TPSSh, mPW1PW91, PBE0, mPW1PBE, B972, and B98 functionals, resulting in lowest errors. We recommend using these methods to predict accurate three-dimensional structures of inorganic molecules when intramolecular dispersion interactions play an insignificant role. The structures that the CCSD method predicts are of similar quality although at considerably larger computational cost. The structures that GGA and meta-GGA schemes predict are less accurate with the largest absolute errors detected with BLYP and M11-L, suggesting that these methods should not be used if accurate three-dimensional molecular structures are required. Because of numerical problems related to the integration of the exchange–correlation part of the functional and large scattering of errors, most of the Minnesota models tested, particularly MN12-L, M11, M06-L, SOGGA11, and VSXC, are also not recommended for geometry optimization. When maintaining a low computational budget is essential, the nonseparable gradient functional N12 might work within an acceptable range of error. As expected, the DFT-D3 dispersion correction had a negligible effect on the internuclear distances when combined with the functionals tested on nonweakly bonded di- and triatomic inorganic molecules. By contrast, the dispersion correction for the APF-D functional has been found to shorten the bonds significantly, up to 0.064 Å (AgI), in Ag halides, BaO, BaS, BaF, BaCl, Cu halides, and Li and Na halides and hydrides. These results do not agree well with very accurate structures derived from microwave spectroscopy; we therefore believe that the dispersion correction in the APF-D method should be reconsidered. Finally, we found that inaccurate structures can easily lead to errors of few kcal/mol in single-point energies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6645218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66452182019-08-27 Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods Minenkov, Yury Cavallo, Luigi ACS Omega [Image: see text] We tested a battery of density functional theory (DFT) methods ranging from generalized gradient approximation (GGA) via meta-GGA to hybrid meta-GGA schemes as well as Møller–Plesset perturbation theory of the second order and a single and double excitation coupled-cluster (CCSD) theory for their ability to reproduce accurate gas-phase structures of di- and triatomic molecules derived from microwave spectroscopy. We obtained the most accurate molecular structures using the hybrid and hybrid meta-GGA approximations with B3PW91, APF, TPSSh, mPW1PW91, PBE0, mPW1PBE, B972, and B98 functionals, resulting in lowest errors. We recommend using these methods to predict accurate three-dimensional structures of inorganic molecules when intramolecular dispersion interactions play an insignificant role. The structures that the CCSD method predicts are of similar quality although at considerably larger computational cost. The structures that GGA and meta-GGA schemes predict are less accurate with the largest absolute errors detected with BLYP and M11-L, suggesting that these methods should not be used if accurate three-dimensional molecular structures are required. Because of numerical problems related to the integration of the exchange–correlation part of the functional and large scattering of errors, most of the Minnesota models tested, particularly MN12-L, M11, M06-L, SOGGA11, and VSXC, are also not recommended for geometry optimization. When maintaining a low computational budget is essential, the nonseparable gradient functional N12 might work within an acceptable range of error. As expected, the DFT-D3 dispersion correction had a negligible effect on the internuclear distances when combined with the functionals tested on nonweakly bonded di- and triatomic inorganic molecules. By contrast, the dispersion correction for the APF-D functional has been found to shorten the bonds significantly, up to 0.064 Å (AgI), in Ag halides, BaO, BaS, BaF, BaCl, Cu halides, and Li and Na halides and hydrides. These results do not agree well with very accurate structures derived from microwave spectroscopy; we therefore believe that the dispersion correction in the APF-D method should be reconsidered. Finally, we found that inaccurate structures can easily lead to errors of few kcal/mol in single-point energies. American Chemical Society 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6645218/ /pubmed/31457376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01203 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Minenkov, Yury
Cavallo, Luigi
Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods
title Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods
title_full Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods
title_fullStr Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods
title_full_unstemmed Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods
title_short Ground-State Gas-Phase Structures of Inorganic Molecules Predicted by Density Functional Theory Methods
title_sort ground-state gas-phase structures of inorganic molecules predicted by density functional theory methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01203
work_keys_str_mv AT minenkovyury groundstategasphasestructuresofinorganicmoleculespredictedbydensityfunctionaltheorymethods
AT cavalloluigi groundstategasphasestructuresofinorganicmoleculespredictedbydensityfunctionaltheorymethods