Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in preventing occlusal caries is a well-established fact. Considering the difficulty in achieving strict isolation for a longer duration while treating the pediatric patients, a simplified procedure of sealant application is desirable. While, a se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Dhruv, Mahabala, Karuna, Lewis, Amita, Natarajan, Srikant, Nayak, Anupama, Rao, Ashwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346375
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55624
_version_ 1783437424721920000
author Garg, Dhruv
Mahabala, Karuna
Lewis, Amita
Natarajan, Srikant
Nayak, Anupama
Rao, Ashwin
author_facet Garg, Dhruv
Mahabala, Karuna
Lewis, Amita
Natarajan, Srikant
Nayak, Anupama
Rao, Ashwin
author_sort Garg, Dhruv
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in preventing occlusal caries is a well-established fact. Considering the difficulty in achieving strict isolation for a longer duration while treating the pediatric patients, a simplified procedure of sealant application is desirable. While, a self-etching sealant, Prevent Seal offers a quick procedure, the physical properties of this material haven’t been studied yet. Thus, this study was aimed to comparatively evaluate sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self-etching pit and fissure sealant and a conventional resin sealant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an in vitrointergroup comparative study, which consisted of 2 groups- Group I (Conventional acid etch sealant, Clinpro) and Group II (Self etching sealant, Prevent Seal). Out of 32 selected teeth 16 were used to study microleakage, with the help of dye penetration test using Övrebö and Raadal criteria. Remaining 16 were used to evaluate sealant penetration and adaptation viz bubbles in the bottom of fissure, debris in the fissure, tags in the bottom of the fissure and tags at cuspal slopes and fissure entrance was done using stereomicroscope. Post stereomicroscopic evaluation 4 samples each were randomly chosen from both the groups and checked for etching pattern using Scanning electronic microscope. RESULTS: The comparison of tested properties between the groups was done using Chi square test. There was no statistically significant difference observed when microleakage and sealant penetration / adaptation properties were compared between two groups (p=0.63 and p= 0.131, 0.131, 0.302, 0.106 respectively). No conclusive results could be withdrawn while etching patterns were compared between the groups (p=0.717). CONCLUSIONS: The self-etching sealant Prevent seal was found to have similar microleakage, sealant penetration and adaptation properties as conventional acid etch sealant. Key words:Pit and fissure sealant, self-etching, scanning electron microscope, sealing ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6645258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66452582019-07-25 Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses Garg, Dhruv Mahabala, Karuna Lewis, Amita Natarajan, Srikant Nayak, Anupama Rao, Ashwin J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in preventing occlusal caries is a well-established fact. Considering the difficulty in achieving strict isolation for a longer duration while treating the pediatric patients, a simplified procedure of sealant application is desirable. While, a self-etching sealant, Prevent Seal offers a quick procedure, the physical properties of this material haven’t been studied yet. Thus, this study was aimed to comparatively evaluate sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self-etching pit and fissure sealant and a conventional resin sealant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an in vitrointergroup comparative study, which consisted of 2 groups- Group I (Conventional acid etch sealant, Clinpro) and Group II (Self etching sealant, Prevent Seal). Out of 32 selected teeth 16 were used to study microleakage, with the help of dye penetration test using Övrebö and Raadal criteria. Remaining 16 were used to evaluate sealant penetration and adaptation viz bubbles in the bottom of fissure, debris in the fissure, tags in the bottom of the fissure and tags at cuspal slopes and fissure entrance was done using stereomicroscope. Post stereomicroscopic evaluation 4 samples each were randomly chosen from both the groups and checked for etching pattern using Scanning electronic microscope. RESULTS: The comparison of tested properties between the groups was done using Chi square test. There was no statistically significant difference observed when microleakage and sealant penetration / adaptation properties were compared between two groups (p=0.63 and p= 0.131, 0.131, 0.302, 0.106 respectively). No conclusive results could be withdrawn while etching patterns were compared between the groups (p=0.717). CONCLUSIONS: The self-etching sealant Prevent seal was found to have similar microleakage, sealant penetration and adaptation properties as conventional acid etch sealant. Key words:Pit and fissure sealant, self-etching, scanning electron microscope, sealing ability. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6645258/ /pubmed/31346375 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55624 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Garg, Dhruv
Mahabala, Karuna
Lewis, Amita
Natarajan, Srikant
Nayak, Anupama
Rao, Ashwin
Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
title Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
title_full Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
title_short Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
title_sort comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346375
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55624
work_keys_str_mv AT gargdhruv comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitypenetrationandadaptationofaselfetchingpitandfissuresealantstereomicroscopicandscanningelectronmicroscopicanalyses
AT mahabalakaruna comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitypenetrationandadaptationofaselfetchingpitandfissuresealantstereomicroscopicandscanningelectronmicroscopicanalyses
AT lewisamita comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitypenetrationandadaptationofaselfetchingpitandfissuresealantstereomicroscopicandscanningelectronmicroscopicanalyses
AT natarajansrikant comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitypenetrationandadaptationofaselfetchingpitandfissuresealantstereomicroscopicandscanningelectronmicroscopicanalyses
AT nayakanupama comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitypenetrationandadaptationofaselfetchingpitandfissuresealantstereomicroscopicandscanningelectronmicroscopicanalyses
AT raoashwin comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitypenetrationandadaptationofaselfetchingpitandfissuresealantstereomicroscopicandscanningelectronmicroscopicanalyses