Cargando…
Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
PURPOSE: This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiot...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220039 |
_version_ | 1783437514297573376 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Chang Heon Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jung-in Park, Jong Min |
author_facet | Choi, Chang Heon Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jung-in Park, Jong Min |
author_sort | Choi, Chang Heon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS: Twenty patients with thoracic spine metastasis were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, the MR-linac-IMRT, MR-Co-60-IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and structures, except for the spinal cord and spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV). Those two structures were contoured based on CT image sets for VMAT planning while those were contoured based on MR image sets for MR-linac-IMRT and MR-Co-60-IMRT planning. The initial prescription doses were 18 Gy in a single fraction for every plan in this study. If the tolerance level of the spinal cord was not met, the prescription doses were reduced to meet the tolerance level of the spinal cord. Dose-volumetric parameters of each plan were analyzed. RESULTS: The average spinal cord volumes contoured based on the CT and MR images were 3.8±1.6 cm(3) and 1.1±1.0 cm(3), respectively (p<0.001). For four patients, the prescription doses of VMAT plans were reduced to 16 Gy to satisfy the spinal cord tolerance level. For thirteen patients, the prescription doses of MR-Co-60-IMRT plans were reduced to be less than 16 Gy to meet the spinal cord tolerance level. However, for every MR-linac-IMRT plan, the initial prescription doses of 18 Gy could be delivered to the target volume while satisfying the spinal cord tolerance. The average values of D(10%), V(10Gy), and V(14Gy) of the spinal cord PRV consistently indicated that the doses to the spinal cord PRV in the MR-linac-IMRT plans were the lowest among three types of plans in this study (all with p≤0.003). CONCLUSION: MR-linac-IMRT appears promising for spine SABR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6645671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66456712019-07-25 Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR Choi, Chang Heon Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jung-in Park, Jong Min PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS: Twenty patients with thoracic spine metastasis were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, the MR-linac-IMRT, MR-Co-60-IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and structures, except for the spinal cord and spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV). Those two structures were contoured based on CT image sets for VMAT planning while those were contoured based on MR image sets for MR-linac-IMRT and MR-Co-60-IMRT planning. The initial prescription doses were 18 Gy in a single fraction for every plan in this study. If the tolerance level of the spinal cord was not met, the prescription doses were reduced to meet the tolerance level of the spinal cord. Dose-volumetric parameters of each plan were analyzed. RESULTS: The average spinal cord volumes contoured based on the CT and MR images were 3.8±1.6 cm(3) and 1.1±1.0 cm(3), respectively (p<0.001). For four patients, the prescription doses of VMAT plans were reduced to 16 Gy to satisfy the spinal cord tolerance level. For thirteen patients, the prescription doses of MR-Co-60-IMRT plans were reduced to be less than 16 Gy to meet the spinal cord tolerance level. However, for every MR-linac-IMRT plan, the initial prescription doses of 18 Gy could be delivered to the target volume while satisfying the spinal cord tolerance. The average values of D(10%), V(10Gy), and V(14Gy) of the spinal cord PRV consistently indicated that the doses to the spinal cord PRV in the MR-linac-IMRT plans were the lowest among three types of plans in this study (all with p≤0.003). CONCLUSION: MR-linac-IMRT appears promising for spine SABR. Public Library of Science 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6645671/ /pubmed/31329641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220039 Text en © 2019 Choi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Choi, Chang Heon Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jung-in Park, Jong Min Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR |
title | Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR |
title_full | Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR |
title_fullStr | Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR |
title_short | Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR |
title_sort | comparison of treatment plan quality among mri-based imrt with a linac, mri-based imrt with tri-co-60 sources, and vmat for spine sabr |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choichangheon comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr AT kimjinho comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr AT kimjungin comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr AT parkjongmin comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr |