Cargando…

Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR

PURPOSE: This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Chang Heon, Kim, Jin Ho, Kim, Jung-in, Park, Jong Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220039
_version_ 1783437514297573376
author Choi, Chang Heon
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Jung-in
Park, Jong Min
author_facet Choi, Chang Heon
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Jung-in
Park, Jong Min
author_sort Choi, Chang Heon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS: Twenty patients with thoracic spine metastasis were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, the MR-linac-IMRT, MR-Co-60-IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and structures, except for the spinal cord and spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV). Those two structures were contoured based on CT image sets for VMAT planning while those were contoured based on MR image sets for MR-linac-IMRT and MR-Co-60-IMRT planning. The initial prescription doses were 18 Gy in a single fraction for every plan in this study. If the tolerance level of the spinal cord was not met, the prescription doses were reduced to meet the tolerance level of the spinal cord. Dose-volumetric parameters of each plan were analyzed. RESULTS: The average spinal cord volumes contoured based on the CT and MR images were 3.8±1.6 cm(3) and 1.1±1.0 cm(3), respectively (p<0.001). For four patients, the prescription doses of VMAT plans were reduced to 16 Gy to satisfy the spinal cord tolerance level. For thirteen patients, the prescription doses of MR-Co-60-IMRT plans were reduced to be less than 16 Gy to meet the spinal cord tolerance level. However, for every MR-linac-IMRT plan, the initial prescription doses of 18 Gy could be delivered to the target volume while satisfying the spinal cord tolerance. The average values of D(10%), V(10Gy), and V(14Gy) of the spinal cord PRV consistently indicated that the doses to the spinal cord PRV in the MR-linac-IMRT plans were the lowest among three types of plans in this study (all with p≤0.003). CONCLUSION: MR-linac-IMRT appears promising for spine SABR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6645671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66456712019-07-25 Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR Choi, Chang Heon Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jung-in Park, Jong Min PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS: Twenty patients with thoracic spine metastasis were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, the MR-linac-IMRT, MR-Co-60-IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and structures, except for the spinal cord and spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV). Those two structures were contoured based on CT image sets for VMAT planning while those were contoured based on MR image sets for MR-linac-IMRT and MR-Co-60-IMRT planning. The initial prescription doses were 18 Gy in a single fraction for every plan in this study. If the tolerance level of the spinal cord was not met, the prescription doses were reduced to meet the tolerance level of the spinal cord. Dose-volumetric parameters of each plan were analyzed. RESULTS: The average spinal cord volumes contoured based on the CT and MR images were 3.8±1.6 cm(3) and 1.1±1.0 cm(3), respectively (p<0.001). For four patients, the prescription doses of VMAT plans were reduced to 16 Gy to satisfy the spinal cord tolerance level. For thirteen patients, the prescription doses of MR-Co-60-IMRT plans were reduced to be less than 16 Gy to meet the spinal cord tolerance level. However, for every MR-linac-IMRT plan, the initial prescription doses of 18 Gy could be delivered to the target volume while satisfying the spinal cord tolerance. The average values of D(10%), V(10Gy), and V(14Gy) of the spinal cord PRV consistently indicated that the doses to the spinal cord PRV in the MR-linac-IMRT plans were the lowest among three types of plans in this study (all with p≤0.003). CONCLUSION: MR-linac-IMRT appears promising for spine SABR. Public Library of Science 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6645671/ /pubmed/31329641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220039 Text en © 2019 Choi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Chang Heon
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Jung-in
Park, Jong Min
Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
title Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
title_full Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
title_short Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR
title_sort comparison of treatment plan quality among mri-based imrt with a linac, mri-based imrt with tri-co-60 sources, and vmat for spine sabr
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220039
work_keys_str_mv AT choichangheon comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr
AT kimjinho comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr
AT kimjungin comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr
AT parkjongmin comparisonoftreatmentplanqualityamongmribasedimrtwithalinacmribasedimrtwithtrico60sourcesandvmatforspinesabr