Cargando…

Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa

INTRODUCTION: In South Africa there is an easy access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicines and expenditure is high. Certain OTC products are available to the public in general stores, while others may only be available at pharmacies. It is also common for OTC medicines to be prescribed by a doctor fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padayachee, Neelaveni, Rothberg, Alan D, Truter, Ilse, Butkow, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410069
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S194347
_version_ 1783437515935449088
author Padayachee, Neelaveni
Rothberg, Alan D
Truter, Ilse
Butkow, Neil
author_facet Padayachee, Neelaveni
Rothberg, Alan D
Truter, Ilse
Butkow, Neil
author_sort Padayachee, Neelaveni
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In South Africa there is an easy access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicines and expenditure is high. Certain OTC products are available to the public in general stores, while others may only be available at pharmacies. It is also common for OTC medicines to be prescribed by a doctor for treatment of minor illnesses. Individuals with medical insurance usually have cover for these products, but typically only to a limited extent. AIM: To investigate the utilization patterns in two medical insurance schemes of OTC analgesic products in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) category N02BE51 which includes medicines containing paracetamol and varying combinations of codeine, caffeine and antihistamines. METHODOLOGY: Data were obtained for two benefit plans, one with generous, high benefits (HI), the other with lower benefits (LO). Data covered utilization of OTC medicines in the N02BE51 group, indicating whether the medicines were purchased at a pharmacy or dispensed by a doctor. Doctors were further categorised as contracted/network or non-network providers. Product costs and volumes were analysed according to access directly by the beneficiary, recommendation by a pharmacist, or prescription from a doctor. RESULTS: Compared to doctors, pharmacists issued more-expensive products. Average costs were higher in the HI plan compared to the LO plan. Pharmacists showed a preference for dispensing larger and more expensive pack sizes. Doctors showed better cost containment: the average cost of products in HI was twice that of LO. Doctors dispensing directly to patients issued smaller pack sizes and lower-priced products. Contracted network doctors did not appear to impact on costs. CONCLUSION: Among the privately-insured individuals studied, the avaiIability, cost and formulation of N02BE51 OTC products appeared to be poorly regulated, whether by the consumer, pharmacist, medical insurance scheme or legislation. Doctors demonstrate better cost containment by prescribing less costly, smaller pack-size alternatives compared to pharmacists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6645681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66456812019-08-13 Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa Padayachee, Neelaveni Rothberg, Alan D Truter, Ilse Butkow, Neil Drug Healthc Patient Saf Original Research INTRODUCTION: In South Africa there is an easy access to over-the-counter (OTC) medicines and expenditure is high. Certain OTC products are available to the public in general stores, while others may only be available at pharmacies. It is also common for OTC medicines to be prescribed by a doctor for treatment of minor illnesses. Individuals with medical insurance usually have cover for these products, but typically only to a limited extent. AIM: To investigate the utilization patterns in two medical insurance schemes of OTC analgesic products in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) category N02BE51 which includes medicines containing paracetamol and varying combinations of codeine, caffeine and antihistamines. METHODOLOGY: Data were obtained for two benefit plans, one with generous, high benefits (HI), the other with lower benefits (LO). Data covered utilization of OTC medicines in the N02BE51 group, indicating whether the medicines were purchased at a pharmacy or dispensed by a doctor. Doctors were further categorised as contracted/network or non-network providers. Product costs and volumes were analysed according to access directly by the beneficiary, recommendation by a pharmacist, or prescription from a doctor. RESULTS: Compared to doctors, pharmacists issued more-expensive products. Average costs were higher in the HI plan compared to the LO plan. Pharmacists showed a preference for dispensing larger and more expensive pack sizes. Doctors showed better cost containment: the average cost of products in HI was twice that of LO. Doctors dispensing directly to patients issued smaller pack sizes and lower-priced products. Contracted network doctors did not appear to impact on costs. CONCLUSION: Among the privately-insured individuals studied, the avaiIability, cost and formulation of N02BE51 OTC products appeared to be poorly regulated, whether by the consumer, pharmacist, medical insurance scheme or legislation. Doctors demonstrate better cost containment by prescribing less costly, smaller pack-size alternatives compared to pharmacists. Dove 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6645681/ /pubmed/31410069 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S194347 Text en © 2019 Padayachee et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Padayachee, Neelaveni
Rothberg, Alan D
Truter, Ilse
Butkow, Neil
Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa
title Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa
title_full Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa
title_fullStr Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa
title_short Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa
title_sort utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6645681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410069
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S194347
work_keys_str_mv AT padayacheeneelaveni utilizationofoverthecounteranalgesicsintwoprivatemedicalinsuranceschemesinsouthafrica
AT rothbergaland utilizationofoverthecounteranalgesicsintwoprivatemedicalinsuranceschemesinsouthafrica
AT truterilse utilizationofoverthecounteranalgesicsintwoprivatemedicalinsuranceschemesinsouthafrica
AT butkowneil utilizationofoverthecounteranalgesicsintwoprivatemedicalinsuranceschemesinsouthafrica