Cargando…
Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566 |
_version_ | 1783437595581087744 |
---|---|
author | Hilton, Matt Räling, Romy Wartenburger, Isabell Elsner, Birgit |
author_facet | Hilton, Matt Räling, Romy Wartenburger, Isabell Elsner, Birgit |
author_sort | Hilton, Matt |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise) mark boundaries between words and phrases, while boundaries between actions of an action sequence can be marked by kinematic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary deceleration). The processing of prosodic boundary cues evokes an Event-related Potentials (ERP) component known as the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), and it is possible that the CPS reflects domain-general cognitive processes involved in segmentation, given that the CPS is also evoked by boundaries between subunits of non-speech auditory stimuli. This study further probed the domain-generality of the CPS and its underlying processes by investigating electrophysiological correlates of the processing of boundary cues in sequences of spoken verbs (auditory stimuli; Experiment 1; N = 23 adults) and actions (visual stimuli; Experiment 2; N = 23 adults). The EEG data from both experiments revealed a CPS-like broadly distributed positivity during the 250 ms prior to the onset of the post-boundary word or action, indicating similar electrophysiological correlates of boundary processing across domains, suggesting that the cognitive processes underlying speech and action segmentation might also be shared. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6646704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66467042019-08-02 Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action Hilton, Matt Räling, Romy Wartenburger, Isabell Elsner, Birgit Front Psychol Psychology Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise) mark boundaries between words and phrases, while boundaries between actions of an action sequence can be marked by kinematic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary deceleration). The processing of prosodic boundary cues evokes an Event-related Potentials (ERP) component known as the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), and it is possible that the CPS reflects domain-general cognitive processes involved in segmentation, given that the CPS is also evoked by boundaries between subunits of non-speech auditory stimuli. This study further probed the domain-generality of the CPS and its underlying processes by investigating electrophysiological correlates of the processing of boundary cues in sequences of spoken verbs (auditory stimuli; Experiment 1; N = 23 adults) and actions (visual stimuli; Experiment 2; N = 23 adults). The EEG data from both experiments revealed a CPS-like broadly distributed positivity during the 250 ms prior to the onset of the post-boundary word or action, indicating similar electrophysiological correlates of boundary processing across domains, suggesting that the cognitive processes underlying speech and action segmentation might also be shared. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6646704/ /pubmed/31379649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hilton, Räling, Wartenburger and Elsner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hilton, Matt Räling, Romy Wartenburger, Isabell Elsner, Birgit Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action |
title | Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action |
title_full | Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action |
title_fullStr | Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action |
title_full_unstemmed | Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action |
title_short | Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action |
title_sort | parallels in processing boundary cues in speech and action |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiltonmatt parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction AT ralingromy parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction AT wartenburgerisabell parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction AT elsnerbirgit parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction |