Cargando…

Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action

Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilton, Matt, Räling, Romy, Wartenburger, Isabell, Elsner, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566
_version_ 1783437595581087744
author Hilton, Matt
Räling, Romy
Wartenburger, Isabell
Elsner, Birgit
author_facet Hilton, Matt
Räling, Romy
Wartenburger, Isabell
Elsner, Birgit
author_sort Hilton, Matt
collection PubMed
description Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise) mark boundaries between words and phrases, while boundaries between actions of an action sequence can be marked by kinematic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary deceleration). The processing of prosodic boundary cues evokes an Event-related Potentials (ERP) component known as the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), and it is possible that the CPS reflects domain-general cognitive processes involved in segmentation, given that the CPS is also evoked by boundaries between subunits of non-speech auditory stimuli. This study further probed the domain-generality of the CPS and its underlying processes by investigating electrophysiological correlates of the processing of boundary cues in sequences of spoken verbs (auditory stimuli; Experiment 1; N = 23 adults) and actions (visual stimuli; Experiment 2; N = 23 adults). The EEG data from both experiments revealed a CPS-like broadly distributed positivity during the 250 ms prior to the onset of the post-boundary word or action, indicating similar electrophysiological correlates of boundary processing across domains, suggesting that the cognitive processes underlying speech and action segmentation might also be shared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6646704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66467042019-08-02 Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action Hilton, Matt Räling, Romy Wartenburger, Isabell Elsner, Birgit Front Psychol Psychology Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise) mark boundaries between words and phrases, while boundaries between actions of an action sequence can be marked by kinematic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary deceleration). The processing of prosodic boundary cues evokes an Event-related Potentials (ERP) component known as the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), and it is possible that the CPS reflects domain-general cognitive processes involved in segmentation, given that the CPS is also evoked by boundaries between subunits of non-speech auditory stimuli. This study further probed the domain-generality of the CPS and its underlying processes by investigating electrophysiological correlates of the processing of boundary cues in sequences of spoken verbs (auditory stimuli; Experiment 1; N = 23 adults) and actions (visual stimuli; Experiment 2; N = 23 adults). The EEG data from both experiments revealed a CPS-like broadly distributed positivity during the 250 ms prior to the onset of the post-boundary word or action, indicating similar electrophysiological correlates of boundary processing across domains, suggesting that the cognitive processes underlying speech and action segmentation might also be shared. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6646704/ /pubmed/31379649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hilton, Räling, Wartenburger and Elsner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hilton, Matt
Räling, Romy
Wartenburger, Isabell
Elsner, Birgit
Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
title Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
title_full Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
title_fullStr Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
title_full_unstemmed Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
title_short Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action
title_sort parallels in processing boundary cues in speech and action
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566
work_keys_str_mv AT hiltonmatt parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction
AT ralingromy parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction
AT wartenburgerisabell parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction
AT elsnerbirgit parallelsinprocessingboundarycuesinspeechandaction