Cargando…

FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images

BACKGROUND: Accurate segmentation of MS lesions on MRI is difficult and, if performed manually, time consuming. Automatic segmentations rely strongly on the image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Literature examining segmentation tool performances in real-world multi-site data acquisition setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, M., Tang, L.Y.W., Hernández-Torres, E., Jarrett, M., Brosch, T., Metz, L., Li, D.K.B., Traboulsee, A., Tam, R.C., Rauscher, A., Wiggermann, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101918
_version_ 1783437604916559872
author Le, M.
Tang, L.Y.W.
Hernández-Torres, E.
Jarrett, M.
Brosch, T.
Metz, L.
Li, D.K.B.
Traboulsee, A.
Tam, R.C.
Rauscher, A.
Wiggermann, V.
author_facet Le, M.
Tang, L.Y.W.
Hernández-Torres, E.
Jarrett, M.
Brosch, T.
Metz, L.
Li, D.K.B.
Traboulsee, A.
Tam, R.C.
Rauscher, A.
Wiggermann, V.
author_sort Le, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate segmentation of MS lesions on MRI is difficult and, if performed manually, time consuming. Automatic segmentations rely strongly on the image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Literature examining segmentation tool performances in real-world multi-site data acquisition settings is scarce. OBJECTIVE: FLAIR(2), a combination of T(2)-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, improves tissue contrast while suppressing CSF. We compared the use of FLAIR and FLAIR(2) in LesionTOADS, OASIS and the lesion segmentation toolbox (LST) when applied to non-homogenized, multi-center 2D-imaging data. METHODS: Lesions were segmented on 47 MS patient data sets obtained from 34 sites using LesionTOADS, OASIS and LST, and compared to a semi-automatically generated reference. The performance of FLAIR and FLAIR(2) was assessed using the relative lesion volume difference (LVD), Dice coefficient (DSC), sensitivity (SEN) and symmetric surface distance (SSD). Performance improvements related to lesion volumes (LVs) were evaluated for all tools. For comparison, LesionTOADS was also used to segment lesions from 3 T single-center MR data of 40 clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients. RESULTS: Compared to FLAIR, the use of FLAIR(2) in LesionTOADS led to improvements of 31.6% (LVD), 14.0% (DSC), 25.1% (SEN), and 47.0% (SSD) in the multi-center study. DSC and SSD significantly improved for larger LVs, while LVD and SEN were enhanced independent of LV. OASIS showed little difference between FLAIR and FLAIR(2), likely due to its inherent use of T(2)w and FLAIR. LST replicated the benefits of FLAIR(2) only in part, indicating that further optimization, particularly at low LVs is needed. In the CIS study, LesionTOADS did not benefit from the use of FLAIR(2) as the segmentation performance for both FLAIR and FLAIR(2) was heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, multi-center experiment, FLAIR(2) outperformed FLAIR in its ability to segment MS lesions with LesionTOADS. The computation of FLAIR(2) enhanced lesion detection, at minimally increased computational time or cost, even retrospectively. Further work is needed to determine how LesionTOADS and other tools, such as LST, can optimally benefit from the improved FLAIR(2) contrast.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6646743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66467432019-07-31 FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images Le, M. Tang, L.Y.W. Hernández-Torres, E. Jarrett, M. Brosch, T. Metz, L. Li, D.K.B. Traboulsee, A. Tam, R.C. Rauscher, A. Wiggermann, V. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article BACKGROUND: Accurate segmentation of MS lesions on MRI is difficult and, if performed manually, time consuming. Automatic segmentations rely strongly on the image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Literature examining segmentation tool performances in real-world multi-site data acquisition settings is scarce. OBJECTIVE: FLAIR(2), a combination of T(2)-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, improves tissue contrast while suppressing CSF. We compared the use of FLAIR and FLAIR(2) in LesionTOADS, OASIS and the lesion segmentation toolbox (LST) when applied to non-homogenized, multi-center 2D-imaging data. METHODS: Lesions were segmented on 47 MS patient data sets obtained from 34 sites using LesionTOADS, OASIS and LST, and compared to a semi-automatically generated reference. The performance of FLAIR and FLAIR(2) was assessed using the relative lesion volume difference (LVD), Dice coefficient (DSC), sensitivity (SEN) and symmetric surface distance (SSD). Performance improvements related to lesion volumes (LVs) were evaluated for all tools. For comparison, LesionTOADS was also used to segment lesions from 3 T single-center MR data of 40 clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients. RESULTS: Compared to FLAIR, the use of FLAIR(2) in LesionTOADS led to improvements of 31.6% (LVD), 14.0% (DSC), 25.1% (SEN), and 47.0% (SSD) in the multi-center study. DSC and SSD significantly improved for larger LVs, while LVD and SEN were enhanced independent of LV. OASIS showed little difference between FLAIR and FLAIR(2), likely due to its inherent use of T(2)w and FLAIR. LST replicated the benefits of FLAIR(2) only in part, indicating that further optimization, particularly at low LVs is needed. In the CIS study, LesionTOADS did not benefit from the use of FLAIR(2) as the segmentation performance for both FLAIR and FLAIR(2) was heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, multi-center experiment, FLAIR(2) outperformed FLAIR in its ability to segment MS lesions with LesionTOADS. The computation of FLAIR(2) enhanced lesion detection, at minimally increased computational time or cost, even retrospectively. Further work is needed to determine how LesionTOADS and other tools, such as LST, can optimally benefit from the improved FLAIR(2) contrast. Elsevier 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6646743/ /pubmed/31491827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101918 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Le, M.
Tang, L.Y.W.
Hernández-Torres, E.
Jarrett, M.
Brosch, T.
Metz, L.
Li, D.K.B.
Traboulsee, A.
Tam, R.C.
Rauscher, A.
Wiggermann, V.
FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images
title FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images
title_full FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images
title_fullStr FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images
title_full_unstemmed FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images
title_short FLAIR(2) improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images
title_sort flair(2) improves lesiontoads automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2d clinical magnetic resonance images
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101918
work_keys_str_mv AT lem flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT tanglyw flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT hernandeztorrese flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT jarrettm flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT broscht flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT metzl flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT lidkb flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT traboulseea flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT tamrc flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT rauschera flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages
AT wiggermannv flair2improveslesiontoadsautomaticsegmentationofmultiplesclerosislesionsinnonhomogenizedmulticenter2dclinicalmagneticresonanceimages