Cargando…

Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Pedestrians are amongst the most vulnerable road users and their unsafe behaviors have a major impact on traffic injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the underlying psychological factors behind red light violation in pedestrians’ crossing behavior based on the Theory of Plann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshki, Mahdi, Abdoljavad, Khajavi, Leila, Doshmangir, Pour Doulati, Saeid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203305
http://dx.doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1184
_version_ 1783437608990277632
author Moshki, Mahdi
Abdoljavad, Khajavi
Leila, Doshmangir
Pour Doulati, Saeid
author_facet Moshki, Mahdi
Abdoljavad, Khajavi
Leila, Doshmangir
Pour Doulati, Saeid
author_sort Moshki, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pedestrians are amongst the most vulnerable road users and their unsafe behaviors have a major impact on traffic injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the underlying psychological factors behind red light violation in pedestrians’ crossing behavior based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and to provide recommendations for preventive interventions. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in Tabriz, one of the metropolitan cities of Iran. 30 pedestrians were individually interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended questions to elicit salient consequences, social referents, and circumstances regarding pedestrians’ red light crossing behavior. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis followed by frequency analysis in order to detect modal salient beliefs. RESULTS: A total number of 115 sub-categories were identified which were then classified in the ten predetermined categories of the Theory of Planned Behavior: advantages, disadvantages, positive feelings, negative feelings, approving referents, disapproving referents, behaving referents, not-behaving referents, facilitators, and barriers. “Saving time” was elicited as the most important both the advantage and the positive feeling. “Getting injured” was identified as the most serious disadvantage. “Lowering the level of culture” was obtained as the main negative feeling. “Friends/Peers” comprise the most prominent group among both the approving and the behaving referents, whereas “Family members” constituted the most significant group both among the disapproving and the not-behaving referents. “Being in a hurry” was introduced as the most substantial facilitator and “The fear of accident” was identified as the most influential deterrent factor. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the major findings, reducing pedestrians’ red light violations needs to focus: on the perceived negative and positive consequences and feelings of this behavior like getting injured, and saving time respectively; on the approval role of friends/peers, and the disapproval role of family; and on the fear of accident as a barrier, and rushing as a facilitating factor. More precise quantitative research is needed to determine the predictive power of these factors in such risky behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6646824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66468242019-07-29 Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study Moshki, Mahdi Abdoljavad, Khajavi Leila, Doshmangir Pour Doulati, Saeid J Inj Violence Res Injury &Violence BACKGROUND: Pedestrians are amongst the most vulnerable road users and their unsafe behaviors have a major impact on traffic injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the underlying psychological factors behind red light violation in pedestrians’ crossing behavior based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and to provide recommendations for preventive interventions. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in Tabriz, one of the metropolitan cities of Iran. 30 pedestrians were individually interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended questions to elicit salient consequences, social referents, and circumstances regarding pedestrians’ red light crossing behavior. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis followed by frequency analysis in order to detect modal salient beliefs. RESULTS: A total number of 115 sub-categories were identified which were then classified in the ten predetermined categories of the Theory of Planned Behavior: advantages, disadvantages, positive feelings, negative feelings, approving referents, disapproving referents, behaving referents, not-behaving referents, facilitators, and barriers. “Saving time” was elicited as the most important both the advantage and the positive feeling. “Getting injured” was identified as the most serious disadvantage. “Lowering the level of culture” was obtained as the main negative feeling. “Friends/Peers” comprise the most prominent group among both the approving and the behaving referents, whereas “Family members” constituted the most significant group both among the disapproving and the not-behaving referents. “Being in a hurry” was introduced as the most substantial facilitator and “The fear of accident” was identified as the most influential deterrent factor. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the major findings, reducing pedestrians’ red light violations needs to focus: on the perceived negative and positive consequences and feelings of this behavior like getting injured, and saving time respectively; on the approval role of friends/peers, and the disapproval role of family; and on the fear of accident as a barrier, and rushing as a facilitating factor. More precise quantitative research is needed to determine the predictive power of these factors in such risky behavior. Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6646824/ /pubmed/31203305 http://dx.doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1184 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Injury &Violence
Moshki, Mahdi
Abdoljavad, Khajavi
Leila, Doshmangir
Pour Doulati, Saeid
Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
title Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
title_full Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
title_short Red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
title_sort red light violation and pedestrians’ modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study
topic Injury &Violence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203305
http://dx.doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1184
work_keys_str_mv AT moshkimahdi redlightviolationandpedestriansmodalsalientbeliefsaboutunsaferoadcrossingbehavioraqualitativestudy
AT abdoljavadkhajavi redlightviolationandpedestriansmodalsalientbeliefsaboutunsaferoadcrossingbehavioraqualitativestudy
AT leiladoshmangir redlightviolationandpedestriansmodalsalientbeliefsaboutunsaferoadcrossingbehavioraqualitativestudy
AT pourdoulatisaeid redlightviolationandpedestriansmodalsalientbeliefsaboutunsaferoadcrossingbehavioraqualitativestudy