Cargando…

Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting

OBJECTIVE: Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masyn, Serge, Vuchelen, Anneleen, Santermans, Eva, Rasschaert, Freya, Bangura, Allieu, Parys, Wim, Rutten, Romain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8
_version_ 1783437644874645504
author Masyn, Serge
Vuchelen, Anneleen
Santermans, Eva
Rasschaert, Freya
Bangura, Allieu
Parys, Wim
Rutten, Romain
author_facet Masyn, Serge
Vuchelen, Anneleen
Santermans, Eva
Rasschaert, Freya
Bangura, Allieu
Parys, Wim
Rutten, Romain
author_sort Masyn, Serge
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants’ irises were captured using a camera, while a survey assessed the ease of use with children. RESULTS: The image capture success rate per individual was high; 86.0% of the participants had ≥ 2 successful captures. Iris scan quality and surface were similar in all age groups and in the matching population database. When including feasibility in the analysis of minors aged 3–4, sensitivity and specificity were non-inferior compared to using the biometric of a guardian. However, the quality of iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 was worse than the iris scanning reference quality in adults. A mean total usability score of 1.55 ± 0.27 was calculated; a usability threshold of 1.45 is required for routine use. Overall, this technique is feasible in minors aged 3–4, replacing the use of guardian biometrics. Additional work is ongoing to improve this technique further, striving for uniformity from the age of 1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66470562019-07-31 Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting Masyn, Serge Vuchelen, Anneleen Santermans, Eva Rasschaert, Freya Bangura, Allieu Parys, Wim Rutten, Romain BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants’ irises were captured using a camera, while a survey assessed the ease of use with children. RESULTS: The image capture success rate per individual was high; 86.0% of the participants had ≥ 2 successful captures. Iris scan quality and surface were similar in all age groups and in the matching population database. When including feasibility in the analysis of minors aged 3–4, sensitivity and specificity were non-inferior compared to using the biometric of a guardian. However, the quality of iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 was worse than the iris scanning reference quality in adults. A mean total usability score of 1.55 ± 0.27 was calculated; a usability threshold of 1.45 is required for routine use. Overall, this technique is feasible in minors aged 3–4, replacing the use of guardian biometrics. Additional work is ongoing to improve this technique further, striving for uniformity from the age of 1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6647056/ /pubmed/31331369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Masyn, Serge
Vuchelen, Anneleen
Santermans, Eva
Rasschaert, Freya
Bangura, Allieu
Parys, Wim
Rutten, Romain
Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
title Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
title_full Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
title_fullStr Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
title_full_unstemmed Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
title_short Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
title_sort overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8
work_keys_str_mv AT masynserge overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting
AT vuchelenanneleen overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting
AT santermanseva overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting
AT rasschaertfreya overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting
AT banguraallieu overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting
AT paryswim overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting
AT ruttenromain overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting