Cargando…
Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting
OBJECTIVE: Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants’...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8 |
_version_ | 1783437644874645504 |
---|---|
author | Masyn, Serge Vuchelen, Anneleen Santermans, Eva Rasschaert, Freya Bangura, Allieu Parys, Wim Rutten, Romain |
author_facet | Masyn, Serge Vuchelen, Anneleen Santermans, Eva Rasschaert, Freya Bangura, Allieu Parys, Wim Rutten, Romain |
author_sort | Masyn, Serge |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants’ irises were captured using a camera, while a survey assessed the ease of use with children. RESULTS: The image capture success rate per individual was high; 86.0% of the participants had ≥ 2 successful captures. Iris scan quality and surface were similar in all age groups and in the matching population database. When including feasibility in the analysis of minors aged 3–4, sensitivity and specificity were non-inferior compared to using the biometric of a guardian. However, the quality of iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 was worse than the iris scanning reference quality in adults. A mean total usability score of 1.55 ± 0.27 was calculated; a usability threshold of 1.45 is required for routine use. Overall, this technique is feasible in minors aged 3–4, replacing the use of guardian biometrics. Additional work is ongoing to improve this technique further, striving for uniformity from the age of 1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66470562019-07-31 Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting Masyn, Serge Vuchelen, Anneleen Santermans, Eva Rasschaert, Freya Bangura, Allieu Parys, Wim Rutten, Romain BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants’ irises were captured using a camera, while a survey assessed the ease of use with children. RESULTS: The image capture success rate per individual was high; 86.0% of the participants had ≥ 2 successful captures. Iris scan quality and surface were similar in all age groups and in the matching population database. When including feasibility in the analysis of minors aged 3–4, sensitivity and specificity were non-inferior compared to using the biometric of a guardian. However, the quality of iris scanning in minors aged 1–4 was worse than the iris scanning reference quality in adults. A mean total usability score of 1.55 ± 0.27 was calculated; a usability threshold of 1.45 is required for routine use. Overall, this technique is feasible in minors aged 3–4, replacing the use of guardian biometrics. Additional work is ongoing to improve this technique further, striving for uniformity from the age of 1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6647056/ /pubmed/31331369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Masyn, Serge Vuchelen, Anneleen Santermans, Eva Rasschaert, Freya Bangura, Allieu Parys, Wim Rutten, Romain Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
title | Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
title_full | Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
title_fullStr | Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
title_short | Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
title_sort | overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masynserge overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting AT vuchelenanneleen overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting AT santermanseva overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting AT rasschaertfreya overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting AT banguraallieu overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting AT paryswim overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting AT ruttenromain overcomingthechallengesofirisscanningtoidentifyminors14yearsintherealworldsetting |