Cargando…
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9 |
_version_ | 1783437666700754944 |
---|---|
author | Gajewski, Jakub Cheelo, Mweene Bijlmakers, Leon Kachimba, John Pittalis, Chiara Brugha, Ruairi |
author_facet | Gajewski, Jakub Cheelo, Mweene Bijlmakers, Leon Kachimba, John Pittalis, Chiara Brugha, Ruairi |
author_sort | Gajewski, Jakub |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess their contribution to the delivery of surgical care in rural hospitals in Zambia. METHODS: Sixteen hospitals were randomly assigned to intervention and control arms of the study. Nine MLs were deployed to eight intervention sites. Crude numbers of selected major surgical procedures between intervention and control sites were compared before and after the intervention. Volume and outcomes of surgery were compared within intervention hospitals, between NPCs and surgically active medical doctors (MDs). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the numbers of caesarean sections (CS) in the intervention hospitals (+ 15.2%) and a drop by almost half in the control group (− 47%) (P = 0.015), between the two time periods. There were marginal shifts in the numbers of index procedures: a small drop in the intervention group (− 4.9%) and slight increase in the control arm (+ 4.8%) (P = 0.505). In all pairs, MLs had higher mean number of CS and other major surgical cases done in the intervention period compared with MDs. There was no significant difference in postoperative wound infection rates for CS (P = 0.884) and other major surgical cases (P = 0.33) at intervention hospitals between MLs and MDs. CONCLUSION: This study provided evidence that the ML training programme in Zambia is an effective and safe way to bridge the gap in rural hospitals between the demand and the limited availability of surgically trained workforce in the country. Such evidence is greatly needed as more developing countries are developing national surgical plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66099597 Registered: 07/01/2014 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66471492019-07-31 The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial Gajewski, Jakub Cheelo, Mweene Bijlmakers, Leon Kachimba, John Pittalis, Chiara Brugha, Ruairi Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess their contribution to the delivery of surgical care in rural hospitals in Zambia. METHODS: Sixteen hospitals were randomly assigned to intervention and control arms of the study. Nine MLs were deployed to eight intervention sites. Crude numbers of selected major surgical procedures between intervention and control sites were compared before and after the intervention. Volume and outcomes of surgery were compared within intervention hospitals, between NPCs and surgically active medical doctors (MDs). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the numbers of caesarean sections (CS) in the intervention hospitals (+ 15.2%) and a drop by almost half in the control group (− 47%) (P = 0.015), between the two time periods. There were marginal shifts in the numbers of index procedures: a small drop in the intervention group (− 4.9%) and slight increase in the control arm (+ 4.8%) (P = 0.505). In all pairs, MLs had higher mean number of CS and other major surgical cases done in the intervention period compared with MDs. There was no significant difference in postoperative wound infection rates for CS (P = 0.884) and other major surgical cases (P = 0.33) at intervention hospitals between MLs and MDs. CONCLUSION: This study provided evidence that the ML training programme in Zambia is an effective and safe way to bridge the gap in rural hospitals between the demand and the limited availability of surgically trained workforce in the country. Such evidence is greatly needed as more developing countries are developing national surgical plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66099597 Registered: 07/01/2014 BioMed Central 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6647149/ /pubmed/31331348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gajewski, Jakub Cheelo, Mweene Bijlmakers, Leon Kachimba, John Pittalis, Chiara Brugha, Ruairi The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
title | The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural zambia—a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gajewskijakub thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cheelomweene thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bijlmakersleon thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kachimbajohn thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pittalischiara thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brugharuairi thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gajewskijakub contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cheelomweene contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bijlmakersleon contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kachimbajohn contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pittalischiara contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brugharuairi contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial |