Cargando…

The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gajewski, Jakub, Cheelo, Mweene, Bijlmakers, Leon, Kachimba, John, Pittalis, Chiara, Brugha, Ruairi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9
_version_ 1783437666700754944
author Gajewski, Jakub
Cheelo, Mweene
Bijlmakers, Leon
Kachimba, John
Pittalis, Chiara
Brugha, Ruairi
author_facet Gajewski, Jakub
Cheelo, Mweene
Bijlmakers, Leon
Kachimba, John
Pittalis, Chiara
Brugha, Ruairi
author_sort Gajewski, Jakub
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess their contribution to the delivery of surgical care in rural hospitals in Zambia. METHODS: Sixteen hospitals were randomly assigned to intervention and control arms of the study. Nine MLs were deployed to eight intervention sites. Crude numbers of selected major surgical procedures between intervention and control sites were compared before and after the intervention. Volume and outcomes of surgery were compared within intervention hospitals, between NPCs and surgically active medical doctors (MDs). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the numbers of caesarean sections (CS) in the intervention hospitals (+ 15.2%) and a drop by almost half in the control group (− 47%) (P = 0.015), between the two time periods. There were marginal shifts in the numbers of index procedures: a small drop in the intervention group (− 4.9%) and slight increase in the control arm (+ 4.8%) (P = 0.505). In all pairs, MLs had higher mean number of CS and other major surgical cases done in the intervention period compared with MDs. There was no significant difference in postoperative wound infection rates for CS (P = 0.884) and other major surgical cases (P = 0.33) at intervention hospitals between MLs and MDs. CONCLUSION: This study provided evidence that the ML training programme in Zambia is an effective and safe way to bridge the gap in rural hospitals between the demand and the limited availability of surgically trained workforce in the country. Such evidence is greatly needed as more developing countries are developing national surgical plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66099597 Registered: 07/01/2014
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66471492019-07-31 The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial Gajewski, Jakub Cheelo, Mweene Bijlmakers, Leon Kachimba, John Pittalis, Chiara Brugha, Ruairi Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess their contribution to the delivery of surgical care in rural hospitals in Zambia. METHODS: Sixteen hospitals were randomly assigned to intervention and control arms of the study. Nine MLs were deployed to eight intervention sites. Crude numbers of selected major surgical procedures between intervention and control sites were compared before and after the intervention. Volume and outcomes of surgery were compared within intervention hospitals, between NPCs and surgically active medical doctors (MDs). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the numbers of caesarean sections (CS) in the intervention hospitals (+ 15.2%) and a drop by almost half in the control group (− 47%) (P = 0.015), between the two time periods. There were marginal shifts in the numbers of index procedures: a small drop in the intervention group (− 4.9%) and slight increase in the control arm (+ 4.8%) (P = 0.505). In all pairs, MLs had higher mean number of CS and other major surgical cases done in the intervention period compared with MDs. There was no significant difference in postoperative wound infection rates for CS (P = 0.884) and other major surgical cases (P = 0.33) at intervention hospitals between MLs and MDs. CONCLUSION: This study provided evidence that the ML training programme in Zambia is an effective and safe way to bridge the gap in rural hospitals between the demand and the limited availability of surgically trained workforce in the country. Such evidence is greatly needed as more developing countries are developing national surgical plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66099597 Registered: 07/01/2014 BioMed Central 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6647149/ /pubmed/31331348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gajewski, Jakub
Cheelo, Mweene
Bijlmakers, Leon
Kachimba, John
Pittalis, Chiara
Brugha, Ruairi
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
title The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
title_full The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
title_short The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
title_sort contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural zambia—a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gajewskijakub thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cheelomweene thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bijlmakersleon thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kachimbajohn thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pittalischiara thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brugharuairi thecontributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gajewskijakub contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cheelomweene contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bijlmakersleon contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kachimbajohn contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pittalischiara contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brugharuairi contributionofnonphysicianclinicianstotheprovisionofsurgeryinruralzambiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial