Cargando…

Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. METHODS: The searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MK, MS) to find the relevant studies published from 1/1/2009 until e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kave, Mania, Parooie, Fateme, Salarzaei, Morteza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0254-1
_version_ 1783437670974750720
author Kave, Mania
Parooie, Fateme
Salarzaei, Morteza
author_facet Kave, Mania
Parooie, Fateme
Salarzaei, Morteza
author_sort Kave, Mania
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. METHODS: The searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MK, MS) to find the relevant studies published from 1/1/2009 until end of 30/12/2018. We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASETM via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS. The keywords used in the search strategy are Pregnancy [MeSH], Pregnant [MeSH] OR—Magnetic resonance imaging [MeSH] OR—Appendicitis [MeSH] OR—Ultrasound, [MeSH] OR, imaging, MRI [MeSH] OR"،" and Right lower quadrant pain [MeSH]. The risk of bias of every article was evaluated by using QUADAS-2. On the basis of the results from the 2 × 2 tables, pooled measures for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curves (AUC) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the DerSimonian Lair methodology. RESULTS: As many as 1164 studies were selected. After analyzing the correspondence of the studies with the required criteria, 19 studies were selected for the final review. For appendicitis in pregnancy, the MRI sensitivity was 91.8% at the 95% confidence interval of (95% CI 87.7–94.9%). At the confidence interval of 95%, the specificity was 97.9% (95% CI 0.97.2–100%). The risk of bias in the studies conducted was measured using the QUADAS-2 tool. CONCLUSION: MRI has high sensitivity and specificity (91.8%, 97.9% respectively) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant patients with clinically suspected appendicitis. It is an excellent imaging technique in many instances, which does not expose a fetus, or the mother, to ionizing radiation, making it an excellent option for pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66471672019-07-31 Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women Kave, Mania Parooie, Fateme Salarzaei, Morteza World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. METHODS: The searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MK, MS) to find the relevant studies published from 1/1/2009 until end of 30/12/2018. We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASETM via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS. The keywords used in the search strategy are Pregnancy [MeSH], Pregnant [MeSH] OR—Magnetic resonance imaging [MeSH] OR—Appendicitis [MeSH] OR—Ultrasound, [MeSH] OR, imaging, MRI [MeSH] OR"،" and Right lower quadrant pain [MeSH]. The risk of bias of every article was evaluated by using QUADAS-2. On the basis of the results from the 2 × 2 tables, pooled measures for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curves (AUC) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the DerSimonian Lair methodology. RESULTS: As many as 1164 studies were selected. After analyzing the correspondence of the studies with the required criteria, 19 studies were selected for the final review. For appendicitis in pregnancy, the MRI sensitivity was 91.8% at the 95% confidence interval of (95% CI 87.7–94.9%). At the confidence interval of 95%, the specificity was 97.9% (95% CI 0.97.2–100%). The risk of bias in the studies conducted was measured using the QUADAS-2 tool. CONCLUSION: MRI has high sensitivity and specificity (91.8%, 97.9% respectively) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant patients with clinically suspected appendicitis. It is an excellent imaging technique in many instances, which does not expose a fetus, or the mother, to ionizing radiation, making it an excellent option for pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis. BioMed Central 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6647167/ /pubmed/31367227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0254-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kave, Mania
Parooie, Fateme
Salarzaei, Morteza
Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
title Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
title_full Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
title_fullStr Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
title_short Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
title_sort pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of mri in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0254-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kavemania pregnancyandappendicitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheclinicaluseofmriindiagnosisofappendicitisinpregnantwomen
AT parooiefateme pregnancyandappendicitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheclinicaluseofmriindiagnosisofappendicitisinpregnantwomen
AT salarzaeimorteza pregnancyandappendicitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheclinicaluseofmriindiagnosisofappendicitisinpregnantwomen