Cargando…
Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET
PURPOSE: Currently, the most commonly used chelator for labelling antibodies with (89)Zr for immunoPET is desferrioxamine B (DFO). However, preclinical studies have shown that the limited in vivo stability of the (89)Zr-DFO complex results in release of (89)Zr, which accumulates in mineral bone. Her...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04343-2 |
_version_ | 1783437686035447808 |
---|---|
author | Raavé, René Sandker, Gerwin Adumeau, Pierre Jacobsen, Christian Borch Mangin, Floriane Meyer, Michel Moreau, Mathieu Bernhard, Claire Da Costa, Laurène Dubois, Adrien Goncalves, Victor Gustafsson, Magnus Rijpkema, Mark Boerman, Otto Chambron, Jean-Claude Heskamp, Sandra Denat, Franck |
author_facet | Raavé, René Sandker, Gerwin Adumeau, Pierre Jacobsen, Christian Borch Mangin, Floriane Meyer, Michel Moreau, Mathieu Bernhard, Claire Da Costa, Laurène Dubois, Adrien Goncalves, Victor Gustafsson, Magnus Rijpkema, Mark Boerman, Otto Chambron, Jean-Claude Heskamp, Sandra Denat, Franck |
author_sort | Raavé, René |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Currently, the most commonly used chelator for labelling antibodies with (89)Zr for immunoPET is desferrioxamine B (DFO). However, preclinical studies have shown that the limited in vivo stability of the (89)Zr-DFO complex results in release of (89)Zr, which accumulates in mineral bone. Here we report a novel chelator DFOcyclo*, a preorganized extended DFO derivative that enables octacoordination of the (89)Zr radiometal. The aim was to compare the in vitro and in vivo stability of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFOcyclo*, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO* and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO. METHODS: The stability of (89)Zr-labelled chelators alone and after conjugation to trastuzumab was evaluated in human plasma and PBS, and in the presence of excess EDTA or DFO. The immunoreactive fraction, IC(50), and internalization rate of the conjugates were evaluated using HER2-expressing SKOV-3 cells. The in vivo distribution was investigated in mice with subcutaneous HER2(+) SKOV-3 or HER2(−) MDA-MB-231 xenografts by PET/CT imaging and quantitative ex vivo tissue analyses 7 days after injection. RESULTS: (89)Zr-labelled DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* were stable in human plasma for up to 7 days. In competition with EDTA, DFO* and DFOcyclo* showed higher stability than DFO. In competition with excess DFO, DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab was significantly more stable than the corresponding DFO and DFO* conjugates (p < 0.001). Cell binding and internalization were similar for the three conjugates. In in vivo studies, HER2(+) SKOV-3 tumour-bearing mice showed significantly lower bone uptake (p < 0.001) 168 h after injection with [(89)Zr]Zr-DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab (femur 1.5 ± 0.3%ID/g, knee 2.1 ± 0.4%ID/g) or [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab (femur 2.0 ± 0.3%ID/g, knee 2.68 ± 0.4%ID/g) than after injection with [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (femur 4.5 ± 0.6%ID/g, knee 7.8 ± 0.6%ID/g). Blood levels, tumour uptake and uptake in other organs were not significantly different at 168 h after injection. HER2(−) MDA-MB-231 tumour-bearing mice showed significantly lower tumour uptake (p < 0.001) after injection with [(89)Zr]Zr-DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab (16.2 ± 10.1%ID/g) and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (19.6 ± 3.2%ID/g) than HER2(+) SKOV-3 tumour-bearing mice (72.1 ± 14.6%ID/g and 93.1 ± 20.9%ID/g, respectively), while bone uptake was similar. CONCLUSION: (89)Zr-labelled DFOcyclo* and DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab showed higher in vitro and in vivo stability than the current commonly used (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. DFOcyclo* is a promising candidate to become the new clinically used standard chelator for (89)Zr immunoPET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66472322019-08-06 Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET Raavé, René Sandker, Gerwin Adumeau, Pierre Jacobsen, Christian Borch Mangin, Floriane Meyer, Michel Moreau, Mathieu Bernhard, Claire Da Costa, Laurène Dubois, Adrien Goncalves, Victor Gustafsson, Magnus Rijpkema, Mark Boerman, Otto Chambron, Jean-Claude Heskamp, Sandra Denat, Franck Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Currently, the most commonly used chelator for labelling antibodies with (89)Zr for immunoPET is desferrioxamine B (DFO). However, preclinical studies have shown that the limited in vivo stability of the (89)Zr-DFO complex results in release of (89)Zr, which accumulates in mineral bone. Here we report a novel chelator DFOcyclo*, a preorganized extended DFO derivative that enables octacoordination of the (89)Zr radiometal. The aim was to compare the in vitro and in vivo stability of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFOcyclo*, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO* and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO. METHODS: The stability of (89)Zr-labelled chelators alone and after conjugation to trastuzumab was evaluated in human plasma and PBS, and in the presence of excess EDTA or DFO. The immunoreactive fraction, IC(50), and internalization rate of the conjugates were evaluated using HER2-expressing SKOV-3 cells. The in vivo distribution was investigated in mice with subcutaneous HER2(+) SKOV-3 or HER2(−) MDA-MB-231 xenografts by PET/CT imaging and quantitative ex vivo tissue analyses 7 days after injection. RESULTS: (89)Zr-labelled DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* were stable in human plasma for up to 7 days. In competition with EDTA, DFO* and DFOcyclo* showed higher stability than DFO. In competition with excess DFO, DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab was significantly more stable than the corresponding DFO and DFO* conjugates (p < 0.001). Cell binding and internalization were similar for the three conjugates. In in vivo studies, HER2(+) SKOV-3 tumour-bearing mice showed significantly lower bone uptake (p < 0.001) 168 h after injection with [(89)Zr]Zr-DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab (femur 1.5 ± 0.3%ID/g, knee 2.1 ± 0.4%ID/g) or [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab (femur 2.0 ± 0.3%ID/g, knee 2.68 ± 0.4%ID/g) than after injection with [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (femur 4.5 ± 0.6%ID/g, knee 7.8 ± 0.6%ID/g). Blood levels, tumour uptake and uptake in other organs were not significantly different at 168 h after injection. HER2(−) MDA-MB-231 tumour-bearing mice showed significantly lower tumour uptake (p < 0.001) after injection with [(89)Zr]Zr-DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab (16.2 ± 10.1%ID/g) and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (19.6 ± 3.2%ID/g) than HER2(+) SKOV-3 tumour-bearing mice (72.1 ± 14.6%ID/g and 93.1 ± 20.9%ID/g, respectively), while bone uptake was similar. CONCLUSION: (89)Zr-labelled DFOcyclo* and DFOcyclo*-trastuzumab showed higher in vitro and in vivo stability than the current commonly used (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. DFOcyclo* is a promising candidate to become the new clinically used standard chelator for (89)Zr immunoPET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647232/ /pubmed/31161258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04343-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Raavé, René Sandker, Gerwin Adumeau, Pierre Jacobsen, Christian Borch Mangin, Floriane Meyer, Michel Moreau, Mathieu Bernhard, Claire Da Costa, Laurène Dubois, Adrien Goncalves, Victor Gustafsson, Magnus Rijpkema, Mark Boerman, Otto Chambron, Jean-Claude Heskamp, Sandra Denat, Franck Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET |
title | Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET |
title_full | Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET |
title_fullStr | Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET |
title_short | Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET |
title_sort | direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of dfo, dfo* and dfocyclo* for (89)zr-immunopet |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04343-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raaverene directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT sandkergerwin directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT adumeaupierre directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT jacobsenchristianborch directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT manginfloriane directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT meyermichel directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT moreaumathieu directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT bernhardclaire directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT dacostalaurene directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT duboisadrien directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT goncalvesvictor directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT gustafssonmagnus directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT rijpkemamark directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT boermanotto directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT chambronjeanclaude directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT heskampsandra directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet AT denatfranck directcomparisonoftheinvitroandinvivostabilityofdfodfoanddfocyclofor89zrimmunopet |