Cargando…
Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
BACKGROUND: Hyposmia can develop with age and in neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a 40-item smell test widely used for assessing hyposmia. However, in a number of situations, such as identifying hypo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x |
_version_ | 1783437686976020480 |
---|---|
author | Joseph, Theresita Auger, Stephen D. Peress, Luisa Rack, Daniel Cuzick, Jack Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew Schrag, Anette E. Noyce, Alastair J. |
author_facet | Joseph, Theresita Auger, Stephen D. Peress, Luisa Rack, Daniel Cuzick, Jack Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew Schrag, Anette E. Noyce, Alastair J. |
author_sort | Joseph, Theresita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hyposmia can develop with age and in neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a 40-item smell test widely used for assessing hyposmia. However, in a number of situations, such as identifying hyposmic individuals in large populations, shorter tests are preferable. METHODS: We assessed the ability of shorter UPSIT subsets to detect hyposmia in 891 healthy participants from the PREDICT-PD study. Shorter subsets included Versions A and B of the 4-item Pocket Smell Test (PST) and 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT). Using a data-driven approach, we evaluated screening performances of 23,231,378 combinations of 1–7 smell items from the full UPSIT to derive “winning” subsets, and validated findings separately in another 191 healthy individuals. We then compared discriminatory UPSIT smells between PREDICT-PD participants and 40 PD patients, and assessed the performance of “winning” subsets containing discriminatory smells in PD patients. RESULTS: PST Versions A and B achieved sensitivity/specificity of 76.8%/64.9% and 86.6%/45.9%, respectively, while BSIT Versions A and B achieved 83.1%/79.5% and 96.5%/51.8%. From the data-driven analysis, 2 “winning” 7-item subsets surpassed the screening performance of 12-item BSITs (validation sensitivity/specificity of 88.2%/85.4% and 100%/53.5%), while a “winning” 4-item subset had higher sensitivity than PST-A, -B, and even BSIT-A (validation sensitivity 91.2%). Interestingly, several discriminatory smells featured within “winning” subsets, and demonstrated high-screening performances for identifying hyposmic PD patients. CONCLUSION: Using abbreviated smell tests could provide a cost-effective means of large-scale hyposmia screening, allowing more targeted UPSIT administration in general and PD-related settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66472362019-08-06 Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test Joseph, Theresita Auger, Stephen D. Peress, Luisa Rack, Daniel Cuzick, Jack Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew Schrag, Anette E. Noyce, Alastair J. J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Hyposmia can develop with age and in neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a 40-item smell test widely used for assessing hyposmia. However, in a number of situations, such as identifying hyposmic individuals in large populations, shorter tests are preferable. METHODS: We assessed the ability of shorter UPSIT subsets to detect hyposmia in 891 healthy participants from the PREDICT-PD study. Shorter subsets included Versions A and B of the 4-item Pocket Smell Test (PST) and 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT). Using a data-driven approach, we evaluated screening performances of 23,231,378 combinations of 1–7 smell items from the full UPSIT to derive “winning” subsets, and validated findings separately in another 191 healthy individuals. We then compared discriminatory UPSIT smells between PREDICT-PD participants and 40 PD patients, and assessed the performance of “winning” subsets containing discriminatory smells in PD patients. RESULTS: PST Versions A and B achieved sensitivity/specificity of 76.8%/64.9% and 86.6%/45.9%, respectively, while BSIT Versions A and B achieved 83.1%/79.5% and 96.5%/51.8%. From the data-driven analysis, 2 “winning” 7-item subsets surpassed the screening performance of 12-item BSITs (validation sensitivity/specificity of 88.2%/85.4% and 100%/53.5%), while a “winning” 4-item subset had higher sensitivity than PST-A, -B, and even BSIT-A (validation sensitivity 91.2%). Interestingly, several discriminatory smells featured within “winning” subsets, and demonstrated high-screening performances for identifying hyposmic PD patients. CONCLUSION: Using abbreviated smell tests could provide a cost-effective means of large-scale hyposmia screening, allowing more targeted UPSIT administration in general and PD-related settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647236/ /pubmed/31053960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Communication Joseph, Theresita Auger, Stephen D. Peress, Luisa Rack, Daniel Cuzick, Jack Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew Schrag, Anette E. Noyce, Alastair J. Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test |
title | Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test |
title_full | Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test |
title_fullStr | Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test |
title_short | Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test |
title_sort | screening performance of abbreviated versions of the upsit smell test |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josephtheresita screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT augerstephend screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT peressluisa screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT rackdaniel screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT cuzickjack screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT giovannonigavin screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT leesandrew screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT schraganettee screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest AT noycealastairj screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest |