Cargando…

Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test

BACKGROUND: Hyposmia can develop with age and in neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a 40-item smell test widely used for assessing hyposmia. However, in a number of situations, such as identifying hypo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Theresita, Auger, Stephen D., Peress, Luisa, Rack, Daniel, Cuzick, Jack, Giovannoni, Gavin, Lees, Andrew, Schrag, Anette E., Noyce, Alastair J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x
_version_ 1783437686976020480
author Joseph, Theresita
Auger, Stephen D.
Peress, Luisa
Rack, Daniel
Cuzick, Jack
Giovannoni, Gavin
Lees, Andrew
Schrag, Anette E.
Noyce, Alastair J.
author_facet Joseph, Theresita
Auger, Stephen D.
Peress, Luisa
Rack, Daniel
Cuzick, Jack
Giovannoni, Gavin
Lees, Andrew
Schrag, Anette E.
Noyce, Alastair J.
author_sort Joseph, Theresita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hyposmia can develop with age and in neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a 40-item smell test widely used for assessing hyposmia. However, in a number of situations, such as identifying hyposmic individuals in large populations, shorter tests are preferable. METHODS: We assessed the ability of shorter UPSIT subsets to detect hyposmia in 891 healthy participants from the PREDICT-PD study. Shorter subsets included Versions A and B of the 4-item Pocket Smell Test (PST) and 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT). Using a data-driven approach, we evaluated screening performances of 23,231,378 combinations of 1–7 smell items from the full UPSIT to derive “winning” subsets, and validated findings separately in another 191 healthy individuals. We then compared discriminatory UPSIT smells between PREDICT-PD participants and 40 PD patients, and assessed the performance of “winning” subsets containing discriminatory smells in PD patients. RESULTS: PST Versions A and B achieved sensitivity/specificity of 76.8%/64.9% and 86.6%/45.9%, respectively, while BSIT Versions A and B achieved 83.1%/79.5% and 96.5%/51.8%. From the data-driven analysis, 2 “winning” 7-item subsets surpassed the screening performance of 12-item BSITs (validation sensitivity/specificity of 88.2%/85.4% and 100%/53.5%), while a “winning” 4-item subset had higher sensitivity than PST-A, -B, and even BSIT-A (validation sensitivity 91.2%). Interestingly, several discriminatory smells featured within “winning” subsets, and demonstrated high-screening performances for identifying hyposmic PD patients. CONCLUSION: Using abbreviated smell tests could provide a cost-effective means of large-scale hyposmia screening, allowing more targeted UPSIT administration in general and PD-related settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66472362019-08-06 Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test Joseph, Theresita Auger, Stephen D. Peress, Luisa Rack, Daniel Cuzick, Jack Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew Schrag, Anette E. Noyce, Alastair J. J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Hyposmia can develop with age and in neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a 40-item smell test widely used for assessing hyposmia. However, in a number of situations, such as identifying hyposmic individuals in large populations, shorter tests are preferable. METHODS: We assessed the ability of shorter UPSIT subsets to detect hyposmia in 891 healthy participants from the PREDICT-PD study. Shorter subsets included Versions A and B of the 4-item Pocket Smell Test (PST) and 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT). Using a data-driven approach, we evaluated screening performances of 23,231,378 combinations of 1–7 smell items from the full UPSIT to derive “winning” subsets, and validated findings separately in another 191 healthy individuals. We then compared discriminatory UPSIT smells between PREDICT-PD participants and 40 PD patients, and assessed the performance of “winning” subsets containing discriminatory smells in PD patients. RESULTS: PST Versions A and B achieved sensitivity/specificity of 76.8%/64.9% and 86.6%/45.9%, respectively, while BSIT Versions A and B achieved 83.1%/79.5% and 96.5%/51.8%. From the data-driven analysis, 2 “winning” 7-item subsets surpassed the screening performance of 12-item BSITs (validation sensitivity/specificity of 88.2%/85.4% and 100%/53.5%), while a “winning” 4-item subset had higher sensitivity than PST-A, -B, and even BSIT-A (validation sensitivity 91.2%). Interestingly, several discriminatory smells featured within “winning” subsets, and demonstrated high-screening performances for identifying hyposmic PD patients. CONCLUSION: Using abbreviated smell tests could provide a cost-effective means of large-scale hyposmia screening, allowing more targeted UPSIT administration in general and PD-related settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647236/ /pubmed/31053960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Joseph, Theresita
Auger, Stephen D.
Peress, Luisa
Rack, Daniel
Cuzick, Jack
Giovannoni, Gavin
Lees, Andrew
Schrag, Anette E.
Noyce, Alastair J.
Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
title Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
title_full Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
title_fullStr Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
title_full_unstemmed Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
title_short Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
title_sort screening performance of abbreviated versions of the upsit smell test
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x
work_keys_str_mv AT josephtheresita screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT augerstephend screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT peressluisa screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT rackdaniel screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT cuzickjack screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT giovannonigavin screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT leesandrew screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT schraganettee screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest
AT noycealastairj screeningperformanceofabbreviatedversionsoftheupsitsmelltest