Cargando…

Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search

AIM: The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools developed and used to assess orthorexia nervosa (ON). METHODS: A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Biomed Central, and PsycINFO. The final list included 70 articles that were critically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of six tools w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valente, Martina, Syurina, Elena V., Donini, Lorenzo Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00735-3
_version_ 1783437726012407808
author Valente, Martina
Syurina, Elena V.
Donini, Lorenzo Maria
author_facet Valente, Martina
Syurina, Elena V.
Donini, Lorenzo Maria
author_sort Valente, Martina
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools developed and used to assess orthorexia nervosa (ON). METHODS: A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Biomed Central, and PsycINFO. The final list included 70 articles that were critically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of six tools were reported to assess ON: the BOT, the ORTO-15, the EHQ, the DOS, the BOS, and the TOS. The tools were based upon different conceptualizations of ON and of its diagnostic criteria. Although they were different, all the conceptualizations derived from the initial definition of ON provided by Bratman in 1997. None of the methodologies adopted for tool construction considered end users or client perspectives and, when carried out, the validations of the tools were fragmented and often based on specific populations. CONCLUSION: This study may be a starting point for the construction of a new diagnostic tool for ON. Starting from the methodological weaknesses identified by this review, it was possible to derive some suggestions for future research: (a) developing a modern re-conceptualization of ON, comprehensive of end-user perspectives; (b) adopting qualitative data collection techniques to gain insights into how to diagnose ON; and (c) actively involving diverse stakeholders for constructing a new tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of Evidence: I, systematic review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66474442019-08-06 Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search Valente, Martina Syurina, Elena V. Donini, Lorenzo Maria Eat Weight Disord Review AIM: The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools developed and used to assess orthorexia nervosa (ON). METHODS: A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Biomed Central, and PsycINFO. The final list included 70 articles that were critically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of six tools were reported to assess ON: the BOT, the ORTO-15, the EHQ, the DOS, the BOS, and the TOS. The tools were based upon different conceptualizations of ON and of its diagnostic criteria. Although they were different, all the conceptualizations derived from the initial definition of ON provided by Bratman in 1997. None of the methodologies adopted for tool construction considered end users or client perspectives and, when carried out, the validations of the tools were fragmented and often based on specific populations. CONCLUSION: This study may be a starting point for the construction of a new diagnostic tool for ON. Starting from the methodological weaknesses identified by this review, it was possible to derive some suggestions for future research: (a) developing a modern re-conceptualization of ON, comprehensive of end-user perspectives; (b) adopting qualitative data collection techniques to gain insights into how to diagnose ON; and (c) actively involving diverse stakeholders for constructing a new tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of Evidence: I, systematic review. Springer International Publishing 2019-06-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647444/ /pubmed/31228168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00735-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Valente, Martina
Syurina, Elena V.
Donini, Lorenzo Maria
Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
title Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
title_full Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
title_fullStr Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
title_full_unstemmed Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
title_short Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
title_sort shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00735-3
work_keys_str_mv AT valentemartina sheddinglightuponvarioustoolstoassessorthorexianervosaacriticalliteraturereviewwithasystematicsearch
AT syurinaelenav sheddinglightuponvarioustoolstoassessorthorexianervosaacriticalliteraturereviewwithasystematicsearch
AT doninilorenzomaria sheddinglightuponvarioustoolstoassessorthorexianervosaacriticalliteraturereviewwithasystematicsearch