Cargando…
A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
This paper considers how to identify statistical outliers in psychophysical datasets where the underlying sampling distributions are unknown. Eight methods are described, and each is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a typical psychophysical experiment. The best method is shown to be one ba...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01726-3 |
_version_ | 1783437728346537984 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Pete R. |
author_facet | Jones, Pete R. |
author_sort | Jones, Pete R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper considers how to identify statistical outliers in psychophysical datasets where the underlying sampling distributions are unknown. Eight methods are described, and each is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a typical psychophysical experiment. The best method is shown to be one based on a measure of spread known as S(n). This is shown to be more sensitive than popular heuristics based on standard deviations from the mean, and more robust than non-parametric methods based on percentiles or interquartile range. Matlab code for computing S(n) is included. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66474542019-08-06 A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data Jones, Pete R. Atten Percept Psychophys Tutorial Review This paper considers how to identify statistical outliers in psychophysical datasets where the underlying sampling distributions are unknown. Eight methods are described, and each is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a typical psychophysical experiment. The best method is shown to be one based on a measure of spread known as S(n). This is shown to be more sensitive than popular heuristics based on standard deviations from the mean, and more robust than non-parametric methods based on percentiles or interquartile range. Matlab code for computing S(n) is included. Springer US 2019-05-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647454/ /pubmed/31089976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01726-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Tutorial Review Jones, Pete R. A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
title | A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
title_full | A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
title_fullStr | A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
title_full_unstemmed | A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
title_short | A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
title_sort | note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data |
topic | Tutorial Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01726-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonespeter anoteondetectingstatisticaloutliersinpsychophysicaldata AT jonespeter noteondetectingstatisticaloutliersinpsychophysicaldata |