Cargando…

A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data

This paper considers how to identify statistical outliers in psychophysical datasets where the underlying sampling distributions are unknown. Eight methods are described, and each is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a typical psychophysical experiment. The best method is shown to be one ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jones, Pete R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01726-3
_version_ 1783437728346537984
author Jones, Pete R.
author_facet Jones, Pete R.
author_sort Jones, Pete R.
collection PubMed
description This paper considers how to identify statistical outliers in psychophysical datasets where the underlying sampling distributions are unknown. Eight methods are described, and each is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a typical psychophysical experiment. The best method is shown to be one based on a measure of spread known as S(n). This is shown to be more sensitive than popular heuristics based on standard deviations from the mean, and more robust than non-parametric methods based on percentiles or interquartile range. Matlab code for computing S(n) is included.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66474542019-08-06 A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data Jones, Pete R. Atten Percept Psychophys Tutorial Review This paper considers how to identify statistical outliers in psychophysical datasets where the underlying sampling distributions are unknown. Eight methods are described, and each is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a typical psychophysical experiment. The best method is shown to be one based on a measure of spread known as S(n). This is shown to be more sensitive than popular heuristics based on standard deviations from the mean, and more robust than non-parametric methods based on percentiles or interquartile range. Matlab code for computing S(n) is included. Springer US 2019-05-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647454/ /pubmed/31089976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01726-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Tutorial Review
Jones, Pete R.
A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
title A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
title_full A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
title_fullStr A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
title_full_unstemmed A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
title_short A note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
title_sort note on detecting statistical outliers in psychophysical data
topic Tutorial Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01726-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jonespeter anoteondetectingstatisticaloutliersinpsychophysicaldata
AT jonespeter noteondetectingstatisticaloutliersinpsychophysicaldata