Cargando…

Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND: Orogastric tubes have traditionally aided foregut procedures with sizing and organ protection. The rise of bariatric surgery has led to the creation of novel medical devices aimed at facilitating the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. While approved by the FDA, the long-term safety profile...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nandra, Kulvir, Ing, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6269-y
_version_ 1783437729011335168
author Nandra, Kulvir
Ing, Richard
author_facet Nandra, Kulvir
Ing, Richard
author_sort Nandra, Kulvir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orogastric tubes have traditionally aided foregut procedures with sizing and organ protection. The rise of bariatric surgery has led to the creation of novel medical devices aimed at facilitating the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. While approved by the FDA, the long-term safety profile of these devices in the general population is often unknown. This review looks at complications associated with novel Orogastric Tubes compared to the traditional bougie. METHODS: We performed a review of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for complications associated with the traditional bougie, Boehringer Labs ViSiGi 3D® and the Medtronic GastriSail™ since 2011. In addition, we looked for reported cases in the literature of complications with these devices. RESULTS: Overall complication rates reported in the MAUDE database varied in number and severity. The bougie had seven reported complications, one of which was an organ perforation. The ViSiGi 3D® had zero reported complications. The GastriSail™ had 36 total reported complications with 17 perforations. A literature review shows that rates of bougie complications are extremely rare with no case reports or reviews of complications from the novel orogastric tubes. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rates between the traditional bougie and novel devices vary in number and severity, with the GastriSail™ having the highest reported complication rate. Despite rigorous testing for FDA approval, ongoing research into performance of new medical devices in the general population remains important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66474582019-08-06 Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery Nandra, Kulvir Ing, Richard Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: Orogastric tubes have traditionally aided foregut procedures with sizing and organ protection. The rise of bariatric surgery has led to the creation of novel medical devices aimed at facilitating the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. While approved by the FDA, the long-term safety profile of these devices in the general population is often unknown. This review looks at complications associated with novel Orogastric Tubes compared to the traditional bougie. METHODS: We performed a review of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for complications associated with the traditional bougie, Boehringer Labs ViSiGi 3D® and the Medtronic GastriSail™ since 2011. In addition, we looked for reported cases in the literature of complications with these devices. RESULTS: Overall complication rates reported in the MAUDE database varied in number and severity. The bougie had seven reported complications, one of which was an organ perforation. The ViSiGi 3D® had zero reported complications. The GastriSail™ had 36 total reported complications with 17 perforations. A literature review shows that rates of bougie complications are extremely rare with no case reports or reviews of complications from the novel orogastric tubes. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rates between the traditional bougie and novel devices vary in number and severity, with the GastriSail™ having the highest reported complication rate. Despite rigorous testing for FDA approval, ongoing research into performance of new medical devices in the general population remains important. Springer US 2018-06-19 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6647458/ /pubmed/29922850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6269-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Nandra, Kulvir
Ing, Richard
Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
title Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
title_full Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
title_fullStr Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
title_full_unstemmed Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
title_short Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
title_sort safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6269-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nandrakulvir safetyoforogastrictubesinforegutandbariatricsurgery
AT ingrichard safetyoforogastrictubesinforegutandbariatricsurgery