Cargando…

Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial

The aim of this study was to examine the extent of recanting (inconsistencies in reporting of lifetime alcohol use) and its impact on the assessment of primary outcomes within a large-scale alcohol prevention trial. One hundred and five post-primary schools in were randomised to receive either the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Percy, Andrew, Agus, Ashley, Cole, Jon, Doherty, Paul, Foxcroft, David, Harvey, Séamus, McKay, Michael, Murphy, Lynn, Sumnall, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0981-2
_version_ 1783437734228000768
author Percy, Andrew
Agus, Ashley
Cole, Jon
Doherty, Paul
Foxcroft, David
Harvey, Séamus
McKay, Michael
Murphy, Lynn
Sumnall, Harry
author_facet Percy, Andrew
Agus, Ashley
Cole, Jon
Doherty, Paul
Foxcroft, David
Harvey, Séamus
McKay, Michael
Murphy, Lynn
Sumnall, Harry
author_sort Percy, Andrew
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to examine the extent of recanting (inconsistencies in reporting of lifetime alcohol use) and its impact on the assessment of primary outcomes within a large-scale alcohol prevention trial. One hundred and five post-primary schools in were randomised to receive either the intervention or education as normal. Participants (N = 12,738) were secondary school students in year 8/S1 (mean age 12.5) at baseline. Self-report questionnaires were administered at baseline (T0) and at T1 (+ 12 months post-baseline), T2 (+ 24 months) and T3 (+ 33 months). The primary outcomes were (i) heavy episodic drinking (consumption of ≥ 6 units in a single episode in the previous 30 days for males and ≥ 4.5 units for females) assessed at T3 and (ii) the number of alcohol-related harms experienced in the last 6 months assessed at T3. Recanting was defined as a negative report of lifetime alcohol consumption that contradicted a prior positive report. Between T1 and T3, 9.9% of students recanted earlier alcohol consumption. Recanting ranged from 4.5 to 5.3% across individual data sweeps. While recanting was significantly associated (negatively) with both primary outcomes, the difference in the rate of recanting across trial arms was small, and adjusting for recanting within the primary outcome models did not impact on the primary outcome effects. Males were observed to recant at a greater rate than females, with a borderline small-sized effect (V = .09). While differential rates of recanting have the potential to undermine the analysis of prevention trial outcomes, recanting is easy to identify and control for within trial primary outcome analyses. Adjusting for recanting should be considered as an additional sensitivity test within prevention trials. Trial Registration: ISRCTN47028486 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN47028486). The date of trial registration was 23/09/2011, and school recruitment began 01/11/2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66474832019-08-06 Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial Percy, Andrew Agus, Ashley Cole, Jon Doherty, Paul Foxcroft, David Harvey, Séamus McKay, Michael Murphy, Lynn Sumnall, Harry Prev Sci Article The aim of this study was to examine the extent of recanting (inconsistencies in reporting of lifetime alcohol use) and its impact on the assessment of primary outcomes within a large-scale alcohol prevention trial. One hundred and five post-primary schools in were randomised to receive either the intervention or education as normal. Participants (N = 12,738) were secondary school students in year 8/S1 (mean age 12.5) at baseline. Self-report questionnaires were administered at baseline (T0) and at T1 (+ 12 months post-baseline), T2 (+ 24 months) and T3 (+ 33 months). The primary outcomes were (i) heavy episodic drinking (consumption of ≥ 6 units in a single episode in the previous 30 days for males and ≥ 4.5 units for females) assessed at T3 and (ii) the number of alcohol-related harms experienced in the last 6 months assessed at T3. Recanting was defined as a negative report of lifetime alcohol consumption that contradicted a prior positive report. Between T1 and T3, 9.9% of students recanted earlier alcohol consumption. Recanting ranged from 4.5 to 5.3% across individual data sweeps. While recanting was significantly associated (negatively) with both primary outcomes, the difference in the rate of recanting across trial arms was small, and adjusting for recanting within the primary outcome models did not impact on the primary outcome effects. Males were observed to recant at a greater rate than females, with a borderline small-sized effect (V = .09). While differential rates of recanting have the potential to undermine the analysis of prevention trial outcomes, recanting is easy to identify and control for within trial primary outcome analyses. Adjusting for recanting should be considered as an additional sensitivity test within prevention trials. Trial Registration: ISRCTN47028486 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN47028486). The date of trial registration was 23/09/2011, and school recruitment began 01/11/2011. Springer US 2019-01-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647483/ /pubmed/30637672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0981-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Percy, Andrew
Agus, Ashley
Cole, Jon
Doherty, Paul
Foxcroft, David
Harvey, Séamus
McKay, Michael
Murphy, Lynn
Sumnall, Harry
Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
title Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
title_full Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
title_fullStr Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
title_full_unstemmed Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
title_short Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
title_sort recanting of previous reports of alcohol consumption within a large-scale clustered randomised control trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0981-2
work_keys_str_mv AT percyandrew recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT agusashley recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT colejon recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT dohertypaul recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT foxcroftdavid recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT harveyseamus recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT mckaymichael recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT murphylynn recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial
AT sumnallharry recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial