Cargando…
Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial
The aim of this study was to examine the extent of recanting (inconsistencies in reporting of lifetime alcohol use) and its impact on the assessment of primary outcomes within a large-scale alcohol prevention trial. One hundred and five post-primary schools in were randomised to receive either the i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0981-2 |
_version_ | 1783437734228000768 |
---|---|
author | Percy, Andrew Agus, Ashley Cole, Jon Doherty, Paul Foxcroft, David Harvey, Séamus McKay, Michael Murphy, Lynn Sumnall, Harry |
author_facet | Percy, Andrew Agus, Ashley Cole, Jon Doherty, Paul Foxcroft, David Harvey, Séamus McKay, Michael Murphy, Lynn Sumnall, Harry |
author_sort | Percy, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to examine the extent of recanting (inconsistencies in reporting of lifetime alcohol use) and its impact on the assessment of primary outcomes within a large-scale alcohol prevention trial. One hundred and five post-primary schools in were randomised to receive either the intervention or education as normal. Participants (N = 12,738) were secondary school students in year 8/S1 (mean age 12.5) at baseline. Self-report questionnaires were administered at baseline (T0) and at T1 (+ 12 months post-baseline), T2 (+ 24 months) and T3 (+ 33 months). The primary outcomes were (i) heavy episodic drinking (consumption of ≥ 6 units in a single episode in the previous 30 days for males and ≥ 4.5 units for females) assessed at T3 and (ii) the number of alcohol-related harms experienced in the last 6 months assessed at T3. Recanting was defined as a negative report of lifetime alcohol consumption that contradicted a prior positive report. Between T1 and T3, 9.9% of students recanted earlier alcohol consumption. Recanting ranged from 4.5 to 5.3% across individual data sweeps. While recanting was significantly associated (negatively) with both primary outcomes, the difference in the rate of recanting across trial arms was small, and adjusting for recanting within the primary outcome models did not impact on the primary outcome effects. Males were observed to recant at a greater rate than females, with a borderline small-sized effect (V = .09). While differential rates of recanting have the potential to undermine the analysis of prevention trial outcomes, recanting is easy to identify and control for within trial primary outcome analyses. Adjusting for recanting should be considered as an additional sensitivity test within prevention trials. Trial Registration: ISRCTN47028486 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN47028486). The date of trial registration was 23/09/2011, and school recruitment began 01/11/2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66474832019-08-06 Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial Percy, Andrew Agus, Ashley Cole, Jon Doherty, Paul Foxcroft, David Harvey, Séamus McKay, Michael Murphy, Lynn Sumnall, Harry Prev Sci Article The aim of this study was to examine the extent of recanting (inconsistencies in reporting of lifetime alcohol use) and its impact on the assessment of primary outcomes within a large-scale alcohol prevention trial. One hundred and five post-primary schools in were randomised to receive either the intervention or education as normal. Participants (N = 12,738) were secondary school students in year 8/S1 (mean age 12.5) at baseline. Self-report questionnaires were administered at baseline (T0) and at T1 (+ 12 months post-baseline), T2 (+ 24 months) and T3 (+ 33 months). The primary outcomes were (i) heavy episodic drinking (consumption of ≥ 6 units in a single episode in the previous 30 days for males and ≥ 4.5 units for females) assessed at T3 and (ii) the number of alcohol-related harms experienced in the last 6 months assessed at T3. Recanting was defined as a negative report of lifetime alcohol consumption that contradicted a prior positive report. Between T1 and T3, 9.9% of students recanted earlier alcohol consumption. Recanting ranged from 4.5 to 5.3% across individual data sweeps. While recanting was significantly associated (negatively) with both primary outcomes, the difference in the rate of recanting across trial arms was small, and adjusting for recanting within the primary outcome models did not impact on the primary outcome effects. Males were observed to recant at a greater rate than females, with a borderline small-sized effect (V = .09). While differential rates of recanting have the potential to undermine the analysis of prevention trial outcomes, recanting is easy to identify and control for within trial primary outcome analyses. Adjusting for recanting should be considered as an additional sensitivity test within prevention trials. Trial Registration: ISRCTN47028486 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN47028486). The date of trial registration was 23/09/2011, and school recruitment began 01/11/2011. Springer US 2019-01-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647483/ /pubmed/30637672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0981-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Percy, Andrew Agus, Ashley Cole, Jon Doherty, Paul Foxcroft, David Harvey, Séamus McKay, Michael Murphy, Lynn Sumnall, Harry Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial |
title | Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial |
title_full | Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial |
title_fullStr | Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial |
title_short | Recanting of Previous Reports of Alcohol Consumption within a Large-Scale Clustered Randomised Control Trial |
title_sort | recanting of previous reports of alcohol consumption within a large-scale clustered randomised control trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0981-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT percyandrew recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT agusashley recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT colejon recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT dohertypaul recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT foxcroftdavid recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT harveyseamus recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT mckaymichael recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT murphylynn recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial AT sumnallharry recantingofpreviousreportsofalcoholconsumptionwithinalargescaleclusteredrandomisedcontroltrial |