Cargando…
The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum’s inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01029-1 |
_version_ | 1783437737309765632 |
---|---|
author | Jongkees, Bryant J. Immink, Maarten A. Boer, Olga D. Yavari, Fatemeh Nitsche, Michael A. Colzato, Lorenza S. |
author_facet | Jongkees, Bryant J. Immink, Maarten A. Boer, Olga D. Yavari, Fatemeh Nitsche, Michael A. Colzato, Lorenza S. |
author_sort | Jongkees, Bryant J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum’s inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in fine motor control and motor coordination, we investigated whether cerebellar tDCS can modulate response selection processes and motor sequence learning. Seventy-two participants received either cerebellar anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (placebo) tDCS while performing a serial reaction time task (SRTT). To compare acute and long-term effects of stimulation on behavioral performance, participants came back for follow-up testing at 24 h after stimulation. Results indicated no group differences in performance prior to tDCS. During stimulation, tDCS did not affect sequence-specific learning, but anodal as compared to cathodal and sham stimulations did modulate response selection processes. Specifically, anodal tDCS increased response latencies independent of whether a trained or transfer sequence was being performed, although this effect became smaller throughout training. At the 24-h follow-up, the group that previously received anodal tDCS again demonstrated increased response latencies, but only when the previously trained sequence and a transfer sequence had to be performed in the same experimental block. This increased behavioral interference tentatively points to a detrimental effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on sequence consolidation/retention. These results are consistent with the notion that the cerebellum exerts an inhibitory effect on cortical motor areas, which can impair sequential response selection when this inhibition is strengthened by tDCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66474972019-08-06 The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection Jongkees, Bryant J. Immink, Maarten A. Boer, Olga D. Yavari, Fatemeh Nitsche, Michael A. Colzato, Lorenza S. Cerebellum Original Paper Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum’s inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in fine motor control and motor coordination, we investigated whether cerebellar tDCS can modulate response selection processes and motor sequence learning. Seventy-two participants received either cerebellar anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (placebo) tDCS while performing a serial reaction time task (SRTT). To compare acute and long-term effects of stimulation on behavioral performance, participants came back for follow-up testing at 24 h after stimulation. Results indicated no group differences in performance prior to tDCS. During stimulation, tDCS did not affect sequence-specific learning, but anodal as compared to cathodal and sham stimulations did modulate response selection processes. Specifically, anodal tDCS increased response latencies independent of whether a trained or transfer sequence was being performed, although this effect became smaller throughout training. At the 24-h follow-up, the group that previously received anodal tDCS again demonstrated increased response latencies, but only when the previously trained sequence and a transfer sequence had to be performed in the same experimental block. This increased behavioral interference tentatively points to a detrimental effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on sequence consolidation/retention. These results are consistent with the notion that the cerebellum exerts an inhibitory effect on cortical motor areas, which can impair sequential response selection when this inhibition is strengthened by tDCS. Springer US 2019-05-06 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647497/ /pubmed/31062282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01029-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Jongkees, Bryant J. Immink, Maarten A. Boer, Olga D. Yavari, Fatemeh Nitsche, Michael A. Colzato, Lorenza S. The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection |
title | The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection |
title_full | The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection |
title_short | The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection |
title_sort | effect of cerebellar tdcs on sequential motor response selection |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01029-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jongkeesbryantj theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT imminkmaartena theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT boerolgad theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT yavarifatemeh theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT nitschemichaela theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT colzatolorenzas theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT jongkeesbryantj effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT imminkmaartena effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT boerolgad effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT yavarifatemeh effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT nitschemichaela effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection AT colzatolorenzas effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection |