Cargando…

The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum’s inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jongkees, Bryant J., Immink, Maarten A., Boer, Olga D., Yavari, Fatemeh, Nitsche, Michael A., Colzato, Lorenza S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01029-1
_version_ 1783437737309765632
author Jongkees, Bryant J.
Immink, Maarten A.
Boer, Olga D.
Yavari, Fatemeh
Nitsche, Michael A.
Colzato, Lorenza S.
author_facet Jongkees, Bryant J.
Immink, Maarten A.
Boer, Olga D.
Yavari, Fatemeh
Nitsche, Michael A.
Colzato, Lorenza S.
author_sort Jongkees, Bryant J.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum’s inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in fine motor control and motor coordination, we investigated whether cerebellar tDCS can modulate response selection processes and motor sequence learning. Seventy-two participants received either cerebellar anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (placebo) tDCS while performing a serial reaction time task (SRTT). To compare acute and long-term effects of stimulation on behavioral performance, participants came back for follow-up testing at 24 h after stimulation. Results indicated no group differences in performance prior to tDCS. During stimulation, tDCS did not affect sequence-specific learning, but anodal as compared to cathodal and sham stimulations did modulate response selection processes. Specifically, anodal tDCS increased response latencies independent of whether a trained or transfer sequence was being performed, although this effect became smaller throughout training. At the 24-h follow-up, the group that previously received anodal tDCS again demonstrated increased response latencies, but only when the previously trained sequence and a transfer sequence had to be performed in the same experimental block. This increased behavioral interference tentatively points to a detrimental effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on sequence consolidation/retention. These results are consistent with the notion that the cerebellum exerts an inhibitory effect on cortical motor areas, which can impair sequential response selection when this inhibition is strengthened by tDCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66474972019-08-06 The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection Jongkees, Bryant J. Immink, Maarten A. Boer, Olga D. Yavari, Fatemeh Nitsche, Michael A. Colzato, Lorenza S. Cerebellum Original Paper Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum’s inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in fine motor control and motor coordination, we investigated whether cerebellar tDCS can modulate response selection processes and motor sequence learning. Seventy-two participants received either cerebellar anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (placebo) tDCS while performing a serial reaction time task (SRTT). To compare acute and long-term effects of stimulation on behavioral performance, participants came back for follow-up testing at 24 h after stimulation. Results indicated no group differences in performance prior to tDCS. During stimulation, tDCS did not affect sequence-specific learning, but anodal as compared to cathodal and sham stimulations did modulate response selection processes. Specifically, anodal tDCS increased response latencies independent of whether a trained or transfer sequence was being performed, although this effect became smaller throughout training. At the 24-h follow-up, the group that previously received anodal tDCS again demonstrated increased response latencies, but only when the previously trained sequence and a transfer sequence had to be performed in the same experimental block. This increased behavioral interference tentatively points to a detrimental effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on sequence consolidation/retention. These results are consistent with the notion that the cerebellum exerts an inhibitory effect on cortical motor areas, which can impair sequential response selection when this inhibition is strengthened by tDCS. Springer US 2019-05-06 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647497/ /pubmed/31062282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01029-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jongkees, Bryant J.
Immink, Maarten A.
Boer, Olga D.
Yavari, Fatemeh
Nitsche, Michael A.
Colzato, Lorenza S.
The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
title The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
title_full The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
title_fullStr The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
title_short The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection
title_sort effect of cerebellar tdcs on sequential motor response selection
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01029-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jongkeesbryantj theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT imminkmaartena theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT boerolgad theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT yavarifatemeh theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT nitschemichaela theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT colzatolorenzas theeffectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT jongkeesbryantj effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT imminkmaartena effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT boerolgad effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT yavarifatemeh effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT nitschemichaela effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection
AT colzatolorenzas effectofcerebellartdcsonsequentialmotorresponseselection