Cargando…
Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants are sensitive to small changes in resource availability, but few previous studies have examined how differences in nutrient and prey availability affect investment in and the benefit of carnivory. We studied the impact of site-level differences in resource ava...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31402798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3484-6 |
_version_ | 1783437747011190784 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Joni L. Newton, J. Millett, J. |
author_facet | Cook, Joni L. Newton, J. Millett, J. |
author_sort | Cook, Joni L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants are sensitive to small changes in resource availability, but few previous studies have examined how differences in nutrient and prey availability affect investment in and the benefit of carnivory. We studied the impact of site-level differences in resource availability on ecophysiological traits of carnivory for Drosera rotundifolia L. METHODS: We measured prey availability, investment in carnivory (leaf stickiness), prey capture and diet of plants growing in two bogs with differences in N deposition and plant available N: Cors Fochno (0.62 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 353 μg l(−1)), Whixall Moss (1.37 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 1505 μg l(−1)). The total N amount per plant and the contributions of prey/root N to the plants’ N budget were calculated using a single isotope natural abundance method. RESULTS: Plants at Whixall Moss invested less in carnivory, were less likely to capture prey, and were less reliant on prey-derived N (25.5% compared with 49.4%). Actual prey capture did not differ between sites. Diet composition differed – Cors Fochno plants captured 62% greater proportions of Diptera. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show site-level differences in plant diet and nutrition consistent with differences in resource availability. Similarity in actual prey capture may be explained by differences in leaf stickiness and prey abundance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66475512019-08-09 Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia Cook, Joni L. Newton, J. Millett, J. Plant Soil Regular Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants are sensitive to small changes in resource availability, but few previous studies have examined how differences in nutrient and prey availability affect investment in and the benefit of carnivory. We studied the impact of site-level differences in resource availability on ecophysiological traits of carnivory for Drosera rotundifolia L. METHODS: We measured prey availability, investment in carnivory (leaf stickiness), prey capture and diet of plants growing in two bogs with differences in N deposition and plant available N: Cors Fochno (0.62 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 353 μg l(−1)), Whixall Moss (1.37 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 1505 μg l(−1)). The total N amount per plant and the contributions of prey/root N to the plants’ N budget were calculated using a single isotope natural abundance method. RESULTS: Plants at Whixall Moss invested less in carnivory, were less likely to capture prey, and were less reliant on prey-derived N (25.5% compared with 49.4%). Actual prey capture did not differ between sites. Diet composition differed – Cors Fochno plants captured 62% greater proportions of Diptera. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show site-level differences in plant diet and nutrition consistent with differences in resource availability. Similarity in actual prey capture may be explained by differences in leaf stickiness and prey abundance. Springer International Publishing 2017-11-18 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6647551/ /pubmed/31402798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3484-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Cook, Joni L. Newton, J. Millett, J. Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia |
title | Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia |
title_full | Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia |
title_fullStr | Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia |
title_short | Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia |
title_sort | environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant drosera rotundifolia |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31402798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3484-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookjonil environmentaldifferencesbetweensitescontrolthedietandnutritionofthecarnivorousplantdroserarotundifolia AT newtonj environmentaldifferencesbetweensitescontrolthedietandnutritionofthecarnivorousplantdroserarotundifolia AT millettj environmentaldifferencesbetweensitescontrolthedietandnutritionofthecarnivorousplantdroserarotundifolia |