Cargando…

Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants are sensitive to small changes in resource availability, but few previous studies have examined how differences in nutrient and prey availability affect investment in and the benefit of carnivory. We studied the impact of site-level differences in resource ava...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Joni L., Newton, J., Millett, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31402798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3484-6
_version_ 1783437747011190784
author Cook, Joni L.
Newton, J.
Millett, J.
author_facet Cook, Joni L.
Newton, J.
Millett, J.
author_sort Cook, Joni L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants are sensitive to small changes in resource availability, but few previous studies have examined how differences in nutrient and prey availability affect investment in and the benefit of carnivory. We studied the impact of site-level differences in resource availability on ecophysiological traits of carnivory for Drosera rotundifolia L. METHODS: We measured prey availability, investment in carnivory (leaf stickiness), prey capture and diet of plants growing in two bogs with differences in N deposition and plant available N: Cors Fochno (0.62 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 353 μg l(−1)), Whixall Moss (1.37 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 1505 μg l(−1)). The total N amount per plant and the contributions of prey/root N to the plants’ N budget were calculated using a single isotope natural abundance method. RESULTS: Plants at Whixall Moss invested less in carnivory, were less likely to capture prey, and were less reliant on prey-derived N (25.5% compared with 49.4%). Actual prey capture did not differ between sites. Diet composition differed – Cors Fochno plants captured 62% greater proportions of Diptera. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show site-level differences in plant diet and nutrition consistent with differences in resource availability. Similarity in actual prey capture may be explained by differences in leaf stickiness and prey abundance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66475512019-08-09 Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia Cook, Joni L. Newton, J. Millett, J. Plant Soil Regular Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carnivorous plants are sensitive to small changes in resource availability, but few previous studies have examined how differences in nutrient and prey availability affect investment in and the benefit of carnivory. We studied the impact of site-level differences in resource availability on ecophysiological traits of carnivory for Drosera rotundifolia L. METHODS: We measured prey availability, investment in carnivory (leaf stickiness), prey capture and diet of plants growing in two bogs with differences in N deposition and plant available N: Cors Fochno (0.62 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 353 μg l(−1)), Whixall Moss (1.37 g m(−2) yr.(−1), 1505 μg l(−1)). The total N amount per plant and the contributions of prey/root N to the plants’ N budget were calculated using a single isotope natural abundance method. RESULTS: Plants at Whixall Moss invested less in carnivory, were less likely to capture prey, and were less reliant on prey-derived N (25.5% compared with 49.4%). Actual prey capture did not differ between sites. Diet composition differed – Cors Fochno plants captured 62% greater proportions of Diptera. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show site-level differences in plant diet and nutrition consistent with differences in resource availability. Similarity in actual prey capture may be explained by differences in leaf stickiness and prey abundance. Springer International Publishing 2017-11-18 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6647551/ /pubmed/31402798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3484-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Cook, Joni L.
Newton, J.
Millett, J.
Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
title Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
title_full Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
title_fullStr Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
title_full_unstemmed Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
title_short Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia
title_sort environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant drosera rotundifolia
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31402798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3484-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cookjonil environmentaldifferencesbetweensitescontrolthedietandnutritionofthecarnivorousplantdroserarotundifolia
AT newtonj environmentaldifferencesbetweensitescontrolthedietandnutritionofthecarnivorousplantdroserarotundifolia
AT millettj environmentaldifferencesbetweensitescontrolthedietandnutritionofthecarnivorousplantdroserarotundifolia