Cargando…
On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
This paper presents how the magnetosphere–plasmasphere–ionosphere system was affected as a whole during the geomagnetic storm peaking on 27 May 2017. The interplanetary conditions, the magnetospheric response in terms of the magnetopause motion, and the ionospheric current flow pattern were investig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31402843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0 |
_version_ | 1783437748204470272 |
---|---|
author | Pezzopane, Michael Del Corpo, Afredo Piersanti, Mirko Cesaroni, Claudio Pignalberi, Alessio Di Matteo, Simone Spogli, Luca Vellante, Massimo Heilig, Balazs |
author_facet | Pezzopane, Michael Del Corpo, Afredo Piersanti, Mirko Cesaroni, Claudio Pignalberi, Alessio Di Matteo, Simone Spogli, Luca Vellante, Massimo Heilig, Balazs |
author_sort | Pezzopane, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents how the magnetosphere–plasmasphere–ionosphere system was affected as a whole during the geomagnetic storm peaking on 27 May 2017. The interplanetary conditions, the magnetospheric response in terms of the magnetopause motion, and the ionospheric current flow pattern were investigated using data, respectively, from the WIND spacecraft, from GOES15, GOES13, THEMIS E, THEMIS D and THEMIS A satellites and from the INTERMAGNET magnetometer array. The main objective of the work is to investigate the plasmaspheric dynamics under disturbed conditions and its possible relation to the ionospheric one; to reach this goal, the equatorial plasma mass densities derived from geomagnetic field line resonance observations at the European quasi-Meridional Magnetometer Array (EMMA) and total electron content values obtained through three GPS receivers close to EMMA were jointly considered. Despite the complexity of physical mechanisms behind them, we found a similarity between the ionospheric and plasmaspheric characteristic recovery times. Specifically, the ionospheric characteristic time turned out to be ~ 1.5 days, ~ 2 days and ~ 3.1 days, respectively, at L ~ 3, L ~ 4 and L ~ 5, while the plasmaspheric one, for similar L values, ranged from ~ 1 day to more than 4 days. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66475772019-08-09 On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 Pezzopane, Michael Del Corpo, Afredo Piersanti, Mirko Cesaroni, Claudio Pignalberi, Alessio Di Matteo, Simone Spogli, Luca Vellante, Massimo Heilig, Balazs Earth Planets Space Full Paper This paper presents how the magnetosphere–plasmasphere–ionosphere system was affected as a whole during the geomagnetic storm peaking on 27 May 2017. The interplanetary conditions, the magnetospheric response in terms of the magnetopause motion, and the ionospheric current flow pattern were investigated using data, respectively, from the WIND spacecraft, from GOES15, GOES13, THEMIS E, THEMIS D and THEMIS A satellites and from the INTERMAGNET magnetometer array. The main objective of the work is to investigate the plasmaspheric dynamics under disturbed conditions and its possible relation to the ionospheric one; to reach this goal, the equatorial plasma mass densities derived from geomagnetic field line resonance observations at the European quasi-Meridional Magnetometer Array (EMMA) and total electron content values obtained through three GPS receivers close to EMMA were jointly considered. Despite the complexity of physical mechanisms behind them, we found a similarity between the ionospheric and plasmaspheric characteristic recovery times. Specifically, the ionospheric characteristic time turned out to be ~ 1.5 days, ~ 2 days and ~ 3.1 days, respectively, at L ~ 3, L ~ 4 and L ~ 5, while the plasmaspheric one, for similar L values, ranged from ~ 1 day to more than 4 days. [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-07-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647577/ /pubmed/31402843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Pezzopane, Michael Del Corpo, Afredo Piersanti, Mirko Cesaroni, Claudio Pignalberi, Alessio Di Matteo, Simone Spogli, Luca Vellante, Massimo Heilig, Balazs On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 |
title | On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 |
title_full | On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 |
title_fullStr | On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 |
title_short | On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017 |
title_sort | on some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 may 2017 |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31402843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pezzopanemichael onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT delcorpoafredo onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT piersantimirko onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT cesaroniclaudio onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT pignalberialessio onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT dimatteosimone onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT spogliluca onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT vellantemassimo onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 AT heiligbalazs onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017 |