Cargando…
High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics
AIM: High-intensity focused ultrasound cystoplasty (UCP) aims to noninvasively and selectively target the ciliary body, thus lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). To be used on a large scale, the safety of the UCP procedure should be studied. Therefore, its effect on pupil behavior is important to be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354201 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1253 |
_version_ | 1783437757098491904 |
---|---|
author | Sousa, David C Ferreira, Nuno P Marques-Neves, Carlos Somers, Alix Vandewalle, Evelien Stalmans, Ingeborg Pinto, Luís Abegão |
author_facet | Sousa, David C Ferreira, Nuno P Marques-Neves, Carlos Somers, Alix Vandewalle, Evelien Stalmans, Ingeborg Pinto, Luís Abegão |
author_sort | Sousa, David C |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: High-intensity focused ultrasound cystoplasty (UCP) aims to noninvasively and selectively target the ciliary body, thus lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). To be used on a large scale, the safety of the UCP procedure should be studied. Therefore, its effect on pupil behavior is important to better inform patients and to help physicians predict possible treatment side effects. This study aimed to evaluate to what extent UCP procedure (EyeOP-1®) affects pupil dynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive glaucoma patients with uncontrolled IOP despite optimal medication scheduled for UCP treatment were recruited and followed for 6 months. Pupillometry (PlusoptiX(®) S0(4)) was performed at baseline, and 1, 3 and 6 months after UCP procedure at scotopic and mesopic conditions. The difference between pupil diameter (PD) in both lighting conditions was calculated at the three follow-up visits. Demographic, clinical characteristics and specific ocular parameters (anterior chamber depth and volume, white-to-white measurement, axial length, phakic status) were registered. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 14.1. RESULTS: Sixteen eyes of 16 patients with a mean age of 69 ± 11 years were included. Mean preoperative IOP and number of medications were 23.6 ± 3.0 mm Hg and 2.4 ± 1.3, respectively. Mean baseline scotopic and mesopic PD were 4.8 ± 0.8 mm and 4.4 ± 0.9 mm, respectively (difference = 0.38 ± 0.30 mm; range 0.1 to 1.2 mm). At month-1, the pupil diameter (PD) change between scotopic (4.6 ± 0.7 mm) and mesopic (4.5 ± 0.8 mm) conditions decreased to 0.03 ± 0.34 mm, p = 0.01. On the longer follow-up periods, however, the amplitude difference in PD compared to baseline was no longer significant (month-3: 0.28 ± 0.49 mm; month 6: 0.23 ± 0.41 mm; p >0.05). At the end of follow-up, mean scotopic and mesopic PD were 4.7 ± 1.0 mm and 4.4 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In the early postoperative period after UCP treatment, most patients present with a less light-reactive pupil, which seems to normalize with time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sousa DC, Ferreira NP, Marques-Neves C, Somers A, Vandewalle E, Stalmans I, Pinto LA. High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(3):102-106. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6647825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66478252019-07-26 High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics Sousa, David C Ferreira, Nuno P Marques-Neves, Carlos Somers, Alix Vandewalle, Evelien Stalmans, Ingeborg Pinto, Luís Abegão J Curr Glaucoma Pract Original Article AIM: High-intensity focused ultrasound cystoplasty (UCP) aims to noninvasively and selectively target the ciliary body, thus lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). To be used on a large scale, the safety of the UCP procedure should be studied. Therefore, its effect on pupil behavior is important to better inform patients and to help physicians predict possible treatment side effects. This study aimed to evaluate to what extent UCP procedure (EyeOP-1®) affects pupil dynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive glaucoma patients with uncontrolled IOP despite optimal medication scheduled for UCP treatment were recruited and followed for 6 months. Pupillometry (PlusoptiX(®) S0(4)) was performed at baseline, and 1, 3 and 6 months after UCP procedure at scotopic and mesopic conditions. The difference between pupil diameter (PD) in both lighting conditions was calculated at the three follow-up visits. Demographic, clinical characteristics and specific ocular parameters (anterior chamber depth and volume, white-to-white measurement, axial length, phakic status) were registered. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 14.1. RESULTS: Sixteen eyes of 16 patients with a mean age of 69 ± 11 years were included. Mean preoperative IOP and number of medications were 23.6 ± 3.0 mm Hg and 2.4 ± 1.3, respectively. Mean baseline scotopic and mesopic PD were 4.8 ± 0.8 mm and 4.4 ± 0.9 mm, respectively (difference = 0.38 ± 0.30 mm; range 0.1 to 1.2 mm). At month-1, the pupil diameter (PD) change between scotopic (4.6 ± 0.7 mm) and mesopic (4.5 ± 0.8 mm) conditions decreased to 0.03 ± 0.34 mm, p = 0.01. On the longer follow-up periods, however, the amplitude difference in PD compared to baseline was no longer significant (month-3: 0.28 ± 0.49 mm; month 6: 0.23 ± 0.41 mm; p >0.05). At the end of follow-up, mean scotopic and mesopic PD were 4.7 ± 1.0 mm and 4.4 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In the early postoperative period after UCP treatment, most patients present with a less light-reactive pupil, which seems to normalize with time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sousa DC, Ferreira NP, Marques-Neves C, Somers A, Vandewalle E, Stalmans I, Pinto LA. High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(3):102-106. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6647825/ /pubmed/31354201 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1253 Text en Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sousa, David C Ferreira, Nuno P Marques-Neves, Carlos Somers, Alix Vandewalle, Evelien Stalmans, Ingeborg Pinto, Luís Abegão High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics |
title | High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics |
title_full | High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics |
title_fullStr | High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics |
title_short | High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics |
title_sort | high-intensity focused ultrasound cycloplasty: analysis of pupil dynamics |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354201 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sousadavidc highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics AT ferreiranunop highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics AT marquesnevescarlos highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics AT somersalix highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics AT vandewalleevelien highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics AT stalmansingeborg highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics AT pintoluisabegao highintensityfocusedultrasoundcycloplastyanalysisofpupildynamics |