Cargando…

“Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference

To date, there is no shared consensus on a definition of a complex abdominal wall in elective surgery and in the emergency, on indications, technical details, complications, and follow-up. The purpose of the conference was to lay the foundations for a homogeneous approach to the complex abdominal wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piccoli, Micaela, Agresta, Ferdinando, Attinà, Grazia Maria, Amabile, Dalia, Marchi, Domenico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0577-6
_version_ 1783437765063475200
author Piccoli, Micaela
Agresta, Ferdinando
Attinà, Grazia Maria
Amabile, Dalia
Marchi, Domenico
author_facet Piccoli, Micaela
Agresta, Ferdinando
Attinà, Grazia Maria
Amabile, Dalia
Marchi, Domenico
author_sort Piccoli, Micaela
collection PubMed
description To date, there is no shared consensus on a definition of a complex abdominal wall in elective surgery and in the emergency, on indications, technical details, complications, and follow-up. The purpose of the conference was to lay the foundations for a homogeneous approach to the complex abdominal wall with the primary intent being to attain the following objectives: (1) to develop evidence-based recommendations to define “complex abdominal wall”; (2) indications in emergency and in elective cases; (3) management of “complex abdominal wall”; (4) techniques for temporary abdominal closure. The decompressive laparostomy should be considered in a case of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with critical conditions or after the failure of a medical treatment or less invasive methods. In the second one, beyond different mechanism, patients with surgical emergency diseases might reach the same pathophysiological end point of trauma patients where a preventive “open abdomen” might be indicated (a temporary abdominal closure: in the case of a non-infected field, the Wittmann patch and the NPWT had the best outcome followed by meshes; in the case of an infected field, NPWT techniques seem to be the preferred). The second priority is to create optimal both general as local conditions for healing: the right antimicrobial management, feeding—preferably by the enteral route—and managing correctly the open abdomen wall. The use of a mesh appears to be—if and when possible—the gold standard. There is a lot of enthusiasm about biological meshes. But the actual evidence supports their use only in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields but above all, to reduce the higher rate of recurrences, the wall anatomy and function should be restored in the midline, with or without component separation technique. On the other site has not to be neglected that the use of monofilament and macroporous non-absorbable meshes, in extraperitoneal position, in the setting of the complex abdomen with contamination, seems to have a cost effective role too. The idea of this consensus conference was mainly to try to bring order in the so copious, but not always so “evident” literature utilizing and exchanging the expertise of different specialists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6647889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66478892019-08-09 “Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference Piccoli, Micaela Agresta, Ferdinando Attinà, Grazia Maria Amabile, Dalia Marchi, Domenico Updates Surg Consensus Conference To date, there is no shared consensus on a definition of a complex abdominal wall in elective surgery and in the emergency, on indications, technical details, complications, and follow-up. The purpose of the conference was to lay the foundations for a homogeneous approach to the complex abdominal wall with the primary intent being to attain the following objectives: (1) to develop evidence-based recommendations to define “complex abdominal wall”; (2) indications in emergency and in elective cases; (3) management of “complex abdominal wall”; (4) techniques for temporary abdominal closure. The decompressive laparostomy should be considered in a case of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with critical conditions or after the failure of a medical treatment or less invasive methods. In the second one, beyond different mechanism, patients with surgical emergency diseases might reach the same pathophysiological end point of trauma patients where a preventive “open abdomen” might be indicated (a temporary abdominal closure: in the case of a non-infected field, the Wittmann patch and the NPWT had the best outcome followed by meshes; in the case of an infected field, NPWT techniques seem to be the preferred). The second priority is to create optimal both general as local conditions for healing: the right antimicrobial management, feeding—preferably by the enteral route—and managing correctly the open abdomen wall. The use of a mesh appears to be—if and when possible—the gold standard. There is a lot of enthusiasm about biological meshes. But the actual evidence supports their use only in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields but above all, to reduce the higher rate of recurrences, the wall anatomy and function should be restored in the midline, with or without component separation technique. On the other site has not to be neglected that the use of monofilament and macroporous non-absorbable meshes, in extraperitoneal position, in the setting of the complex abdomen with contamination, seems to have a cost effective role too. The idea of this consensus conference was mainly to try to bring order in the so copious, but not always so “evident” literature utilizing and exchanging the expertise of different specialists. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6647889/ /pubmed/30255435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0577-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Consensus Conference
Piccoli, Micaela
Agresta, Ferdinando
Attinà, Grazia Maria
Amabile, Dalia
Marchi, Domenico
“Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference
title “Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference
title_full “Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference
title_fullStr “Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference
title_full_unstemmed “Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference
title_short “Complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference
title_sort “complex abdominal wall” management: evidence-based guidelines of the italian consensus conference
topic Consensus Conference
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6647889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0577-6
work_keys_str_mv AT piccolimicaela complexabdominalwallmanagementevidencebasedguidelinesoftheitalianconsensusconference
AT agrestaferdinando complexabdominalwallmanagementevidencebasedguidelinesoftheitalianconsensusconference
AT attinagraziamaria complexabdominalwallmanagementevidencebasedguidelinesoftheitalianconsensusconference
AT amabiledalia complexabdominalwallmanagementevidencebasedguidelinesoftheitalianconsensusconference
AT marchidomenico complexabdominalwallmanagementevidencebasedguidelinesoftheitalianconsensusconference
AT complexabdominalwallmanagementevidencebasedguidelinesoftheitalianconsensusconference