Cargando…

Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering

[Image: see text] The water splitting activity of hematite is sensitive to the film processing parameters due to limiting factors such as a short hole diffusion length, slow oxygen evolution kinetics, and poor light absorptivity. In this work, we use direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering as a fas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinha, Rochan, Lavrijsen, Reinoud, Verheijen, Marcel A., Zoethout, Erwin, Genuit, Han, van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M., Bieberle-Hütter, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31460015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03349
_version_ 1783437811092815872
author Sinha, Rochan
Lavrijsen, Reinoud
Verheijen, Marcel A.
Zoethout, Erwin
Genuit, Han
van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M.
Bieberle-Hütter, Anja
author_facet Sinha, Rochan
Lavrijsen, Reinoud
Verheijen, Marcel A.
Zoethout, Erwin
Genuit, Han
van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M.
Bieberle-Hütter, Anja
author_sort Sinha, Rochan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The water splitting activity of hematite is sensitive to the film processing parameters due to limiting factors such as a short hole diffusion length, slow oxygen evolution kinetics, and poor light absorptivity. In this work, we use direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering as a fast and cost-effective route to deposit metallic iron thin films, which are annealed in air to obtain well-adhering hematite thin films on F:SnO(2)-coated glass substrates. These films are compared to annealed hematite films, which are deposited by reactive radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering, which is usually used for depositing metal oxide thin films, but displays an order of magnitude lower deposition rate. We find that DC sputtered films have much higher photoelectrochemical activity than reactive RF sputtered films. We show that this is related to differences in the morphology and surface composition of the films as a result of the different processing parameters. This in turn results in faster oxygen evolution kinetics and lower surface and bulk recombination effects. Thus, fabricating hematite thin films by fast and cost-efficient metallic iron deposition using DC magnetron sputtering is shown to be a valid and industrially relevant route for hematite photoanode fabrication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6648137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66481372019-08-27 Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering Sinha, Rochan Lavrijsen, Reinoud Verheijen, Marcel A. Zoethout, Erwin Genuit, Han van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M. Bieberle-Hütter, Anja ACS Omega [Image: see text] The water splitting activity of hematite is sensitive to the film processing parameters due to limiting factors such as a short hole diffusion length, slow oxygen evolution kinetics, and poor light absorptivity. In this work, we use direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering as a fast and cost-effective route to deposit metallic iron thin films, which are annealed in air to obtain well-adhering hematite thin films on F:SnO(2)-coated glass substrates. These films are compared to annealed hematite films, which are deposited by reactive radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering, which is usually used for depositing metal oxide thin films, but displays an order of magnitude lower deposition rate. We find that DC sputtered films have much higher photoelectrochemical activity than reactive RF sputtered films. We show that this is related to differences in the morphology and surface composition of the films as a result of the different processing parameters. This in turn results in faster oxygen evolution kinetics and lower surface and bulk recombination effects. Thus, fabricating hematite thin films by fast and cost-efficient metallic iron deposition using DC magnetron sputtering is shown to be a valid and industrially relevant route for hematite photoanode fabrication. American Chemical Society 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6648137/ /pubmed/31460015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03349 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Sinha, Rochan
Lavrijsen, Reinoud
Verheijen, Marcel A.
Zoethout, Erwin
Genuit, Han
van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M.
Bieberle-Hütter, Anja
Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
title Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
title_full Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
title_fullStr Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
title_short Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
title_sort electrochemistry of sputtered hematite photoanodes: a comparison of metallic dc versus reactive rf sputtering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31460015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03349
work_keys_str_mv AT sinharochan electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering
AT lavrijsenreinoud electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering
AT verheijenmarcela electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering
AT zoethouterwin electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering
AT genuithan electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering
AT vandesandenmauritiuscm electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering
AT bieberlehutteranja electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering