Cargando…
Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering
[Image: see text] The water splitting activity of hematite is sensitive to the film processing parameters due to limiting factors such as a short hole diffusion length, slow oxygen evolution kinetics, and poor light absorptivity. In this work, we use direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering as a fas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31460015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03349 |
_version_ | 1783437811092815872 |
---|---|
author | Sinha, Rochan Lavrijsen, Reinoud Verheijen, Marcel A. Zoethout, Erwin Genuit, Han van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M. Bieberle-Hütter, Anja |
author_facet | Sinha, Rochan Lavrijsen, Reinoud Verheijen, Marcel A. Zoethout, Erwin Genuit, Han van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M. Bieberle-Hütter, Anja |
author_sort | Sinha, Rochan |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The water splitting activity of hematite is sensitive to the film processing parameters due to limiting factors such as a short hole diffusion length, slow oxygen evolution kinetics, and poor light absorptivity. In this work, we use direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering as a fast and cost-effective route to deposit metallic iron thin films, which are annealed in air to obtain well-adhering hematite thin films on F:SnO(2)-coated glass substrates. These films are compared to annealed hematite films, which are deposited by reactive radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering, which is usually used for depositing metal oxide thin films, but displays an order of magnitude lower deposition rate. We find that DC sputtered films have much higher photoelectrochemical activity than reactive RF sputtered films. We show that this is related to differences in the morphology and surface composition of the films as a result of the different processing parameters. This in turn results in faster oxygen evolution kinetics and lower surface and bulk recombination effects. Thus, fabricating hematite thin films by fast and cost-efficient metallic iron deposition using DC magnetron sputtering is shown to be a valid and industrially relevant route for hematite photoanode fabrication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6648137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66481372019-08-27 Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering Sinha, Rochan Lavrijsen, Reinoud Verheijen, Marcel A. Zoethout, Erwin Genuit, Han van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M. Bieberle-Hütter, Anja ACS Omega [Image: see text] The water splitting activity of hematite is sensitive to the film processing parameters due to limiting factors such as a short hole diffusion length, slow oxygen evolution kinetics, and poor light absorptivity. In this work, we use direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering as a fast and cost-effective route to deposit metallic iron thin films, which are annealed in air to obtain well-adhering hematite thin films on F:SnO(2)-coated glass substrates. These films are compared to annealed hematite films, which are deposited by reactive radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering, which is usually used for depositing metal oxide thin films, but displays an order of magnitude lower deposition rate. We find that DC sputtered films have much higher photoelectrochemical activity than reactive RF sputtered films. We show that this is related to differences in the morphology and surface composition of the films as a result of the different processing parameters. This in turn results in faster oxygen evolution kinetics and lower surface and bulk recombination effects. Thus, fabricating hematite thin films by fast and cost-efficient metallic iron deposition using DC magnetron sputtering is shown to be a valid and industrially relevant route for hematite photoanode fabrication. American Chemical Society 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6648137/ /pubmed/31460015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03349 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Sinha, Rochan Lavrijsen, Reinoud Verheijen, Marcel A. Zoethout, Erwin Genuit, Han van de Sanden, Mauritius C. M. Bieberle-Hütter, Anja Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes: A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering |
title | Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes:
A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering |
title_full | Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes:
A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering |
title_fullStr | Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes:
A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes:
A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering |
title_short | Electrochemistry of Sputtered Hematite Photoanodes:
A Comparison of Metallic DC versus Reactive RF Sputtering |
title_sort | electrochemistry of sputtered hematite photoanodes:
a comparison of metallic dc versus reactive rf sputtering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31460015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinharochan electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering AT lavrijsenreinoud electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering AT verheijenmarcela electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering AT zoethouterwin electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering AT genuithan electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering AT vandesandenmauritiuscm electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering AT bieberlehutteranja electrochemistryofsputteredhematitephotoanodesacomparisonofmetallicdcversusreactiverfsputtering |