Cargando…

Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method

[Image: see text] The binding between two biomolecules is one of the most critical factors controlling many bioprocesses. Therefore, it is of great interest to derive a reliable method to calculate the free binding energy between two biomolecules. In this work, we have demonstrated that the binding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngo, Son Tung, Vu, Khanh B., Bui, Le Minh, Vu, Van V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03258
_version_ 1783437870951825408
author Ngo, Son Tung
Vu, Khanh B.
Bui, Le Minh
Vu, Van V.
author_facet Ngo, Son Tung
Vu, Khanh B.
Bui, Le Minh
Vu, Van V.
author_sort Ngo, Son Tung
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The binding between two biomolecules is one of the most critical factors controlling many bioprocesses. Therefore, it is of great interest to derive a reliable method to calculate the free binding energy between two biomolecules. In this work, we have demonstrated that the binding affinity of ligands to proteins can be determined through biased sampling simulations. The umbrella sampling (US) method was applied on 20 protein–ligand complexes, including the cathepsin K (CTSK), type II dehydroquinase (DHQase), heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), and factor Xa (FXa) systems. The ligand-binding affinity was evaluated as the difference between the largest and smallest values of the free-energy curve, which was obtained via a potential of mean force analysis. The calculated affinities differ sizably from the previously reported experimental values, with an average difference of ∼3.14 kcal/mol. However, the calculated results are in good correlation with the experimental data, with correlation coefficients of 0.76, 0.87, 0.96, and 0.97 for CTSK, DHQase, HSP90, and FXa, respectively. Thus, the binding free energy of a new ligand can be reliably estimated using our US approach. Furthermore, the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of binding affinity of these systems are 1.13, 0.90, 0.37, and 0.25 kcal/mol, for CTSK, DHQase, HSP90, and FXa, respectively. The small RMSE values indicate the good precision of the biased sampling method that can distinguish the ligands exhibiting similar binding affinities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6648447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66484472019-08-27 Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method Ngo, Son Tung Vu, Khanh B. Bui, Le Minh Vu, Van V. ACS Omega [Image: see text] The binding between two biomolecules is one of the most critical factors controlling many bioprocesses. Therefore, it is of great interest to derive a reliable method to calculate the free binding energy between two biomolecules. In this work, we have demonstrated that the binding affinity of ligands to proteins can be determined through biased sampling simulations. The umbrella sampling (US) method was applied on 20 protein–ligand complexes, including the cathepsin K (CTSK), type II dehydroquinase (DHQase), heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), and factor Xa (FXa) systems. The ligand-binding affinity was evaluated as the difference between the largest and smallest values of the free-energy curve, which was obtained via a potential of mean force analysis. The calculated affinities differ sizably from the previously reported experimental values, with an average difference of ∼3.14 kcal/mol. However, the calculated results are in good correlation with the experimental data, with correlation coefficients of 0.76, 0.87, 0.96, and 0.97 for CTSK, DHQase, HSP90, and FXa, respectively. Thus, the binding free energy of a new ligand can be reliably estimated using our US approach. Furthermore, the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of binding affinity of these systems are 1.13, 0.90, 0.37, and 0.25 kcal/mol, for CTSK, DHQase, HSP90, and FXa, respectively. The small RMSE values indicate the good precision of the biased sampling method that can distinguish the ligands exhibiting similar binding affinities. American Chemical Society 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6648447/ /pubmed/31459599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03258 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
spellingShingle Ngo, Son Tung
Vu, Khanh B.
Bui, Le Minh
Vu, Van V.
Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
title Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
title_full Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
title_fullStr Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
title_full_unstemmed Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
title_short Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
title_sort effective estimation of ligand-binding affinity using biased sampling method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03258
work_keys_str_mv AT ngosontung effectiveestimationofligandbindingaffinityusingbiasedsamplingmethod
AT vukhanhb effectiveestimationofligandbindingaffinityusingbiasedsamplingmethod
AT buileminh effectiveestimationofligandbindingaffinityusingbiasedsamplingmethod
AT vuvanv effectiveestimationofligandbindingaffinityusingbiasedsamplingmethod