Cargando…
Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
[Image: see text] Conductive natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites were prepared by solvent-casting suspensions of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), followed by vulcanization of the rubber composites. Both rGO and CNT were compatible as fillers in the NR as well as having suffici...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03630 |
_version_ | 1783437876990574592 |
---|---|
author | Capezza, Antonio Andersson, Richard L. Ström, Valter Wu, Qiong Sacchi, Benedetta Farris, Stefano Hedenqvist, Mikael S. Olsson, Richard T. |
author_facet | Capezza, Antonio Andersson, Richard L. Ström, Valter Wu, Qiong Sacchi, Benedetta Farris, Stefano Hedenqvist, Mikael S. Olsson, Richard T. |
author_sort | Capezza, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Conductive natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites were prepared by solvent-casting suspensions of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), followed by vulcanization of the rubber composites. Both rGO and CNT were compatible as fillers in the NR as well as having sufficient intrinsic electrical conductivity for functional applications. Physical (thermal) and chemical reduction of GO were investigated, and the results of the reductions were monitored by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for establishing a reduction protocol that was useful for the rGO nanocomposite preparation. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy showed that both nanofillers were adequately dispersed in the main NR phase. The CNT composite displays a marked mechanical hysteresis and higher elongation at break, in comparison to the rGO composites for an equal fraction of the carbon phase. Moreover, the composite conductivity was always ca. 3–4 orders of magnitude higher for the CNT composite than for the rGO composites, the former reaching a maximum conductivity of ca. 10.5 S/m, which was explained by the more favorable geometry of the CNT versus the rGO sheets. For low current density applications though, both composites achieved the necessary percolation and showed the electrical conductivity needed for being applied as flexible conductors for a light-emitting diode. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6648473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66484732019-08-27 Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics Capezza, Antonio Andersson, Richard L. Ström, Valter Wu, Qiong Sacchi, Benedetta Farris, Stefano Hedenqvist, Mikael S. Olsson, Richard T. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Conductive natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites were prepared by solvent-casting suspensions of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), followed by vulcanization of the rubber composites. Both rGO and CNT were compatible as fillers in the NR as well as having sufficient intrinsic electrical conductivity for functional applications. Physical (thermal) and chemical reduction of GO were investigated, and the results of the reductions were monitored by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for establishing a reduction protocol that was useful for the rGO nanocomposite preparation. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy showed that both nanofillers were adequately dispersed in the main NR phase. The CNT composite displays a marked mechanical hysteresis and higher elongation at break, in comparison to the rGO composites for an equal fraction of the carbon phase. Moreover, the composite conductivity was always ca. 3–4 orders of magnitude higher for the CNT composite than for the rGO composites, the former reaching a maximum conductivity of ca. 10.5 S/m, which was explained by the more favorable geometry of the CNT versus the rGO sheets. For low current density applications though, both composites achieved the necessary percolation and showed the electrical conductivity needed for being applied as flexible conductors for a light-emitting diode. American Chemical Society 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6648473/ /pubmed/31459561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03630 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Capezza, Antonio Andersson, Richard L. Ström, Valter Wu, Qiong Sacchi, Benedetta Farris, Stefano Hedenqvist, Mikael S. Olsson, Richard T. Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics |
title | Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide
and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible
Electronics |
title_full | Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide
and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible
Electronics |
title_fullStr | Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide
and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible
Electronics |
title_full_unstemmed | Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide
and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible
Electronics |
title_short | Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide
and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible
Electronics |
title_sort | preparation and comparison of reduced graphene oxide
and carbon nanotubes as fillers in conductive natural rubber for flexible
electronics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT capezzaantonio preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT anderssonrichardl preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT stromvalter preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT wuqiong preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT sacchibenedetta preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT farrisstefano preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT hedenqvistmikaels preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics AT olssonrichardt preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics |