Cargando…

Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics

[Image: see text] Conductive natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites were prepared by solvent-casting suspensions of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), followed by vulcanization of the rubber composites. Both rGO and CNT were compatible as fillers in the NR as well as having suffici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capezza, Antonio, Andersson, Richard L., Ström, Valter, Wu, Qiong, Sacchi, Benedetta, Farris, Stefano, Hedenqvist, Mikael S., Olsson, Richard T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03630
_version_ 1783437876990574592
author Capezza, Antonio
Andersson, Richard L.
Ström, Valter
Wu, Qiong
Sacchi, Benedetta
Farris, Stefano
Hedenqvist, Mikael S.
Olsson, Richard T.
author_facet Capezza, Antonio
Andersson, Richard L.
Ström, Valter
Wu, Qiong
Sacchi, Benedetta
Farris, Stefano
Hedenqvist, Mikael S.
Olsson, Richard T.
author_sort Capezza, Antonio
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Conductive natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites were prepared by solvent-casting suspensions of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), followed by vulcanization of the rubber composites. Both rGO and CNT were compatible as fillers in the NR as well as having sufficient intrinsic electrical conductivity for functional applications. Physical (thermal) and chemical reduction of GO were investigated, and the results of the reductions were monitored by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for establishing a reduction protocol that was useful for the rGO nanocomposite preparation. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy showed that both nanofillers were adequately dispersed in the main NR phase. The CNT composite displays a marked mechanical hysteresis and higher elongation at break, in comparison to the rGO composites for an equal fraction of the carbon phase. Moreover, the composite conductivity was always ca. 3–4 orders of magnitude higher for the CNT composite than for the rGO composites, the former reaching a maximum conductivity of ca. 10.5 S/m, which was explained by the more favorable geometry of the CNT versus the rGO sheets. For low current density applications though, both composites achieved the necessary percolation and showed the electrical conductivity needed for being applied as flexible conductors for a light-emitting diode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6648473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66484732019-08-27 Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics Capezza, Antonio Andersson, Richard L. Ström, Valter Wu, Qiong Sacchi, Benedetta Farris, Stefano Hedenqvist, Mikael S. Olsson, Richard T. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Conductive natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites were prepared by solvent-casting suspensions of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), followed by vulcanization of the rubber composites. Both rGO and CNT were compatible as fillers in the NR as well as having sufficient intrinsic electrical conductivity for functional applications. Physical (thermal) and chemical reduction of GO were investigated, and the results of the reductions were monitored by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for establishing a reduction protocol that was useful for the rGO nanocomposite preparation. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy showed that both nanofillers were adequately dispersed in the main NR phase. The CNT composite displays a marked mechanical hysteresis and higher elongation at break, in comparison to the rGO composites for an equal fraction of the carbon phase. Moreover, the composite conductivity was always ca. 3–4 orders of magnitude higher for the CNT composite than for the rGO composites, the former reaching a maximum conductivity of ca. 10.5 S/m, which was explained by the more favorable geometry of the CNT versus the rGO sheets. For low current density applications though, both composites achieved the necessary percolation and showed the electrical conductivity needed for being applied as flexible conductors for a light-emitting diode. American Chemical Society 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6648473/ /pubmed/31459561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03630 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Capezza, Antonio
Andersson, Richard L.
Ström, Valter
Wu, Qiong
Sacchi, Benedetta
Farris, Stefano
Hedenqvist, Mikael S.
Olsson, Richard T.
Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
title Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
title_full Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
title_fullStr Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
title_full_unstemmed Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
title_short Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics
title_sort preparation and comparison of reduced graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes as fillers in conductive natural rubber for flexible electronics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31459561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03630
work_keys_str_mv AT capezzaantonio preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT anderssonrichardl preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT stromvalter preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT wuqiong preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT sacchibenedetta preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT farrisstefano preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT hedenqvistmikaels preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics
AT olssonrichardt preparationandcomparisonofreducedgrapheneoxideandcarbonnanotubesasfillersinconductivenaturalrubberforflexibleelectronics