Cargando…
Performance of Cerium Oxides from Different Preparation Methods for Desulfurizing Hot Coal Gas
[Image: see text] Four CeO(2) samples were prepared by pyrolysis of cerium hydroxide, cerium nitrate, cerium oxalate, and cerium perchlorate. The structures of CeO(2) samples were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction and nitrogen adsorption–desorption. Temperature-programmed reduction and the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31460019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00247 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] Four CeO(2) samples were prepared by pyrolysis of cerium hydroxide, cerium nitrate, cerium oxalate, and cerium perchlorate. The structures of CeO(2) samples were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction and nitrogen adsorption–desorption. Temperature-programmed reduction and thermogravimetry tests were carried out to evaluate the reduction and sulfurization behaviors of the CeO(2) samples. The results indicate that the samples, prepared from different precursors, have larger surface areas and pore specific volumes, smaller average crystallite sizes, and better reducibilities (except the sample from cerium perchlorate) than the CeO(2) reagent. The sulfurization performances of CeO(2) samples are directly correlated with the reduction degrees of CeO(2) samples. Compared with fresh CeO(2) samples, reduced ones have better sulfurization performances. Among the four CeO(2) samples, the one prepared from cerium nitrate, with the best reducibility, exhibits the best performance in sulfurization. |
---|