Cargando…

Implementation of a rapid response team in a large nonprofit Brazilian hospital: improving the quality of emergency care through Plan-Do-Study-Act

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a rapid response team in a large nonprofit hospital, indicating relevant issues for other initiatives in similar contexts, particularly in Latin America. METHODS: In general terms, the intervention consisted of three major components: (1) a tool to detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Meire Cavalieri, Portela, Margareth Crisóstomo, Paiva, Elenir Pereira, Guimarães, Raquel Rodrigues, Pereira Neto, Wilson Coelho, Cardoso, Priscila Rodrigues, de Mattos, Daniel Angelo, Mendes, Izabela Maria Alvim de Castro Cunha, Tavares, Marcus Vinicius, Jácome, Guillermo Patrício Ortega, Fernandes, Guilherme Côrtes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6649208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215601
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20190036
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a rapid response team in a large nonprofit hospital, indicating relevant issues for other initiatives in similar contexts, particularly in Latin America. METHODS: In general terms, the intervention consisted of three major components: (1) a tool to detect aggravation of clinical conditions in general wards; (2) the structuring of a rapid response team to attend to all patients at risk; and (3) the monitoring of indicators regarding the intervention. This work employed four half-year Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test and adjust the intervention from January 2013 to December 2014. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2014, the rapid response team attended to 2,296 patients. This study showed a nonsignificant reduction in mortality from 8.3% in cycle 1 to 5.0% in cycle 4; however, death rates remained stable in cycles 3 and 4, with frequencies of 5.2% and 5.0%, respectively. Regarding patient flow and continuum of critical care, which is a premise of the rapid response system, there was a reduction in waiting time for intensive care unit beds with a decrease from 45.9% to 19.0% in the frequency of inpatients who could not be admitted immediately after indication (p < 0.001), representing improved patient flow in the hospital. In addition, an increase in the recognition of palliative care patients from 2.8% to 10.3% was noted (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Implementing a rapid response team in contexts where there are structural restrictions, such as lack of intensive care unit beds, may be very beneficial, but a strategy of adjustment is needed.