Cargando…
Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions
AIM: To give evidence around the acceptability of a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) of catheter washout solutions. DESIGN: A sample of senior community nursing staff (N = 7) were interviewed, and four focus groups with a sample of community nurses were conducted. Eleven semi‐structured fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.285 |
_version_ | 1783438177183203328 |
---|---|
author | Shepherd, Ashley Steel, Emma Taylor, Anne Mackay, William Gordon Hagen, Suzanne |
author_facet | Shepherd, Ashley Steel, Emma Taylor, Anne Mackay, William Gordon Hagen, Suzanne |
author_sort | Shepherd, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To give evidence around the acceptability of a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) of catheter washout solutions. DESIGN: A sample of senior community nursing staff (N = 7) were interviewed, and four focus groups with a sample of community nurses were conducted. Eleven semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were undertaken with patients using a long‐term catheter. METHODS: An in‐depth qualitative study using a phenomenological approach was employed. This approach was suitable to explore the lived experiences of patients and gain their viewpoints and experiences. RESULTS: Nurse participants raised concerns about the removal of washout treatment or increased risk of infection in relation to which arm of the trial patients were randomized to. There was concern that patients could get used to the increased contact with nursing staff. Six patients who agreed to participate cited personal benefit, benefiting others and a sense of indifference. Four patients were unsure about taking part and one declined. All cited concerns about negative implications for themselves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6650662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66506622019-07-31 Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions Shepherd, Ashley Steel, Emma Taylor, Anne Mackay, William Gordon Hagen, Suzanne Nurs Open Research Articles AIM: To give evidence around the acceptability of a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) of catheter washout solutions. DESIGN: A sample of senior community nursing staff (N = 7) were interviewed, and four focus groups with a sample of community nurses were conducted. Eleven semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were undertaken with patients using a long‐term catheter. METHODS: An in‐depth qualitative study using a phenomenological approach was employed. This approach was suitable to explore the lived experiences of patients and gain their viewpoints and experiences. RESULTS: Nurse participants raised concerns about the removal of washout treatment or increased risk of infection in relation to which arm of the trial patients were randomized to. There was concern that patients could get used to the increased contact with nursing staff. Six patients who agreed to participate cited personal benefit, benefiting others and a sense of indifference. Four patients were unsure about taking part and one declined. All cited concerns about negative implications for themselves. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6650662/ /pubmed/31367414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.285 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Shepherd, Ashley Steel, Emma Taylor, Anne Mackay, William Gordon Hagen, Suzanne Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
title | Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
title_full | Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
title_fullStr | Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
title_short | Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
title_sort | patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shepherdashley patientandcommunitynurseperspectivesonrecruitmenttoarandomizedcontrolledtrialofurinarycatheterwashoutsolutions AT steelemma patientandcommunitynurseperspectivesonrecruitmenttoarandomizedcontrolledtrialofurinarycatheterwashoutsolutions AT tayloranne patientandcommunitynurseperspectivesonrecruitmenttoarandomizedcontrolledtrialofurinarycatheterwashoutsolutions AT mackaywilliamgordon patientandcommunitynurseperspectivesonrecruitmenttoarandomizedcontrolledtrialofurinarycatheterwashoutsolutions AT hagensuzanne patientandcommunitynurseperspectivesonrecruitmenttoarandomizedcontrolledtrialofurinarycatheterwashoutsolutions |