Cargando…

Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla

Proper biological interpretation of a phylogeny can sometimes hinge on the placement of key taxa—or fail when such key taxa are not sampled. In this light, we here present the first attempt to investigate (though not conclusively resolve) animal relationships using genome-scale data from all phyla....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laumer, Christopher E., Fernández, Rosa, Lemer, Sarah, Combosch, David, Kocot, Kevin M., Riesgo, Ana, Andrade, Sónia C. S., Sterrer, Wolfgang, Sørensen, Martin V., Giribet, Gonzalo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0831
_version_ 1783438187446665216
author Laumer, Christopher E.
Fernández, Rosa
Lemer, Sarah
Combosch, David
Kocot, Kevin M.
Riesgo, Ana
Andrade, Sónia C. S.
Sterrer, Wolfgang
Sørensen, Martin V.
Giribet, Gonzalo
author_facet Laumer, Christopher E.
Fernández, Rosa
Lemer, Sarah
Combosch, David
Kocot, Kevin M.
Riesgo, Ana
Andrade, Sónia C. S.
Sterrer, Wolfgang
Sørensen, Martin V.
Giribet, Gonzalo
author_sort Laumer, Christopher E.
collection PubMed
description Proper biological interpretation of a phylogeny can sometimes hinge on the placement of key taxa—or fail when such key taxa are not sampled. In this light, we here present the first attempt to investigate (though not conclusively resolve) animal relationships using genome-scale data from all phyla. Results from the site-heterogeneous CAT + GTR model recapitulate many established major clades, and strongly confirm some recent discoveries, such as a monophyletic Lophophorata, and a sister group relationship between Gnathifera and Chaetognatha, raising continued questions on the nature of the spiralian ancestor. We also explore matrix construction with an eye towards testing specific relationships; this approach uniquely recovers support for Panarthropoda, and shows that Lophotrochozoa (a subclade of Spiralia) can be constructed in strongly conflicting ways using different taxon- and/or orthologue sets. Dayhoff-6 recoding sacrifices information, but can also reveal surprising outcomes, e.g. full support for a clade of Lophophorata and Entoprocta + Cycliophora, a clade of Placozoa + Cnidaria, and raising support for Ctenophora as sister group to the remaining Metazoa, in a manner dependent on the gene and/or taxon sampling of the matrix in question. Future work should test the hypothesis that the few remaining uncertainties in animal phylogeny might reflect violations of the various stationarity assumptions used in contemporary inference methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6650721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66507212019-07-28 Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla Laumer, Christopher E. Fernández, Rosa Lemer, Sarah Combosch, David Kocot, Kevin M. Riesgo, Ana Andrade, Sónia C. S. Sterrer, Wolfgang Sørensen, Martin V. Giribet, Gonzalo Proc Biol Sci Evolution Proper biological interpretation of a phylogeny can sometimes hinge on the placement of key taxa—or fail when such key taxa are not sampled. In this light, we here present the first attempt to investigate (though not conclusively resolve) animal relationships using genome-scale data from all phyla. Results from the site-heterogeneous CAT + GTR model recapitulate many established major clades, and strongly confirm some recent discoveries, such as a monophyletic Lophophorata, and a sister group relationship between Gnathifera and Chaetognatha, raising continued questions on the nature of the spiralian ancestor. We also explore matrix construction with an eye towards testing specific relationships; this approach uniquely recovers support for Panarthropoda, and shows that Lophotrochozoa (a subclade of Spiralia) can be constructed in strongly conflicting ways using different taxon- and/or orthologue sets. Dayhoff-6 recoding sacrifices information, but can also reveal surprising outcomes, e.g. full support for a clade of Lophophorata and Entoprocta + Cycliophora, a clade of Placozoa + Cnidaria, and raising support for Ctenophora as sister group to the remaining Metazoa, in a manner dependent on the gene and/or taxon sampling of the matrix in question. Future work should test the hypothesis that the few remaining uncertainties in animal phylogeny might reflect violations of the various stationarity assumptions used in contemporary inference methods. The Royal Society 2019-07-10 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6650721/ /pubmed/31288696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0831 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Evolution
Laumer, Christopher E.
Fernández, Rosa
Lemer, Sarah
Combosch, David
Kocot, Kevin M.
Riesgo, Ana
Andrade, Sónia C. S.
Sterrer, Wolfgang
Sørensen, Martin V.
Giribet, Gonzalo
Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
title Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
title_full Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
title_fullStr Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
title_short Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
title_sort revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla
topic Evolution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0831
work_keys_str_mv AT laumerchristophere revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT fernandezrosa revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT lemersarah revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT comboschdavid revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT kocotkevinm revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT riesgoana revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT andradesoniacs revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT sterrerwolfgang revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT sørensenmartinv revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla
AT giribetgonzalo revisitingmetazoanphylogenywithgenomicsamplingofallphyla