Cargando…
Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases
The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different sta...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132425 |
_version_ | 1783438199392043008 |
---|---|
author | Hirose, Tsunehisa Keck, Daniel Izumi, Yoshihiro Bamba, Takeshi |
author_facet | Hirose, Tsunehisa Keck, Daniel Izumi, Yoshihiro Bamba, Takeshi |
author_sort | Hirose, Tsunehisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different stationary phases. SFC separation conditions with polar stationary phases, such as silica gel (SL) and diol (Diol) phases, operate via adsorptions that include hydrophilic and ionic interactions similar to those in NP-HPLC. Moreover, non-polar stationary phases, such as pentabromophenyl (PBr), pyrenylethyl (PYE), and octadecyl (C(18)), could be used despite the non-polar mobile phase conditions, because the dispersion and π-π interactions were stronger in SFC than in HPLC. These results reflect the selectivity of the stationary phase and its retention factor, thus providing useful information for the selection of appropriate stationary phases for particular analytes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6650800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66508002019-08-07 Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases Hirose, Tsunehisa Keck, Daniel Izumi, Yoshihiro Bamba, Takeshi Molecules Article The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different stationary phases. SFC separation conditions with polar stationary phases, such as silica gel (SL) and diol (Diol) phases, operate via adsorptions that include hydrophilic and ionic interactions similar to those in NP-HPLC. Moreover, non-polar stationary phases, such as pentabromophenyl (PBr), pyrenylethyl (PYE), and octadecyl (C(18)), could be used despite the non-polar mobile phase conditions, because the dispersion and π-π interactions were stronger in SFC than in HPLC. These results reflect the selectivity of the stationary phase and its retention factor, thus providing useful information for the selection of appropriate stationary phases for particular analytes. MDPI 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6650800/ /pubmed/31269632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132425 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hirose, Tsunehisa Keck, Daniel Izumi, Yoshihiro Bamba, Takeshi Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases |
title | Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases |
title_full | Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases |
title_short | Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases |
title_sort | comparison of retention behavior between supercritical fluid chromatography and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with various stationary phases |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirosetsunehisa comparisonofretentionbehaviorbetweensupercriticalfluidchromatographyandnormalphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographywithvariousstationaryphases AT keckdaniel comparisonofretentionbehaviorbetweensupercriticalfluidchromatographyandnormalphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographywithvariousstationaryphases AT izumiyoshihiro comparisonofretentionbehaviorbetweensupercriticalfluidchromatographyandnormalphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographywithvariousstationaryphases AT bambatakeshi comparisonofretentionbehaviorbetweensupercriticalfluidchromatographyandnormalphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographywithvariousstationaryphases |