Cargando…

Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents

Background: This study aimed to compare the difference in cardiorespiratory fitness between Chinese and Japanese children and adolescents. Methods: Participants comprised 9025 children and adolescents aged 7–18 years from China and Japan. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured by performance i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xiaofang, Yin, Xiaojian, Ji, Liu, Song, Ge, Wu, Huipan, Li, Yuqiang, Wang, Guodong, Bi, Cunjian, Sun, Yi, Li, Ming, Zhang, Ting, Kato, Hiroshi, Suzuki, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132316
_version_ 1783438355417006080
author Yang, Xiaofang
Yin, Xiaojian
Ji, Liu
Song, Ge
Wu, Huipan
Li, Yuqiang
Wang, Guodong
Bi, Cunjian
Sun, Yi
Li, Ming
Zhang, Ting
Kato, Hiroshi
Suzuki, Akira
author_facet Yang, Xiaofang
Yin, Xiaojian
Ji, Liu
Song, Ge
Wu, Huipan
Li, Yuqiang
Wang, Guodong
Bi, Cunjian
Sun, Yi
Li, Ming
Zhang, Ting
Kato, Hiroshi
Suzuki, Akira
author_sort Yang, Xiaofang
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aimed to compare the difference in cardiorespiratory fitness between Chinese and Japanese children and adolescents. Methods: Participants comprised 9025 children and adolescents aged 7–18 years from China and Japan. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured by performance in the 20 m shuttle run test (20mSRT) and estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)). Differences in CRF between countries were evaluated by t-tests. Centile curves for the 20mSRT and VO(2max) values were constructed for Chinese and Japanese children and adolescents, respectively, using the Lambda Mu and Sigma (LMS) method. Results: (1) For most of the age groups, the 20mSRT and VO(2max) performances among Chinese participants were lower than among Japanese participants. (2) Japanese children had the most apparent gains in P(10), P(50), and P(90) VO(2max) values in primary school; however, they gradually decreased in middle school. For Chinese girls, the P(10), P(50), and P(90) VO(2max) values decreased gradually with age. (3) The VO(2max) value among Japanese children increased; however, it decreased or remained flat among Chinese children in primary school. Conclusions: CRF among Chinese participants was lower than among Japanese participants while the VO(2max) value showed different trends in primary school. Effective measures should be taken to improve CRF among children and adolescents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6651475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66514752019-08-08 Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents Yang, Xiaofang Yin, Xiaojian Ji, Liu Song, Ge Wu, Huipan Li, Yuqiang Wang, Guodong Bi, Cunjian Sun, Yi Li, Ming Zhang, Ting Kato, Hiroshi Suzuki, Akira Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: This study aimed to compare the difference in cardiorespiratory fitness between Chinese and Japanese children and adolescents. Methods: Participants comprised 9025 children and adolescents aged 7–18 years from China and Japan. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured by performance in the 20 m shuttle run test (20mSRT) and estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)). Differences in CRF between countries were evaluated by t-tests. Centile curves for the 20mSRT and VO(2max) values were constructed for Chinese and Japanese children and adolescents, respectively, using the Lambda Mu and Sigma (LMS) method. Results: (1) For most of the age groups, the 20mSRT and VO(2max) performances among Chinese participants were lower than among Japanese participants. (2) Japanese children had the most apparent gains in P(10), P(50), and P(90) VO(2max) values in primary school; however, they gradually decreased in middle school. For Chinese girls, the P(10), P(50), and P(90) VO(2max) values decreased gradually with age. (3) The VO(2max) value among Japanese children increased; however, it decreased or remained flat among Chinese children in primary school. Conclusions: CRF among Chinese participants was lower than among Japanese participants while the VO(2max) value showed different trends in primary school. Effective measures should be taken to improve CRF among children and adolescents. MDPI 2019-06-30 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6651475/ /pubmed/31261980 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132316 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Xiaofang
Yin, Xiaojian
Ji, Liu
Song, Ge
Wu, Huipan
Li, Yuqiang
Wang, Guodong
Bi, Cunjian
Sun, Yi
Li, Ming
Zhang, Ting
Kato, Hiroshi
Suzuki, Akira
Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents
title Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents
title_full Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents
title_fullStr Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents
title_short Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents
title_sort differences in cardiorespiratory fitness between chinese and japanese children and adolescents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132316
work_keys_str_mv AT yangxiaofang differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT yinxiaojian differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT jiliu differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT songge differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT wuhuipan differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT liyuqiang differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT wangguodong differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT bicunjian differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT sunyi differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT liming differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT zhangting differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT katohiroshi differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents
AT suzukiakira differencesincardiorespiratoryfitnessbetweenchineseandjapanesechildrenandadolescents