Cargando…

The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery

BACKGROUND: Pelvic tumors are usually resected through the utilitarian pelvic incision, an extended ilioinguinal/iliofemoral approach. The pararectus approach, an intrapelvic anatomical approach with extraperitoneal access to the pelvis, has been established previously for the treatment of pelvic an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurze, Christophe, Keel, Marius Johann Baptist, Kollár, Attila, Siebenrock, Klaus Arno, Klenke, Frank Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1275-x
_version_ 1783438461289627648
author Kurze, Christophe
Keel, Marius Johann Baptist
Kollár, Attila
Siebenrock, Klaus Arno
Klenke, Frank Michael
author_facet Kurze, Christophe
Keel, Marius Johann Baptist
Kollár, Attila
Siebenrock, Klaus Arno
Klenke, Frank Michael
author_sort Kurze, Christophe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic tumors are usually resected through the utilitarian pelvic incision, an extended ilioinguinal/iliofemoral approach. The pararectus approach, an intrapelvic anatomical approach with extraperitoneal access to the pelvis, has been established previously for the treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures. However, it has not been used to address pelvic tumors. The study aimed at investigating the feasibility of this approach for pelvic tumor surgery and the possibilities of combining this approach with standard approaches to the hip joint. METHODS: Thirteen patients that underwent pelvic tumor resections were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor resections were performed through the pararectus (n = 10) or extended pararectus approach (n = 3). In six of those cases, the pararectus approach was combined with extrapelvic approaches including the modified Gibson (n = 4), the Kocher-Langenbeck (n = 1), and the trochanteric flip approach (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 32.6 ± 9.1 months. RESULTS: In all cases, the tumor resections were carried out according to the preoperative plan. In seven of 13 cases, wide resections were performed; six of 13 cases were planned close resections. Four cases of major complications were observed (vascular injury, deep infection, iliac vein thrombosis, total hip arthroplasty dislocation). Minor complications were observed in two cases. One tumor recurred locally. At the final follow-up, 10 patients were alive, eight of those without evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the suitability of the pararectus approach for pelvic tumor resections. The possibility to combine the approach with standard approaches to the hip joint allowed for single-stage reconstructions of the pelvis and the hip joint without sacrificing surgical margins and function. The pararectus approach is a versatile option adding to the established approaches for musculoskeletal tumor surgery of the pelvis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6651940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66519402019-07-31 The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery Kurze, Christophe Keel, Marius Johann Baptist Kollár, Attila Siebenrock, Klaus Arno Klenke, Frank Michael J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Pelvic tumors are usually resected through the utilitarian pelvic incision, an extended ilioinguinal/iliofemoral approach. The pararectus approach, an intrapelvic anatomical approach with extraperitoneal access to the pelvis, has been established previously for the treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures. However, it has not been used to address pelvic tumors. The study aimed at investigating the feasibility of this approach for pelvic tumor surgery and the possibilities of combining this approach with standard approaches to the hip joint. METHODS: Thirteen patients that underwent pelvic tumor resections were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor resections were performed through the pararectus (n = 10) or extended pararectus approach (n = 3). In six of those cases, the pararectus approach was combined with extrapelvic approaches including the modified Gibson (n = 4), the Kocher-Langenbeck (n = 1), and the trochanteric flip approach (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 32.6 ± 9.1 months. RESULTS: In all cases, the tumor resections were carried out according to the preoperative plan. In seven of 13 cases, wide resections were performed; six of 13 cases were planned close resections. Four cases of major complications were observed (vascular injury, deep infection, iliac vein thrombosis, total hip arthroplasty dislocation). Minor complications were observed in two cases. One tumor recurred locally. At the final follow-up, 10 patients were alive, eight of those without evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the suitability of the pararectus approach for pelvic tumor resections. The possibility to combine the approach with standard approaches to the hip joint allowed for single-stage reconstructions of the pelvis and the hip joint without sacrificing surgical margins and function. The pararectus approach is a versatile option adding to the established approaches for musculoskeletal tumor surgery of the pelvis. BioMed Central 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6651940/ /pubmed/31337419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1275-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kurze, Christophe
Keel, Marius Johann Baptist
Kollár, Attila
Siebenrock, Klaus Arno
Klenke, Frank Michael
The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
title The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
title_full The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
title_fullStr The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
title_full_unstemmed The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
title_short The pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
title_sort pararectus approach—a versatile option in pelvic musculoskeletal tumor surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1275-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kurzechristophe thepararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT keelmariusjohannbaptist thepararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT kollarattila thepararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT siebenrockklausarno thepararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT klenkefrankmichael thepararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT kurzechristophe pararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT keelmariusjohannbaptist pararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT kollarattila pararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT siebenrockklausarno pararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery
AT klenkefrankmichael pararectusapproachaversatileoptioninpelvicmusculoskeletaltumorsurgery