Cargando…

Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis—a multicentre, retrospective, case-control study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this multicentre, retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches for treating thoracolumbar tuberculosis. METHODS: This study reviewed 132 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis in six institutions between January 1999 and Ja...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Yong, Wu, Wen-jie, Yang, Sen, Wang, Dong-Gui, Zhang, Qiang, Liu, Xun, Hou, Tian-Yong, Luo, Fei, Zhang, Ze-hua, Xu, Jian-zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1252-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this multicentre, retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches for treating thoracolumbar tuberculosis. METHODS: This study reviewed 132 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis in six institutions between January 1999 and January 2015 surgically treated by an anterior-only approach (n = 22, group A), an anterior combined with posterior approach (n = 79, group B), and a posterior-only approach (n = 31, group C). All patients were treated with standard antituberculosis drugs pre- and postoperatively and were followed regularly after surgery. Clinical symptoms, nerve function, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate were observed, and kyphosis correction and bone fusion were evaluated by X-ray or computed tomography. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, all patients had achieved bone fusion, relief from pain, and neurological recovery. The Cobb angle was improved; however, the Cobb angle showed a degree of loss at the final follow-up after all three surgical approaches. Further comparisons revealed a difference in angle loss at the final follow-up among the three groups; groups B and C were superior to group A in maintenance of the correction. The posterior-only approach was characterized by a shorter operative time and reduced blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery by a posterior-only approach is superior to that by an anterior-only approach and anterior combined with posterior approach in terms of permanent kyphosis correction and spinal stability maintenance. Therefore, we recommend surgery by a posterior-only approach as the optimized treatment for thoracolumbar tuberculosis if the indications for this treatment are met.