Cargando…

Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method

BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shenkin, Susan D., Fox, Christopher, Godfrey, Mary, Siddiqi, Najma, Goodacre, Steve, Young, John, Anand, Atul, Gray, Alasdair, Hanley, Janet, MacRaild, Allan, Steven, Jill, Black, Polly L., Tieges, Zoë, Boyd, Julia, Stephen, Jacqueline, Weir, Christopher J., MacLullich, Alasdair M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9
_version_ 1783438465940062208
author Shenkin, Susan D.
Fox, Christopher
Godfrey, Mary
Siddiqi, Najma
Goodacre, Steve
Young, John
Anand, Atul
Gray, Alasdair
Hanley, Janet
MacRaild, Allan
Steven, Jill
Black, Polly L.
Tieges, Zoë
Boyd, Julia
Stephen, Jacqueline
Weir, Christopher J.
MacLullich, Alasdair M. J.
author_facet Shenkin, Susan D.
Fox, Christopher
Godfrey, Mary
Siddiqi, Najma
Goodacre, Steve
Young, John
Anand, Atul
Gray, Alasdair
Hanley, Janet
MacRaild, Allan
Steven, Jill
Black, Polly L.
Tieges, Zoë
Boyd, Julia
Stephen, Jacqueline
Weir, Christopher J.
MacLullich, Alasdair M. J.
author_sort Shenkin, Susan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0–12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61–87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92–97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26–57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98–100%). CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093. Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6651960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66519602019-07-31 Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method Shenkin, Susan D. Fox, Christopher Godfrey, Mary Siddiqi, Najma Goodacre, Steve Young, John Anand, Atul Gray, Alasdair Hanley, Janet MacRaild, Allan Steven, Jill Black, Polly L. Tieges, Zoë Boyd, Julia Stephen, Jacqueline Weir, Christopher J. MacLullich, Alasdair M. J. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0–12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61–87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92–97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26–57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98–100%). CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093. Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6651960/ /pubmed/31337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shenkin, Susan D.
Fox, Christopher
Godfrey, Mary
Siddiqi, Najma
Goodacre, Steve
Young, John
Anand, Atul
Gray, Alasdair
Hanley, Janet
MacRaild, Allan
Steven, Jill
Black, Polly L.
Tieges, Zoë
Boyd, Julia
Stephen, Jacqueline
Weir, Christopher J.
MacLullich, Alasdair M. J.
Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
title Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
title_full Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
title_fullStr Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
title_full_unstemmed Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
title_short Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
title_sort delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4at and the confusion assessment method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9
work_keys_str_mv AT shenkinsusand deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT foxchristopher deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT godfreymary deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT siddiqinajma deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT goodacresteve deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT youngjohn deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT anandatul deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT grayalasdair deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT hanleyjanet deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT macraildallan deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT stevenjill deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT blackpollyl deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT tiegeszoe deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT boydjulia deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT stephenjacqueline deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT weirchristopherj deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod
AT maclullichalasdairmj deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod