Cargando…
Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9 |
_version_ | 1783438465940062208 |
---|---|
author | Shenkin, Susan D. Fox, Christopher Godfrey, Mary Siddiqi, Najma Goodacre, Steve Young, John Anand, Atul Gray, Alasdair Hanley, Janet MacRaild, Allan Steven, Jill Black, Polly L. Tieges, Zoë Boyd, Julia Stephen, Jacqueline Weir, Christopher J. MacLullich, Alasdair M. J. |
author_facet | Shenkin, Susan D. Fox, Christopher Godfrey, Mary Siddiqi, Najma Goodacre, Steve Young, John Anand, Atul Gray, Alasdair Hanley, Janet MacRaild, Allan Steven, Jill Black, Polly L. Tieges, Zoë Boyd, Julia Stephen, Jacqueline Weir, Christopher J. MacLullich, Alasdair M. J. |
author_sort | Shenkin, Susan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0–12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61–87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92–97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26–57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98–100%). CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093. Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6651960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66519602019-07-31 Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method Shenkin, Susan D. Fox, Christopher Godfrey, Mary Siddiqi, Najma Goodacre, Steve Young, John Anand, Atul Gray, Alasdair Hanley, Janet MacRaild, Allan Steven, Jill Black, Polly L. Tieges, Zoë Boyd, Julia Stephen, Jacqueline Weir, Christopher J. MacLullich, Alasdair M. J. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0–12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61–87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92–97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26–57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98–100%). CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093. Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6651960/ /pubmed/31337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shenkin, Susan D. Fox, Christopher Godfrey, Mary Siddiqi, Najma Goodacre, Steve Young, John Anand, Atul Gray, Alasdair Hanley, Janet MacRaild, Allan Steven, Jill Black, Polly L. Tieges, Zoë Boyd, Julia Stephen, Jacqueline Weir, Christopher J. MacLullich, Alasdair M. J. Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method |
title | Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method |
title_full | Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method |
title_fullStr | Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method |
title_full_unstemmed | Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method |
title_short | Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method |
title_sort | delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4at and the confusion assessment method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenkinsusand deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT foxchristopher deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT godfreymary deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT siddiqinajma deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT goodacresteve deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT youngjohn deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT anandatul deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT grayalasdair deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT hanleyjanet deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT macraildallan deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT stevenjill deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT blackpollyl deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT tiegeszoe deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT boydjulia deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT stephenjacqueline deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT weirchristopherj deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod AT maclullichalasdairmj deliriumdetectioninolderacutemedicalinpatientsamulticentreprospectivecomparativediagnostictestaccuracystudyofthe4atandtheconfusionassessmentmethod |