Cargando…
Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Early Health Technology Assessment (EHTA) is an evolving field in health policy which aims to provide decision support and mitigate risk during early medical device innovation. The clinician is a key stakeholder in this process and their role has traditionally been confined to assessing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9 |
_version_ | 1783438466397241344 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Vinayak Warty, Ritesh Nair, Amrish Krishnan, Sathya Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Vollenhoven, Beverley Wallace, Euan Morrison |
author_facet | Smith, Vinayak Warty, Ritesh Nair, Amrish Krishnan, Sathya Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Vollenhoven, Beverley Wallace, Euan Morrison |
author_sort | Smith, Vinayak |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early Health Technology Assessment (EHTA) is an evolving field in health policy which aims to provide decision support and mitigate risk during early medical device innovation. The clinician is a key stakeholder in this process and their role has traditionally been confined to assessing device efficacy and safety alone. There is however, no data exploring their role in this process and how they can contribute towards it. This motivated us to carry out a systematic review to delineate the role of the clinician in EHTA as per the PRISMA guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search of peer reviewed literature was undertaken across PUBMED, OVID Medline and Web of science up till June 2018. Studies that were suitable for inclusion focused on clinician input in health technology assessment or early medical device innovation. A qualitative approach was utilised to generate themes on how clinicians could contribute in general and specific areas of EHTA. Data was manually extracted by the authors and themes were agreed in consensus using a grounded theory framework. The specific stages included: All stages of EHTA, Basic research on mechanisms, Targeting for specific product, Proof of principle and Prototype and product development. Bias was assessed utilising the NICE Qualitative checklist. RESULTS: A total of 33 articles met the inclusion criteria for the review. Areas identified in which the clinicians could contribute to EHTA included: i) needs driven problem solving, ii) conformity assessment of MDs, iii) economic evaluation of MDs and iv) addressing the conflicts in interest. For clinicians’ input across the various specific areas of EHTA, an innovation framework was generated based on the subthemes extracted. CONCLUSIONS: The following review has identified the various segments in which clinicians can contribute to EHTA to inform stakeholders and has also proposed an innovation framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6651962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66519622019-07-31 Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review Smith, Vinayak Warty, Ritesh Nair, Amrish Krishnan, Sathya Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Vollenhoven, Beverley Wallace, Euan Morrison BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Early Health Technology Assessment (EHTA) is an evolving field in health policy which aims to provide decision support and mitigate risk during early medical device innovation. The clinician is a key stakeholder in this process and their role has traditionally been confined to assessing device efficacy and safety alone. There is however, no data exploring their role in this process and how they can contribute towards it. This motivated us to carry out a systematic review to delineate the role of the clinician in EHTA as per the PRISMA guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search of peer reviewed literature was undertaken across PUBMED, OVID Medline and Web of science up till June 2018. Studies that were suitable for inclusion focused on clinician input in health technology assessment or early medical device innovation. A qualitative approach was utilised to generate themes on how clinicians could contribute in general and specific areas of EHTA. Data was manually extracted by the authors and themes were agreed in consensus using a grounded theory framework. The specific stages included: All stages of EHTA, Basic research on mechanisms, Targeting for specific product, Proof of principle and Prototype and product development. Bias was assessed utilising the NICE Qualitative checklist. RESULTS: A total of 33 articles met the inclusion criteria for the review. Areas identified in which the clinicians could contribute to EHTA included: i) needs driven problem solving, ii) conformity assessment of MDs, iii) economic evaluation of MDs and iv) addressing the conflicts in interest. For clinicians’ input across the various specific areas of EHTA, an innovation framework was generated based on the subthemes extracted. CONCLUSIONS: The following review has identified the various segments in which clinicians can contribute to EHTA to inform stakeholders and has also proposed an innovation framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6651962/ /pubmed/31337393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smith, Vinayak Warty, Ritesh Nair, Amrish Krishnan, Sathya Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Vollenhoven, Beverley Wallace, Euan Morrison Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
title | Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
title_full | Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
title_short | Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
title_sort | defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation – a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithvinayak definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT wartyritesh definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT nairamrish definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT krishnansathya definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT sursasjoelarun definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT dasilvacostafabricio definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT vollenhovenbeverley definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview AT wallaceeuanmorrison definingthecliniciansroleinearlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringmedicaldeviceinnovationasystematicreview |