Cargando…
Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
BACKGROUND: Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4 |
_version_ | 1783438470171066368 |
---|---|
author | Rzanny, Michael Mäder, Patrick Deggelmann, Alice Chen, Minqian Wäldchen, Jana |
author_facet | Rzanny, Michael Mäder, Patrick Deggelmann, Alice Chen, Minqian Wäldchen, Jana |
author_sort | Rzanny, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allow for higher identification accuracy. RESULTS: We developed an image-capturing scheme to create observations of flowering plants. Each observation comprises five in-situ images of the same individual from predefined perspectives (entire plant, flower frontal- and lateral view, leaf top- and back side view). We collected a completely balanced dataset comprising 100 observations for each of 101 species with an emphasis on groups of conspecific and visually similar species including twelve Poaceae species. We used this dataset to train convolutional neural networks and determine the prediction accuracy for each single perspective and their combinations via score level fusion. Top-1 accuracies ranged between 77% (entire plant) and 97% (fusion of all perspectives) when averaged across species. Flower frontal view achieved the highest accuracy (88%). Fusing flower frontal, flower lateral and leaf top views yields the most reasonable compromise with respect to acquisition effort and accuracy (96%). The perspective achieving the highest accuracy was species dependent. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that image databases of herbaceous plants would benefit from multi organ observations, comprising at least the front and lateral perspective of flowers and the leaf top view. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6651978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66519782019-07-31 Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification Rzanny, Michael Mäder, Patrick Deggelmann, Alice Chen, Minqian Wäldchen, Jana Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allow for higher identification accuracy. RESULTS: We developed an image-capturing scheme to create observations of flowering plants. Each observation comprises five in-situ images of the same individual from predefined perspectives (entire plant, flower frontal- and lateral view, leaf top- and back side view). We collected a completely balanced dataset comprising 100 observations for each of 101 species with an emphasis on groups of conspecific and visually similar species including twelve Poaceae species. We used this dataset to train convolutional neural networks and determine the prediction accuracy for each single perspective and their combinations via score level fusion. Top-1 accuracies ranged between 77% (entire plant) and 97% (fusion of all perspectives) when averaged across species. Flower frontal view achieved the highest accuracy (88%). Fusing flower frontal, flower lateral and leaf top views yields the most reasonable compromise with respect to acquisition effort and accuracy (96%). The perspective achieving the highest accuracy was species dependent. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that image databases of herbaceous plants would benefit from multi organ observations, comprising at least the front and lateral perspective of flowers and the leaf top view. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6651978/ /pubmed/31367223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Rzanny, Michael Mäder, Patrick Deggelmann, Alice Chen, Minqian Wäldchen, Jana Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
title | Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
title_full | Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
title_fullStr | Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
title_full_unstemmed | Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
title_short | Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
title_sort | flowers, leaves or both? how to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rzannymichael flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification AT maderpatrick flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification AT deggelmannalice flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification AT chenminqian flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification AT waldchenjana flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification |