Cargando…

Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification

BACKGROUND: Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rzanny, Michael, Mäder, Patrick, Deggelmann, Alice, Chen, Minqian, Wäldchen, Jana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4
_version_ 1783438470171066368
author Rzanny, Michael
Mäder, Patrick
Deggelmann, Alice
Chen, Minqian
Wäldchen, Jana
author_facet Rzanny, Michael
Mäder, Patrick
Deggelmann, Alice
Chen, Minqian
Wäldchen, Jana
author_sort Rzanny, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allow for higher identification accuracy. RESULTS: We developed an image-capturing scheme to create observations of flowering plants. Each observation comprises five in-situ images of the same individual from predefined perspectives (entire plant, flower frontal- and lateral view, leaf top- and back side view). We collected a completely balanced dataset comprising 100 observations for each of 101 species with an emphasis on groups of conspecific and visually similar species including twelve Poaceae species. We used this dataset to train convolutional neural networks and determine the prediction accuracy for each single perspective and their combinations via score level fusion. Top-1 accuracies ranged between 77% (entire plant) and 97% (fusion of all perspectives) when averaged across species. Flower frontal view achieved the highest accuracy (88%). Fusing flower frontal, flower lateral and leaf top views yields the most reasonable compromise with respect to acquisition effort and accuracy (96%). The perspective achieving the highest accuracy was species dependent. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that image databases of herbaceous plants would benefit from multi organ observations, comprising at least the front and lateral perspective of flowers and the leaf top view. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6651978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66519782019-07-31 Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification Rzanny, Michael Mäder, Patrick Deggelmann, Alice Chen, Minqian Wäldchen, Jana Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allow for higher identification accuracy. RESULTS: We developed an image-capturing scheme to create observations of flowering plants. Each observation comprises five in-situ images of the same individual from predefined perspectives (entire plant, flower frontal- and lateral view, leaf top- and back side view). We collected a completely balanced dataset comprising 100 observations for each of 101 species with an emphasis on groups of conspecific and visually similar species including twelve Poaceae species. We used this dataset to train convolutional neural networks and determine the prediction accuracy for each single perspective and their combinations via score level fusion. Top-1 accuracies ranged between 77% (entire plant) and 97% (fusion of all perspectives) when averaged across species. Flower frontal view achieved the highest accuracy (88%). Fusing flower frontal, flower lateral and leaf top views yields the most reasonable compromise with respect to acquisition effort and accuracy (96%). The perspective achieving the highest accuracy was species dependent. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that image databases of herbaceous plants would benefit from multi organ observations, comprising at least the front and lateral perspective of flowers and the leaf top view. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6651978/ /pubmed/31367223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rzanny, Michael
Mäder, Patrick
Deggelmann, Alice
Chen, Minqian
Wäldchen, Jana
Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
title Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
title_full Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
title_fullStr Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
title_full_unstemmed Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
title_short Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
title_sort flowers, leaves or both? how to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rzannymichael flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification
AT maderpatrick flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification
AT deggelmannalice flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification
AT chenminqian flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification
AT waldchenjana flowersleavesorbothhowtoobtainsuitableimagesforautomatedplantidentification