Cargando…
Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
AIM: The aim is to compare and evaluate the different finishing and polishing systems for the change in surface roughness of resin composites and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct the study, 30 extracted human maxillary central incisors were selected, decoronated, and molded in self-cure acr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6652279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19 |
_version_ | 1783438526629543936 |
---|---|
author | Bansal, Karan Gupta, Sachin Nikhil, Vineeta Jaiswal, Shikha Jain, Akanksha Aggarwal, Neha |
author_facet | Bansal, Karan Gupta, Sachin Nikhil, Vineeta Jaiswal, Shikha Jain, Akanksha Aggarwal, Neha |
author_sort | Bansal, Karan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim is to compare and evaluate the different finishing and polishing systems for the change in surface roughness of resin composites and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct the study, 30 extracted human maxillary central incisors were selected, decoronated, and molded in self-cure acrylic molds. A box-shaped cavity of dimensions 3 mm × 3 mm × 2 mm was prepared in all the teeth. A nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250) was then used to restore the prepared cavities. Thirty samples were divided into two groups, control group (Group A, n = 10) and experimental group (Group B, n = 20). The samples in Group A were cured through the Mylar matrix. The experimental group, i.e., Group B was divided into two subgroups, i.e., Subgroup BX, n = 10 in which Sof-Lex polishing system was used for polishing the tooth surface and Subgroup BF, n = 10 in which Shofu composite polishing system was used. The mean surface roughness (Ra in μm) of the composite restoration as well as for the enamel surface of all the samples before and after polishing was measured with a contact profilometer, and the values were correlated with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The statistical analysis was carried out using paired t-test. The results exhibited a significant decrease in the surface roughness of the resin composite and enamel surface irrespective of the finishing and polishing system used. The mean surface roughness values demonstrated by Mylar matrix was the lowest followed by Sof-Lex polishing system. Shofu polishing system demonstrated the highest surface roughness values. CONCLUSION: Finishing and polishing of composite restoration can achieve a surface roughness similar to that of enamel. Involvement of marginal enamel in finishing and polishing procedures carried out for composite restoration results in smoother enamel surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6652279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66522792019-08-07 Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study Bansal, Karan Gupta, Sachin Nikhil, Vineeta Jaiswal, Shikha Jain, Akanksha Aggarwal, Neha Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article AIM: The aim is to compare and evaluate the different finishing and polishing systems for the change in surface roughness of resin composites and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct the study, 30 extracted human maxillary central incisors were selected, decoronated, and molded in self-cure acrylic molds. A box-shaped cavity of dimensions 3 mm × 3 mm × 2 mm was prepared in all the teeth. A nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250) was then used to restore the prepared cavities. Thirty samples were divided into two groups, control group (Group A, n = 10) and experimental group (Group B, n = 20). The samples in Group A were cured through the Mylar matrix. The experimental group, i.e., Group B was divided into two subgroups, i.e., Subgroup BX, n = 10 in which Sof-Lex polishing system was used for polishing the tooth surface and Subgroup BF, n = 10 in which Shofu composite polishing system was used. The mean surface roughness (Ra in μm) of the composite restoration as well as for the enamel surface of all the samples before and after polishing was measured with a contact profilometer, and the values were correlated with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The statistical analysis was carried out using paired t-test. The results exhibited a significant decrease in the surface roughness of the resin composite and enamel surface irrespective of the finishing and polishing system used. The mean surface roughness values demonstrated by Mylar matrix was the lowest followed by Sof-Lex polishing system. Shofu polishing system demonstrated the highest surface roughness values. CONCLUSION: Finishing and polishing of composite restoration can achieve a surface roughness similar to that of enamel. Involvement of marginal enamel in finishing and polishing procedures carried out for composite restoration results in smoother enamel surface. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6652279/ /pubmed/31392178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bansal, Karan Gupta, Sachin Nikhil, Vineeta Jaiswal, Shikha Jain, Akanksha Aggarwal, Neha Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study |
title | Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study |
title_full | Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study |
title_short | Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study |
title_sort | effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of resin composite and enamel: an in vitro profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6652279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bansalkaran effectofdifferentfinishingandpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofresincompositeandenamelaninvitroprofilometricandscanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT guptasachin effectofdifferentfinishingandpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofresincompositeandenamelaninvitroprofilometricandscanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT nikhilvineeta effectofdifferentfinishingandpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofresincompositeandenamelaninvitroprofilometricandscanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT jaiswalshikha effectofdifferentfinishingandpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofresincompositeandenamelaninvitroprofilometricandscanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT jainakanksha effectofdifferentfinishingandpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofresincompositeandenamelaninvitroprofilometricandscanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT aggarwalneha effectofdifferentfinishingandpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofresincompositeandenamelaninvitroprofilometricandscanningelectronmicroscopystudy |