Cargando…
A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tr...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0 |
_version_ | 1783438688575815680 |
---|---|
author | Polonioli, Andrea |
author_facet | Polonioli, Andrea |
author_sort | Polonioli, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tradition of systematic reviews of literature from scientific disciplines has been neglected in philosophy, systematic reviews are important tools that minimize bias in literature search and review and allow for greater reproducibility and transparency. If naturalistic philosophers wish to reduce bias in their research, they should then supplement their traditional tools for literature search and review by including systematic methodologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6656791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66567912019-08-09 A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy Polonioli, Andrea Synthese Article Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tradition of systematic reviews of literature from scientific disciplines has been neglected in philosophy, systematic reviews are important tools that minimize bias in literature search and review and allow for greater reproducibility and transparency. If naturalistic philosophers wish to reduce bias in their research, they should then supplement their traditional tools for literature search and review by including systematic methodologies. Springer Netherlands 2017-11-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6656791/ /pubmed/31404228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Polonioli, Andrea A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
title | A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
title_full | A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
title_fullStr | A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed | A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
title_short | A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
title_sort | plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polonioliandrea apleaforminimallybiasednaturalisticphilosophy AT polonioliandrea pleaforminimallybiasednaturalisticphilosophy |