Cargando…

A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy

Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Polonioli, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0
_version_ 1783438688575815680
author Polonioli, Andrea
author_facet Polonioli, Andrea
author_sort Polonioli, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tradition of systematic reviews of literature from scientific disciplines has been neglected in philosophy, systematic reviews are important tools that minimize bias in literature search and review and allow for greater reproducibility and transparency. If naturalistic philosophers wish to reduce bias in their research, they should then supplement their traditional tools for literature search and review by including systematic methodologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6656791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66567912019-08-09 A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy Polonioli, Andrea Synthese Article Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tradition of systematic reviews of literature from scientific disciplines has been neglected in philosophy, systematic reviews are important tools that minimize bias in literature search and review and allow for greater reproducibility and transparency. If naturalistic philosophers wish to reduce bias in their research, they should then supplement their traditional tools for literature search and review by including systematic methodologies. Springer Netherlands 2017-11-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6656791/ /pubmed/31404228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Polonioli, Andrea
A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
title A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
title_full A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
title_fullStr A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
title_full_unstemmed A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
title_short A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
title_sort plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0
work_keys_str_mv AT polonioliandrea apleaforminimallybiasednaturalisticphilosophy
AT polonioliandrea pleaforminimallybiasednaturalisticphilosophy