Cargando…
A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy
Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tr...
Autor principal: | Polonioli, Andrea |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1628-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy
por: Polonioli, Andrea
Publicado: (2016) -
Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: Current Standards and Recommendations for Future Practice
por: Polonioli, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment
por: Sargent, Rose-Mary
Publicado: (2009) -
Common Cognitive Biases in Nephrology Critical Care: A Plea for Metacognition
por: Singh, Gurkeerat, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Paediatric Femur Fractures: A Plea for Minimally Invasive Surgery to Prevent Osteomyelitis
por: Mansor, N, et al.
Publicado: (2018)