Cargando…
Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples
The role of the gut microbiome in critical illness is being actively investigated, but the optimal sampling methods for sequencing studies of gut microbiota remain unknown. Stool samples are generally considered the reference standard but are not practical to obtain in the intensive care unit (ICU),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00358-19 |
_version_ | 1783438701871759360 |
---|---|
author | Fair, Katherine Dunlap, Daniel G. Fitch, Adam Bogdanovich, Tatiana Methé, Barbara Morris, Alison McVerry, Bryan J. Kitsios, Georgios D. |
author_facet | Fair, Katherine Dunlap, Daniel G. Fitch, Adam Bogdanovich, Tatiana Methé, Barbara Morris, Alison McVerry, Bryan J. Kitsios, Georgios D. |
author_sort | Fair, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role of the gut microbiome in critical illness is being actively investigated, but the optimal sampling methods for sequencing studies of gut microbiota remain unknown. Stool samples are generally considered the reference standard but are not practical to obtain in the intensive care unit (ICU), and thus, rectal swabs are often used. However, the reliability of rectal swabs for gut microbiome profiling has not been established in the ICU setting. In this study, we compared 16S rRNA gene sequencing results between rectal swab and stool samples collected at three time points from mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Rectal swabs comprised 89% of the samples collected at the baseline time point, but stool samples became more extensively available at later time points. Significant differences in alpha-diversity and beta-diversity between rectal swabs and stool samples were observed, but these differences were primarily due to baseline samples. Higher relative abundances of members of the Actinobacteria phylum (typically skin microbes) were present in rectal swabs than in stool samples (P = 0.05), a difference that was attenuated over time. The progressively increasing similarity of rectal swabs and stool samples likely resulted from increasing levels of stool coating of the rectal vault and direct soiling of the rectal swabs taken at later time points. Therefore, inferences about the role of the gut microbiome in critical illness should be drawn cautiously and should take into account the type and timing of samples analyzed. IMPORTANCE Rectal swabs have been proposed as potential alternatives to stool samples for gut microbiome profiling in outpatients or healthy adults, but their reliability in assessment of critically ill patients has not been defined. Because stool sampling is not practical and often not feasible in the intensive care unit, we performed a detailed comparison of gut microbial sequencing profiles between rectal swabs and stool samples in a longitudinal cohort of critically ill patients. We identified systematic differences in gut microbial profiles between rectal swabs and stool samples and demonstrated that the timing of the rectal swab sampling had a significant impact on sequencing results. Our methodological findings should provide valuable information for the design and interpretation of future investigations of the role of the gut microbiome in critical illness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6656869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66568692019-07-29 Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples Fair, Katherine Dunlap, Daniel G. Fitch, Adam Bogdanovich, Tatiana Methé, Barbara Morris, Alison McVerry, Bryan J. Kitsios, Georgios D. mSphere Observation The role of the gut microbiome in critical illness is being actively investigated, but the optimal sampling methods for sequencing studies of gut microbiota remain unknown. Stool samples are generally considered the reference standard but are not practical to obtain in the intensive care unit (ICU), and thus, rectal swabs are often used. However, the reliability of rectal swabs for gut microbiome profiling has not been established in the ICU setting. In this study, we compared 16S rRNA gene sequencing results between rectal swab and stool samples collected at three time points from mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Rectal swabs comprised 89% of the samples collected at the baseline time point, but stool samples became more extensively available at later time points. Significant differences in alpha-diversity and beta-diversity between rectal swabs and stool samples were observed, but these differences were primarily due to baseline samples. Higher relative abundances of members of the Actinobacteria phylum (typically skin microbes) were present in rectal swabs than in stool samples (P = 0.05), a difference that was attenuated over time. The progressively increasing similarity of rectal swabs and stool samples likely resulted from increasing levels of stool coating of the rectal vault and direct soiling of the rectal swabs taken at later time points. Therefore, inferences about the role of the gut microbiome in critical illness should be drawn cautiously and should take into account the type and timing of samples analyzed. IMPORTANCE Rectal swabs have been proposed as potential alternatives to stool samples for gut microbiome profiling in outpatients or healthy adults, but their reliability in assessment of critically ill patients has not been defined. Because stool sampling is not practical and often not feasible in the intensive care unit, we performed a detailed comparison of gut microbial sequencing profiles between rectal swabs and stool samples in a longitudinal cohort of critically ill patients. We identified systematic differences in gut microbial profiles between rectal swabs and stool samples and demonstrated that the timing of the rectal swab sampling had a significant impact on sequencing results. Our methodological findings should provide valuable information for the design and interpretation of future investigations of the role of the gut microbiome in critical illness. American Society for Microbiology 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6656869/ /pubmed/31341070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00358-19 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fair et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Observation Fair, Katherine Dunlap, Daniel G. Fitch, Adam Bogdanovich, Tatiana Methé, Barbara Morris, Alison McVerry, Bryan J. Kitsios, Georgios D. Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples |
title | Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples |
title_full | Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples |
title_fullStr | Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples |
title_short | Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples |
title_sort | rectal swabs from critically ill patients provide discordant representations of the gut microbiome compared to stool samples |
topic | Observation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6656869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00358-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fairkatherine rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT dunlapdanielg rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT fitchadam rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT bogdanovichtatiana rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT methebarbara rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT morrisalison rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT mcverrybryanj rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples AT kitsiosgeorgiosd rectalswabsfromcriticallyillpatientsprovidediscordantrepresentationsofthegutmicrobiomecomparedtostoolsamples |