Cargando…
A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
BACKGROUND: Improving upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke represents a major clinical and scientific goal. We aim to complete three systematic reviews to estimate the (1) association between time to start of UL therapy and motor recovery, (2) relative efficacy of different UL therapy approac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6 |
_version_ | 1783438730084745216 |
---|---|
author | Hayward, Kathryn S. Kramer, Sharon F. Thijs, Vincent Ratcliffe, Julie Ward, Nick S. Churilov, Leonid Jolliffe, Laura Corbett, Dale Cloud, Geoffrey Kaffenberger, Tina Brodtmann, Amy Bernhardt, Julie Lannin, Natasha A. |
author_facet | Hayward, Kathryn S. Kramer, Sharon F. Thijs, Vincent Ratcliffe, Julie Ward, Nick S. Churilov, Leonid Jolliffe, Laura Corbett, Dale Cloud, Geoffrey Kaffenberger, Tina Brodtmann, Amy Bernhardt, Julie Lannin, Natasha A. |
author_sort | Hayward, Kathryn S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke represents a major clinical and scientific goal. We aim to complete three systematic reviews to estimate the (1) association between time to start of UL therapy and motor recovery, (2) relative efficacy of different UL therapy approaches post-stroke and (3) cost-effectiveness of UL therapy interventions. METHODS: We have designed a systematic review protocol to address three systematic review questions that were each registered with PROSPERO. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. We will include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised clinical trials, before-after studies and observational studies of adult stroke survivors with an average stroke onset < 6 months, undergoing hospital-based therapy to improve UL function. Eligible interventions will aim to promote UL functional recovery. Two reviewers will independently screen, select and extract data. Study risk of bias will be appraised using appropriate tools. Clinical measures of motor recovery will be investigated (primary measure Fugl Meyer UL assessment), as well as measures of health-related quality of life (primary measure EQ-5D) and all cost-effectiveness analyses completed. Secondary outcomes include therapy dose (minutes, weeks, repetitions as available) and safety (i.e. adverse events, serious adverse events). A narrative synthesis will describe quality and content of the evidence. If feasible, we will conduct random effects meta-analyses where appropriate. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the findings of this review will increase our understanding of UL therapy and inform the generation of novel, data-driven hypotheses for future UL therapy research post-stroke. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018019367, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111629, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111628. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6657039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66570392019-07-31 A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke Hayward, Kathryn S. Kramer, Sharon F. Thijs, Vincent Ratcliffe, Julie Ward, Nick S. Churilov, Leonid Jolliffe, Laura Corbett, Dale Cloud, Geoffrey Kaffenberger, Tina Brodtmann, Amy Bernhardt, Julie Lannin, Natasha A. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Improving upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke represents a major clinical and scientific goal. We aim to complete three systematic reviews to estimate the (1) association between time to start of UL therapy and motor recovery, (2) relative efficacy of different UL therapy approaches post-stroke and (3) cost-effectiveness of UL therapy interventions. METHODS: We have designed a systematic review protocol to address three systematic review questions that were each registered with PROSPERO. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. We will include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised clinical trials, before-after studies and observational studies of adult stroke survivors with an average stroke onset < 6 months, undergoing hospital-based therapy to improve UL function. Eligible interventions will aim to promote UL functional recovery. Two reviewers will independently screen, select and extract data. Study risk of bias will be appraised using appropriate tools. Clinical measures of motor recovery will be investigated (primary measure Fugl Meyer UL assessment), as well as measures of health-related quality of life (primary measure EQ-5D) and all cost-effectiveness analyses completed. Secondary outcomes include therapy dose (minutes, weeks, repetitions as available) and safety (i.e. adverse events, serious adverse events). A narrative synthesis will describe quality and content of the evidence. If feasible, we will conduct random effects meta-analyses where appropriate. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the findings of this review will increase our understanding of UL therapy and inform the generation of novel, data-driven hypotheses for future UL therapy research post-stroke. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018019367, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111629, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111628. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6657039/ /pubmed/31345263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Hayward, Kathryn S. Kramer, Sharon F. Thijs, Vincent Ratcliffe, Julie Ward, Nick S. Churilov, Leonid Jolliffe, Laura Corbett, Dale Cloud, Geoffrey Kaffenberger, Tina Brodtmann, Amy Bernhardt, Julie Lannin, Natasha A. A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
title | A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
title_full | A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
title_fullStr | A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
title_short | A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
title_sort | systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haywardkathryns asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT kramersharonf asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT thijsvincent asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT ratcliffejulie asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT wardnicks asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT churilovleonid asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT jolliffelaura asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT corbettdale asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT cloudgeoffrey asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT kaffenbergertina asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT brodtmannamy asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT bernhardtjulie asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT lanninnatashaa asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT haywardkathryns systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT kramersharonf systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT thijsvincent systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT ratcliffejulie systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT wardnicks systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT churilovleonid systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT jolliffelaura systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT corbettdale systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT cloudgeoffrey systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT kaffenbergertina systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT brodtmannamy systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT bernhardtjulie systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke AT lanninnatashaa systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke |