Cargando…

A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke

BACKGROUND: Improving upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke represents a major clinical and scientific goal. We aim to complete three systematic reviews to estimate the (1) association between time to start of UL therapy and motor recovery, (2) relative efficacy of different UL therapy approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayward, Kathryn S., Kramer, Sharon F., Thijs, Vincent, Ratcliffe, Julie, Ward, Nick S., Churilov, Leonid, Jolliffe, Laura, Corbett, Dale, Cloud, Geoffrey, Kaffenberger, Tina, Brodtmann, Amy, Bernhardt, Julie, Lannin, Natasha A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6
_version_ 1783438730084745216
author Hayward, Kathryn S.
Kramer, Sharon F.
Thijs, Vincent
Ratcliffe, Julie
Ward, Nick S.
Churilov, Leonid
Jolliffe, Laura
Corbett, Dale
Cloud, Geoffrey
Kaffenberger, Tina
Brodtmann, Amy
Bernhardt, Julie
Lannin, Natasha A.
author_facet Hayward, Kathryn S.
Kramer, Sharon F.
Thijs, Vincent
Ratcliffe, Julie
Ward, Nick S.
Churilov, Leonid
Jolliffe, Laura
Corbett, Dale
Cloud, Geoffrey
Kaffenberger, Tina
Brodtmann, Amy
Bernhardt, Julie
Lannin, Natasha A.
author_sort Hayward, Kathryn S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke represents a major clinical and scientific goal. We aim to complete three systematic reviews to estimate the (1) association between time to start of UL therapy and motor recovery, (2) relative efficacy of different UL therapy approaches post-stroke and (3) cost-effectiveness of UL therapy interventions. METHODS: We have designed a systematic review protocol to address three systematic review questions that were each registered with PROSPERO. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. We will include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised clinical trials, before-after studies and observational studies of adult stroke survivors with an average stroke onset < 6 months, undergoing hospital-based therapy to improve UL function. Eligible interventions will aim to promote UL functional recovery. Two reviewers will independently screen, select and extract data. Study risk of bias will be appraised using appropriate tools. Clinical measures of motor recovery will be investigated (primary measure Fugl Meyer UL assessment), as well as measures of health-related quality of life (primary measure EQ-5D) and all cost-effectiveness analyses completed. Secondary outcomes include therapy dose (minutes, weeks, repetitions as available) and safety (i.e. adverse events, serious adverse events). A narrative synthesis will describe quality and content of the evidence. If feasible, we will conduct random effects meta-analyses where appropriate. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the findings of this review will increase our understanding of UL therapy and inform the generation of novel, data-driven hypotheses for future UL therapy research post-stroke. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018019367, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111629, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111628. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6657039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66570392019-07-31 A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke Hayward, Kathryn S. Kramer, Sharon F. Thijs, Vincent Ratcliffe, Julie Ward, Nick S. Churilov, Leonid Jolliffe, Laura Corbett, Dale Cloud, Geoffrey Kaffenberger, Tina Brodtmann, Amy Bernhardt, Julie Lannin, Natasha A. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Improving upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke represents a major clinical and scientific goal. We aim to complete three systematic reviews to estimate the (1) association between time to start of UL therapy and motor recovery, (2) relative efficacy of different UL therapy approaches post-stroke and (3) cost-effectiveness of UL therapy interventions. METHODS: We have designed a systematic review protocol to address three systematic review questions that were each registered with PROSPERO. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. We will include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised clinical trials, before-after studies and observational studies of adult stroke survivors with an average stroke onset < 6 months, undergoing hospital-based therapy to improve UL function. Eligible interventions will aim to promote UL functional recovery. Two reviewers will independently screen, select and extract data. Study risk of bias will be appraised using appropriate tools. Clinical measures of motor recovery will be investigated (primary measure Fugl Meyer UL assessment), as well as measures of health-related quality of life (primary measure EQ-5D) and all cost-effectiveness analyses completed. Secondary outcomes include therapy dose (minutes, weeks, repetitions as available) and safety (i.e. adverse events, serious adverse events). A narrative synthesis will describe quality and content of the evidence. If feasible, we will conduct random effects meta-analyses where appropriate. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the findings of this review will increase our understanding of UL therapy and inform the generation of novel, data-driven hypotheses for future UL therapy research post-stroke. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018019367, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111629, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018111628. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6657039/ /pubmed/31345263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Hayward, Kathryn S.
Kramer, Sharon F.
Thijs, Vincent
Ratcliffe, Julie
Ward, Nick S.
Churilov, Leonid
Jolliffe, Laura
Corbett, Dale
Cloud, Geoffrey
Kaffenberger, Tina
Brodtmann, Amy
Bernhardt, Julie
Lannin, Natasha A.
A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
title A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
title_full A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
title_fullStr A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
title_short A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
title_sort systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6
work_keys_str_mv AT haywardkathryns asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT kramersharonf asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT thijsvincent asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT ratcliffejulie asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT wardnicks asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT churilovleonid asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT jolliffelaura asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT corbettdale asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT cloudgeoffrey asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT kaffenbergertina asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT brodtmannamy asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT bernhardtjulie asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT lanninnatashaa asystematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT haywardkathryns systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT kramersharonf systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT thijsvincent systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT ratcliffejulie systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT wardnicks systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT churilovleonid systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT jolliffelaura systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT corbettdale systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT cloudgeoffrey systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT kaffenbergertina systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT brodtmannamy systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT bernhardtjulie systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT lanninnatashaa systematicreviewprotocoloftimingefficacyandcosteffectivenessofupperlimbtherapyformotorrecoverypoststroke