Cargando…
Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices
BACKGROUND: Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) is a study of external support strategies to build quality improvement (QI) capacity in primary care with a focus on cardiovascular risk factors: appropriate aspirin use, blood pressure control, and tobacco screening/cessation. METHODS: To guide practice fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1000-1 |
_version_ | 1783438738131517440 |
---|---|
author | Parchman, Michael L. Anderson, Melissa L. Coleman, Katie Michaels, Le Ann Schuttner, Linnaea Conway, Cullen Hsu, Clarissa Fagnan, Lyle J. |
author_facet | Parchman, Michael L. Anderson, Melissa L. Coleman, Katie Michaels, Le Ann Schuttner, Linnaea Conway, Cullen Hsu, Clarissa Fagnan, Lyle J. |
author_sort | Parchman, Michael L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) is a study of external support strategies to build quality improvement (QI) capacity in primary care with a focus on cardiovascular risk factors: appropriate aspirin use, blood pressure control, and tobacco screening/cessation. METHODS: To guide practice facilitator support, experts in practice transformation identified seven domains of QI capacity and mapped items from a previously validated medical home assessment tool to them. A practice facilitator (PF) met with clinicians and staff in each practice to discuss each item on the Quality Improvement Capacity Assessment (QICA) resulting in a practice-level response to each item. We examined the association between the QICA total and sub-scale scores, practice characteristics, a measure of prior experience with managing practice change, and performance on clinical quality measures (CQMs) for the three cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: The QICA score was associated with prior experience managing change and moderately associated with two of the three CQMs: aspirin use (r = 0.16, p = 0.049) and blood pressure control (r = 0.18, p = 0.013). Rural practices and those with 2–5 clinicians had lower QICA scores.. CONCLUSIONS: The QICA is useful for assessing QI capacity within a practice and may serve as a guide for both facilitators and primary care practices in efforts to build this capacity and improve measures of clinical quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier# NCT02839382, retrospectively registered on July 21, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-1000-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6657073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66570732019-07-31 Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices Parchman, Michael L. Anderson, Melissa L. Coleman, Katie Michaels, Le Ann Schuttner, Linnaea Conway, Cullen Hsu, Clarissa Fagnan, Lyle J. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) is a study of external support strategies to build quality improvement (QI) capacity in primary care with a focus on cardiovascular risk factors: appropriate aspirin use, blood pressure control, and tobacco screening/cessation. METHODS: To guide practice facilitator support, experts in practice transformation identified seven domains of QI capacity and mapped items from a previously validated medical home assessment tool to them. A practice facilitator (PF) met with clinicians and staff in each practice to discuss each item on the Quality Improvement Capacity Assessment (QICA) resulting in a practice-level response to each item. We examined the association between the QICA total and sub-scale scores, practice characteristics, a measure of prior experience with managing practice change, and performance on clinical quality measures (CQMs) for the three cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: The QICA score was associated with prior experience managing change and moderately associated with two of the three CQMs: aspirin use (r = 0.16, p = 0.049) and blood pressure control (r = 0.18, p = 0.013). Rural practices and those with 2–5 clinicians had lower QICA scores.. CONCLUSIONS: The QICA is useful for assessing QI capacity within a practice and may serve as a guide for both facilitators and primary care practices in efforts to build this capacity and improve measures of clinical quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier# NCT02839382, retrospectively registered on July 21, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-1000-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6657073/ /pubmed/31345167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1000-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parchman, Michael L. Anderson, Melissa L. Coleman, Katie Michaels, Le Ann Schuttner, Linnaea Conway, Cullen Hsu, Clarissa Fagnan, Lyle J. Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
title | Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
title_full | Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
title_fullStr | Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
title_short | Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
title_sort | assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1000-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parchmanmichaell assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT andersonmelissal assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT colemankatie assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT michaelsleann assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT schuttnerlinnaea assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT conwaycullen assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT hsuclarissa assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices AT fagnanlylej assessingqualityimprovementcapacityinprimarycarepractices |