Cargando…
In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided pulsed focused ultrasound combined with the infusion of microbubbles (pFUS+MB) induces transient blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) in targeted regions. pFUS+MB, through the facilitation of neurotherapeutics’ delivery, has been advocated as an adju...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1543-z |
_version_ | 1783438742716940288 |
---|---|
author | Sinharay, Sanhita Tu, Tsang-Wei Kovacs, Zsofia I. Schreiber-Stainthorp, William Sundby, Maggie Zhang, Xiang Papadakis, Georgios Z. Reid, William C. Frank, Joseph A. Hammoud, Dima A. |
author_facet | Sinharay, Sanhita Tu, Tsang-Wei Kovacs, Zsofia I. Schreiber-Stainthorp, William Sundby, Maggie Zhang, Xiang Papadakis, Georgios Z. Reid, William C. Frank, Joseph A. Hammoud, Dima A. |
author_sort | Sinharay, Sanhita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided pulsed focused ultrasound combined with the infusion of microbubbles (pFUS+MB) induces transient blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) in targeted regions. pFUS+MB, through the facilitation of neurotherapeutics’ delivery, has been advocated as an adjuvant treatment for neurodegenerative diseases and malignancies. Sterile neuroinflammation has been recently described following pFUS+MB BBBO. In this study, we used PET imaging with [18F]-DPA714, a biomarker of translocator protein (TSPO), to assess for neuroinflammatory changes following single and multiple pFUS+MB sessions. METHODS: Three groups of Sprague-Dawley female rats received MRI-guided pFUS+MB (Optison™; 5–8 × 10(7) MB/rat) treatments to the left frontal cortex and right hippocampus. Group A rats were sonicated once. Group B rats were sonicated twice and group C rats were sonicated six times on weekly basis. Passive cavitation detection feedback (PCD) controlled the peak negative pressure during sonication. We performed T1-weighted scans immediately after sonication to assess efficiency of BBBO and T2*-weighted scans to evaluate for hypointense voxels. [18F]DPA-714 PET/CT scans were acquired after the BBB had closed, 24 h after sonication in group A and within an average of 10 days from the last sonication in groups B and C. Ratios of T1 enhancement, T2* values, and [18F]DPA-714 percent injected dose/cc (%ID/cc) values in the targeted areas to the contralateral brain were calculated. Histological assessment for microglial activation/astrocytosis was performed. RESULTS: In all groups, [18F]DPA-714 binding was increased at the sonicated compared to non-sonicated brain (%ID/cc ratios > 1). Immunohistopathology showed increased staining for microglial and astrocytic markers in the sonicated frontal cortex compared to contralateral brain and to a lesser extent in the sonicated hippocampus. Using MRI, we documented BBB disruption immediately after sonication with resolution of BBBO 24 h later. We found more T2* hypointense voxels with increasing number of sonications. In a longitudinal group of animals imaged after two and after six sonications, there was no cumulative increase of neuroinflammation on PET. CONCLUSION: Using [18F]DPA-714 PET, we documented in vivo neuroinflammatory changes in association with pFUS+MB. Our protocol (utilizing PCD feedback to minimize damage) resulted in neuroinflammation visualized 24 h post one sonication. Our findings were supported by immunohistochemistry showing microglial activation and astrocytosis. Experimental sonication parameters intended for BBB disruption should be evaluated for neuroinflammatory sequelae prior to implementation in clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-019-1543-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6657093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66570932019-07-31 In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study Sinharay, Sanhita Tu, Tsang-Wei Kovacs, Zsofia I. Schreiber-Stainthorp, William Sundby, Maggie Zhang, Xiang Papadakis, Georgios Z. Reid, William C. Frank, Joseph A. Hammoud, Dima A. J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided pulsed focused ultrasound combined with the infusion of microbubbles (pFUS+MB) induces transient blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) in targeted regions. pFUS+MB, through the facilitation of neurotherapeutics’ delivery, has been advocated as an adjuvant treatment for neurodegenerative diseases and malignancies. Sterile neuroinflammation has been recently described following pFUS+MB BBBO. In this study, we used PET imaging with [18F]-DPA714, a biomarker of translocator protein (TSPO), to assess for neuroinflammatory changes following single and multiple pFUS+MB sessions. METHODS: Three groups of Sprague-Dawley female rats received MRI-guided pFUS+MB (Optison™; 5–8 × 10(7) MB/rat) treatments to the left frontal cortex and right hippocampus. Group A rats were sonicated once. Group B rats were sonicated twice and group C rats were sonicated six times on weekly basis. Passive cavitation detection feedback (PCD) controlled the peak negative pressure during sonication. We performed T1-weighted scans immediately after sonication to assess efficiency of BBBO and T2*-weighted scans to evaluate for hypointense voxels. [18F]DPA-714 PET/CT scans were acquired after the BBB had closed, 24 h after sonication in group A and within an average of 10 days from the last sonication in groups B and C. Ratios of T1 enhancement, T2* values, and [18F]DPA-714 percent injected dose/cc (%ID/cc) values in the targeted areas to the contralateral brain were calculated. Histological assessment for microglial activation/astrocytosis was performed. RESULTS: In all groups, [18F]DPA-714 binding was increased at the sonicated compared to non-sonicated brain (%ID/cc ratios > 1). Immunohistopathology showed increased staining for microglial and astrocytic markers in the sonicated frontal cortex compared to contralateral brain and to a lesser extent in the sonicated hippocampus. Using MRI, we documented BBB disruption immediately after sonication with resolution of BBBO 24 h later. We found more T2* hypointense voxels with increasing number of sonications. In a longitudinal group of animals imaged after two and after six sonications, there was no cumulative increase of neuroinflammation on PET. CONCLUSION: Using [18F]DPA-714 PET, we documented in vivo neuroinflammatory changes in association with pFUS+MB. Our protocol (utilizing PCD feedback to minimize damage) resulted in neuroinflammation visualized 24 h post one sonication. Our findings were supported by immunohistochemistry showing microglial activation and astrocytosis. Experimental sonication parameters intended for BBB disruption should be evaluated for neuroinflammatory sequelae prior to implementation in clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-019-1543-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6657093/ /pubmed/31345243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1543-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sinharay, Sanhita Tu, Tsang-Wei Kovacs, Zsofia I. Schreiber-Stainthorp, William Sundby, Maggie Zhang, Xiang Papadakis, Georgios Z. Reid, William C. Frank, Joseph A. Hammoud, Dima A. In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study |
title | In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study |
title_full | In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study |
title_fullStr | In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study |
title_full_unstemmed | In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study |
title_short | In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study |
title_sort | in vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18f]dpa-714 pet study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1543-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinharaysanhita invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT tutsangwei invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT kovacszsofiai invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT schreiberstainthorpwilliam invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT sundbymaggie invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT zhangxiang invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT papadakisgeorgiosz invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT reidwilliamc invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT frankjosepha invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy AT hammouddimaa invivoimagingofsterilemicroglialactivationinratbrainafterdisruptingthebloodbrainbarrierwithpulsedfocusedultrasound18fdpa714petstudy |