Cargando…

Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark

BACKGROUND: End-of-life (EOL) conversations in hospital should serve to give patients the opportunity to consider future treatment options and help them clarify their values and wishes before it becomes relevant to make decisions about treatment. However, it is known that EOL conversations are not p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergenholtz, Heidi, Timm, Helle Ussing, Missel, Malene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0448-z
_version_ 1783438754538586112
author Bergenholtz, Heidi
Timm, Helle Ussing
Missel, Malene
author_facet Bergenholtz, Heidi
Timm, Helle Ussing
Missel, Malene
author_sort Bergenholtz, Heidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: End-of-life (EOL) conversations in hospital should serve to give patients the opportunity to consider future treatment options and help them clarify their values and wishes before it becomes relevant to make decisions about treatment. However, it is known that EOL conversations are not performed systematically in hospital. This may mean that patients and their relatives do not address EOL issues. There is a lack of knowledge about who is responsible for conducting these conversations, and when and under what circumstances they are conducted. The aim of this study was to explore the existing practices regarding EOL conversations in an acute care hospital setting. METHODS: The design was Interpretive Description and the methods for the data collection included: 1. Participatory observational studies in a pulmonary medical and surgical ward (a total of 66 h); 2. Four focus group interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 14) from the wards. The analysis followed Spradley’s ethnosemantic analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed three cultural categories related to: 1. The physical and organizational setting; 2. The timing of EOL conversations and competencies and roles in addressing EOL issues and 3. Topics addressed in EOL conversations. The EOL conversations were part of daily clinical practice, but there was a lack of competencies, roles were unclear and the physical and organizational environment was not conducive to the conversations. The topics of the EOL conversations revolved around a “here-and-now” status of the patient’s disease progression and decisions about the level of treatment. To a lesser extent, the conversations included the patient’s and relatives’ thoughts and wishes concerning EOL, which allowed long-term care planning. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there are several barriers to talking about EOL in an acute care hospital setting, and future strategies must address an overall approach. In order to provide patients and their relatives with better opportunities to express their EOL wishes, there is a need for clearer roles and guidelines in an interdisciplinary approach to EOL conversations, alongside improved staff competencies and changes to the organizational and physical environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6657144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66571442019-07-31 Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark Bergenholtz, Heidi Timm, Helle Ussing Missel, Malene BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: End-of-life (EOL) conversations in hospital should serve to give patients the opportunity to consider future treatment options and help them clarify their values and wishes before it becomes relevant to make decisions about treatment. However, it is known that EOL conversations are not performed systematically in hospital. This may mean that patients and their relatives do not address EOL issues. There is a lack of knowledge about who is responsible for conducting these conversations, and when and under what circumstances they are conducted. The aim of this study was to explore the existing practices regarding EOL conversations in an acute care hospital setting. METHODS: The design was Interpretive Description and the methods for the data collection included: 1. Participatory observational studies in a pulmonary medical and surgical ward (a total of 66 h); 2. Four focus group interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 14) from the wards. The analysis followed Spradley’s ethnosemantic analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed three cultural categories related to: 1. The physical and organizational setting; 2. The timing of EOL conversations and competencies and roles in addressing EOL issues and 3. Topics addressed in EOL conversations. The EOL conversations were part of daily clinical practice, but there was a lack of competencies, roles were unclear and the physical and organizational environment was not conducive to the conversations. The topics of the EOL conversations revolved around a “here-and-now” status of the patient’s disease progression and decisions about the level of treatment. To a lesser extent, the conversations included the patient’s and relatives’ thoughts and wishes concerning EOL, which allowed long-term care planning. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there are several barriers to talking about EOL in an acute care hospital setting, and future strategies must address an overall approach. In order to provide patients and their relatives with better opportunities to express their EOL wishes, there is a need for clearer roles and guidelines in an interdisciplinary approach to EOL conversations, alongside improved staff competencies and changes to the organizational and physical environment. BioMed Central 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6657144/ /pubmed/31345196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0448-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bergenholtz, Heidi
Timm, Helle Ussing
Missel, Malene
Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark
title Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark
title_full Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark
title_fullStr Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark
title_short Talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark
title_sort talking about end of life in general palliative care – what’s going on? a qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in denmark
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0448-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bergenholtzheidi talkingaboutendoflifeingeneralpalliativecarewhatsgoingonaqualitativestudyonendoflifeconversationsinanacutecarehospitalindenmark
AT timmhelleussing talkingaboutendoflifeingeneralpalliativecarewhatsgoingonaqualitativestudyonendoflifeconversationsinanacutecarehospitalindenmark
AT misselmalene talkingaboutendoflifeingeneralpalliativecarewhatsgoingonaqualitativestudyonendoflifeconversationsinanacutecarehospitalindenmark