Cargando…

Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Forty per cent of critically ill patients are affected by intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), to which skeletal muscle wasting makes a substantial contribution. This can impair outcomes in hospital, and can cause long-term physical disability after hospital discharge. No effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chhetri, Ismita, Hunt, Julie E. A., Mendis, Jeewaka R., Patterson, Stephen D., Puthucheary, Zudin A., Montgomery, Hugh E., Creagh-Brown, Benedict C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5
_version_ 1783438761793683456
author Chhetri, Ismita
Hunt, Julie E. A.
Mendis, Jeewaka R.
Patterson, Stephen D.
Puthucheary, Zudin A.
Montgomery, Hugh E.
Creagh-Brown, Benedict C.
author_facet Chhetri, Ismita
Hunt, Julie E. A.
Mendis, Jeewaka R.
Patterson, Stephen D.
Puthucheary, Zudin A.
Montgomery, Hugh E.
Creagh-Brown, Benedict C.
author_sort Chhetri, Ismita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Forty per cent of critically ill patients are affected by intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), to which skeletal muscle wasting makes a substantial contribution. This can impair outcomes in hospital, and can cause long-term physical disability after hospital discharge. No effective mitigating strategies have yet been identified. Application of a repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) a limb pressure cuff inducing brief repeated cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion, can limit disuse muscle atrophy in both healthy controls and bed-bound patients recovering from knee surgery. We wish to determine whether RVOS might be effective in mitigating against muscle wasting in the ICU. Given that RVOS can also improve vascular function in healthy controls, we also wish to assess such effects in the critically ill. We here describe a pilot study to assess whether RVOS application is safe, tolerable, feasible and acceptable for ICU patients. METHODS: This is a randomised interventional feasibility trial. Thirty-two ventilated adult ICU patients with multiorgan failure will be recruited within 48 h of admission and randomised to either the intervention arm or the control arm. Intervention participants will receive RVOS twice daily (except only once on day 1) for up to 10 days or until ICU discharge. Serious adverse events and tolerability (pain score) will be recorded; feasibility of trial procedures will be assessed against pre-specified criteria and acceptability by semi-structured interview. Together with vascular function, muscle mass and quality will be assessed using ultrasound and measures of physical function at baseline, on days 6 and 11 of study enrolment, and at ICU and hospital discharge. Blood and urine biomarkers of muscle metabolism, vascular function, inflammation and DNA damage/repair mechanism will also be analysed. The Health questionnaire will be completed 3 months after hospital discharge. DISCUSSION: If this study demonstrates feasibility, the derived data will be used to inform the design (and sample size) of an appropriately-powered prospective trial to clarify whether RVOS can help preserve muscle mass/improve vascular function in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN44340629. Registered on 26 October 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6657179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66571792019-07-31 Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial Chhetri, Ismita Hunt, Julie E. A. Mendis, Jeewaka R. Patterson, Stephen D. Puthucheary, Zudin A. Montgomery, Hugh E. Creagh-Brown, Benedict C. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Forty per cent of critically ill patients are affected by intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), to which skeletal muscle wasting makes a substantial contribution. This can impair outcomes in hospital, and can cause long-term physical disability after hospital discharge. No effective mitigating strategies have yet been identified. Application of a repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) a limb pressure cuff inducing brief repeated cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion, can limit disuse muscle atrophy in both healthy controls and bed-bound patients recovering from knee surgery. We wish to determine whether RVOS might be effective in mitigating against muscle wasting in the ICU. Given that RVOS can also improve vascular function in healthy controls, we also wish to assess such effects in the critically ill. We here describe a pilot study to assess whether RVOS application is safe, tolerable, feasible and acceptable for ICU patients. METHODS: This is a randomised interventional feasibility trial. Thirty-two ventilated adult ICU patients with multiorgan failure will be recruited within 48 h of admission and randomised to either the intervention arm or the control arm. Intervention participants will receive RVOS twice daily (except only once on day 1) for up to 10 days or until ICU discharge. Serious adverse events and tolerability (pain score) will be recorded; feasibility of trial procedures will be assessed against pre-specified criteria and acceptability by semi-structured interview. Together with vascular function, muscle mass and quality will be assessed using ultrasound and measures of physical function at baseline, on days 6 and 11 of study enrolment, and at ICU and hospital discharge. Blood and urine biomarkers of muscle metabolism, vascular function, inflammation and DNA damage/repair mechanism will also be analysed. The Health questionnaire will be completed 3 months after hospital discharge. DISCUSSION: If this study demonstrates feasibility, the derived data will be used to inform the design (and sample size) of an appropriately-powered prospective trial to clarify whether RVOS can help preserve muscle mass/improve vascular function in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN44340629. Registered on 26 October 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6657179/ /pubmed/31340849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chhetri, Ismita
Hunt, Julie E. A.
Mendis, Jeewaka R.
Patterson, Stephen D.
Puthucheary, Zudin A.
Montgomery, Hugh E.
Creagh-Brown, Benedict C.
Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (rvos) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (rosprox):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chhetriismita repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT huntjulieea repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mendisjeewakar repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pattersonstephend repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT puthuchearyzudina repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryhughe repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT creaghbrownbenedictc repetitivevascularocclusionstimulusrvosversusstandardcaretopreventmusclewastingincriticallyillpatientsrosproxastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial