Cargando…

The effect of the CYP2C19*2 allele on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery stenting: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of cytochrome P450 2C19*2 (CYP2C19*2) on ischemic and bleeding events in the Chinese Han population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients after coronary artery stenting were enrolled for genotyping CYP2C19*2. Platelet reactivity 4 weeks after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Dahao, Peng, Changnong, Liao, Zhiyong, Wang, Xiaoqing, Guo, Wenyu, Li, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2018.75349
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of cytochrome P450 2C19*2 (CYP2C19*2) on ischemic and bleeding events in the Chinese Han population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients after coronary artery stenting were enrolled for genotyping CYP2C19*2. Platelet reactivity 4 weeks after stent implantation was compared between different genotype groups. Ischemic and bleeding events were compared after 6 months’ follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients were enrolled and 57.7% and 42.3% of patients presented with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome, respectively. The prevalence of homozygous (AA) and heterozygous (GA) CYP2C19*2 variants was 3.5% and 24.7% respectively, and the prevalence of wild type (GG) was 71.8%. Compared to GG and GA genotype groups, the absolute platelet activity reduction was significantly lower in AA genotype (GG 43.6 ±7.8%, GA 31.9 ±6.5%, and AA 24.8 ±5.3%, p < 0.01 for trend). After 6 months’ follow-up, 3.3%, 4.8% and 11.1% of patients experienced ischemic events in GG, GA and AA genotype groups, respectively (p = 0.003 for trend). After adjusting for traditional risk factors, AA genotype was significantly associated with ischemic events, with hazard ratio 1.19 and 95% confidence interval 1.08–1.30 (p = 0.013). Also, 2.2%, 1.6% and 0% of patients experienced bleeding events in GG, GA and AA genotype groups (p = 0.153 for trend). No independent association of CYP2C19*2 genotype and bleeding events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Genotyping of CYP2C19*2 may be useful to guide antiplatelet treatment in the Chinese Han population. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate whether genotype-guided antiplatelet treatment could reduce ischemic events.